elbows
Well-Known Member
do you reckon it's true?
I would take the same approach as journalists are supposed to - need more sources.
do you reckon it's true?
You haven't looked closely enough, Minnie.In post no 1193 that ymu quoted
You haven't looked closely enough, Minnie.
But yours isn't redacted at all, and that could be a problem with all these injunctions flying about.
Best ask a mod.oh, do you mean I should delete link?
Best ask a mod.
bit of a frenzy going onAn NYT newsroom source said people at the newspaper had been "completely blown away" by Sullivan's decision to query in public Thompson's suitability as incoming CEO.
Final nail in the coffin?And now the Fail is running accusations that he was a necro as well...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-colleague-Paul-Gambaccini.html#ixzz2AAI39fvp
Yeah. Looks like he's gone as far as naming names now, though.Did we not cover the fellows stuff a near week ago?
Did we not cover the fellows stuff a near week ago?
As the bbc enters into the thread it should be no surprise there are repeatsDid we not cover the fellows stuff a near week ago?
As the bbc enters into the thread it should be no surprise there are repeats
Did we not cover the fellows stuff a near week ago?
Seem like he spent the 70s and 80s with stuff just passing him by or not doing anything when it didn't, or 'the industry' did - this is him talking about his friend Jonathon King in 2001 - you can change the names to Savile and BBC for the industry:That isn't exactly putting himself in a good light.
Former Radio 1 DJ Paul Gambaccini, who was a friend at the time, said he never knew about King's activities.
But he believes the industry may have turned a blind eye to his behaviour while he was still "bankable".
Mr Gambuccini said: "Most of the people in the record industry would not have cared.
"For the great majority, what they would have been interested in about Jonathan King was 'What can you do for me?'"
I am suspicious of the claims by Ben Fellows. He is not a reliable source. A quick google shows
"The performer, who police have not publicly named because of his age"?
Must be - going to be a whole new load of speculation centring on all young male actors now i reckon.Because, I assume, he is too young rather than too old.
Don't worry, your ignorance will be ripped asunderLuckily I will get a break from this round of speculation, since I am so out of touch that I dont think I know the names of any actors that are young.