The Rational Proof of God's Existence
- Thread starter phildwyer
- Start date
- Status
What do you get when you cross a sheep with a Hegelo-Marxian Theistical Dialectician?Is the punchline 'a wooly jumper'?
Hang on . . .
bhamgeezer
Dogs bark
I have too many goats sustained on the land I own and their population is increasing dramatically, I do not want your goat as it would cost me more in maintaining extra goats until they can be sold or eaten. The only way I will take your goat is if you pay me to compensate for the cost of owning it. Does this mean their is negative value of the goat also conceptually perceptible in the physical body of the sheep? I still want to sell you my sheep but goats are negative currency in this exchange.
Any two lines are comparable to each other, but they aren't commensurable. However they are comparable in terms of their properties (i.e. their length). Is it true to say that in order to compare a line with another line one must perceive the physical nature of one line in the other? I think it's pretty hard to see how abstract entities are compared by the perception of the physical nature of one in the other.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
what about if the goat's swapped and then leased back?
Corax
Luke 5:16
Finance lease or operational?
free spirit
more tea vicar?
a blowjob, from a sheep???
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
let's say operational for the sake of argument.
8ball
Decolonise colons!
Corax
Luke 5:16
What, you got something against the welsh? Racist.a blowjob, from a sheep???
In that case, under finance regulations you can only pay 90% of the sheep's value during the course of the agreement and then have to return the goat.
bluestreak
HomosexualityIsStalin’sAtomBombtoDestroyAmerica
8ball
Decolonise colons!
What, you got something against the welsh? Racist.
No thread lives this long on Urban without being haunted by the spectre of racism.
kyser_soze
Hawking's Angry Eyebrow
Can I securitise the goat, using the sheep as initial collaterol on it, and then re-securitise half the goats value (lets say 3 chickens), which can then be used to purchase some magic beans, and I'll pay you all back with a goose that lays golden eggs when the magic beans grow and I can raid the giant castle in the sky?
Gmart
Well-Known Member
So, yes, both parties can look at the same thing and see a different value. If bhamgeezer's situation occurred then that value would be negative, ie you would need to pay to get rid of the item. So most people would have differing views as to the value of the animal.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
it's strange how you say "we'll do it quickly this time" and then spend your next 180 posts on other threads.
Silence, fool. I shall return to this thread when I see fit.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
you should be a man and admit defeat.
Corax
Luke 5:16
I hope it's quick. We're a bit stumped by the leasing conundrum.
free spirit
more tea vicar?
wronguns.... this thread is full of themJust get the goat to suck you off
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
are we any nearer the awful proof?
fractionMan
Custom Title
I think he's admitted defeat.
fogbat
The Talibum
Homoph- oh, sorry.
free spirit
more tea vicar?
what, of dandred getting sucked off by goats?
no, but his silence speaks volumes IMO
newharper
Manxome Tove
Have I bollocks.
Like a 5-day test match, the art and beauty of this thread lies in its longevity.
I fully expect it to take several years for my proof to unfold fully. I shall return here from time to time to add a pinch of evidence here, a sprinkle of logic there, until the butterfly finally emerges from the chrysalis. And then some people are going to look very silly indeed.
Corax
Luke 5:16
Fuchs66
Ring a ding
Ah quantity not quality
I'm surprised this bollocks is still alive (if only feebly kicking)
- Status
Similar threads
