butchersapron
Bring back hanging
In which his clients pour out their paedo antics to him.
for mc's salacious interest?In which his clients pour out their paedo antics to him.
Coz he got to the top of his game by leaving stuff where people could find it.i think you mean 'the police have all the files'
What files does he have then?Coz he got to the top of his game by leaving stuff where people could find it.
like in his computers you mean.Coz he got to the top of his game by leaving stuff where people could find it.
it'll solve any housing worries he might haveIn the unlikely event that he's sitting on information of criminality that he's conspired to cover up, how is that going to help him right now?
Haven't you seen the films - the ones where that happens?In the unlikely event that he's sitting on information of criminality that he's conspired to cover up, how is that going to help him right now?
Yeah, I can't remember the specifics. I think it was about keeping a story out of the press. I don't think it was Savile himself, but a Savile-esque move to stop something being printed.That's him then recording what someone wanting to cover something up has told him. You don't go, hey maxy i'm a massive paedo i done this and i done that, can you help? You talk about minimising potential damage should certain situations arise.
Cut a deal with the DA
Exactly.
That's what professional crooks do. Not PR people who feel their career may be salvageable if they get off.
He's a year younger than my dad who was building computers in his spare time in the 60s, still believes in paper, and his leverage cards he keeps well offshore. Can't see Mr Clifford being much differentlike in his computers you mean.
yes because all auld people are paperphiles.He's a year younger than my dad who was building computers in his spare time in the 60s, still believes in paper, and his leverage cards he keeps well offshore. Can't see Mr Clifford being much different
Office worker Simon Williams told us, “I was prepared to give Max Clifford the benefit of the doubt, but the fact that he’s secured the services of Max Clifford looks very suspicious, don’t you think?”“Why would any innocent person get Max Clifford to represent them, unless they were only in it for the money?”“If I was Max Clifford I’d ditch Max Clifford and distance myself from him really quickly.”“No, the other way round.”
PR executive Joseph Williamton-Smythe explained, “Celebrities involved in sex abuse scandals would normally be encouraged to seek Max Clifford’s services, but I’m not sure it’s the right move for Max Clifford in this case.”
“There’s the simple guilt by association element, but also why would Max Clifford want to be represented by an alleged sex offender?”
What makes you think an investigation is "going to reorder the word"? Why say that?I don't think that the investigation, arrest or even conviction of a bunch of dead or nearly-dead old pervs for alleged long-ago perving is going to re-order the world that much.
Giles..
That's because you don't get what it is that is in need of reordering because it does not affect you.I don't think that the investigation, arrest or even conviction of a bunch of dead or nearly-dead old pervs for alleged long-ago perving is going to re-order the world that much.
Giles..
so who is it then?Having just learnt the name of the latest arrest our childhood's really are being arrested in front of our eyes, there wont be anyone left soon!
yardbird said:Another man in his 60s arrested in London
BBC breaking.
so who is it then?
Twitter's bloody useless for finding out! Well, or I'm bloody useless at using it...
Aye. Grace Dent nailed it with this article, right back at the start of all this:Having just learnt the name of the latest arrest our childhood's really are being arrested in front of our eyes, there wont be anyone left soon!
The Jimmy Savile abuse scandal means men across Britain will sleep uneasily, remembering past 'conquests'
Instead of faux-outrage and arse-covering about history, I’d be happier to hear strident plans to protect and listen to young women in the future. More of that, please
Amid all the hand-wringing and harrumphing over Jimmy Savile’s alleged behaviour with teenagers in the 1970s and 80s – and any subsequent cover up – what one won’t hear much is a blasé sigh and, “Well, it was all quite normal then.” Which it was. We’ve never had much of a clue how to protect young women from older male predators, or whether to believe them when they blow the whistle. If recent events in Rochdale tell us anything, we’re still almost as clueless now.
My memories of the 80s are that schoolgirls were by and large fair game as long as they were vaguely post-pubescent. Grass on the pitch, ho ho etc. Cars would pull up at the school gate to collect “girlfriends”. The family planning centre dished out pills willy-nilly. The age of consent was treated much as wearing your seatbelt or driving home when hammered. A petty law. I mean, blimey, these men with teen girls weren’t paedophiles! These weren’t your common or garden sexual perverts in bi-focal lenses and raincoats loitering by infant school railings waiting for handstand season. These were simply older guys, totally well-adjusted, in their thirties and forties who seemed to surround themselves with young women of circa O-level age and get them drunk and have sex with them. Nothing to see here.
...