I have to apologize for that hard, undigestible stuff I posted up (Posts 226,227, 231) that has unfortunately triggered 15 posts of incoherent meltdown on this thread. It was a careless thing for me to do and I should have thought about other posters sensibilities and how they might react when they feel uncomfortable refelecting about an issue.
However, if you would care to stick your heads out of your safe room for one moment, I might add an observation about the next move of the subject of this thread. After Sweden your man has headed to Paris, arriving just in time to coincide with yet another terrorist attack, this time at the Orly airport. There he has done an interview with a girl about terrorism and sexual assault in the street, which I haven't seen yet.
A part of me thinks that after covering Sweden a journalist would then look for a different subject to cover to add variety to their reporting. Maybe the subject provides this journalist with the injection of drama he needs for his style of reporting or maybe it is some kind of right wing crusade.
Whatever the motives, the question has to be asked. How can/should one report on a subject that is considered to be politically incorrect?
Who should do that type of report?
Is it ethical that some realities be ignored for the "greater good"?
