The 'Naked Rambler' jailed for 22 months, following arrest within 60 seconds of his release!

[DotCommunist]

I am a parent of a 7 year old boy. I don't mind being naked in front of him, but I wouldn't have sex in front of him. We're all born into this world naked. We're not all born into this world wanking.

speak for yourself, I used my birth certificate as a wank rag an I haven't stopped since

 

[goldenecitrone]

We're all born into this world naked. We're not all born into this world wanking.

As Jim Morrison famously sang 'like a dog without a bone, into this world we're thrown'

 

[Pickman's model]

speak for yourself, I used my birth certificate as a wank rag an I haven't stopped since

have you similar plans for your death certificate?

 

[Pickman's model]

Obviously if a child sees a sexual act then it could be disturbing for them.

best for them to be disturbed in their teens then i suppose

 

[DotCommunist]

have you similar plans for your death certificate?

i'll be aiming for the hangmans eye with my final shot

 

[Spymaster]

I am a parent of a 7 year old boy. I don't mind being naked in front of him, but I wouldn't have sex in front of him. We're all born into this world naked. We're not all born into this world wanking.

Pah, complete red herring. Someone had to fuck in order that we'd all be born. So why is public fucking frowned upon?

At the end of the day it's because some people would find it offensive or frightening or ... something.

It's the same, albeit to a lesser extent, with public nudity. Some people find it offensive, possibly frightening, confusing etc.,

Lots of people do.

Who are you to tell them that they're wrong to feel this way? More importantly who is Mr Gough?

If your kid came home tonight and told you he wanted to go to school naked tomorrow, what would you say?

 

[Pickman's model]

Pah, complete red herring. Someone had to fuck in order that we'd all be born. So why is public fucking frowned upon?

At the end of the day it's because some people would find it offensive or frightening or ... something.

It's the same, albeit to a lesser extent, with public nudity. Some people find it offensive, possibly frightening, confusing etc.,

Lots of people do.

Who are you to tell them that they're wrong to feel this way? More importantly who is Mr Gough?

it's frowned upon by people like you to hide their inadequacies, so they never get to find out how good people like me are at it

 

[scifisam]

Obviously if a child sees a sexual act then it could be disturbing for them.

And my argument implies that if we are subjected to tens or hundreds of images of nudity on a daily basis, then why are we so outraged when an actual real life person decides they do not wish to wear clothes, when we constantly have the arses, tits, legs and other bits of people who are deemed to be attractive enough to sell a product shoved in our faces?

Where do you live that you see hundreds of naked images a day without meaning to?

 

[Pickman's model]

Where do you live that you see hundreds of naked images a day without meaning to?

i don't think enviro said s/he didn't mean so...

 

[scifisam]

i don't think enviro said s/he didn't mean so...

Ok. Not quite the same point though, if he just looks at naked people a lot by choice.

 

[Spymaster]

Where do you live that you see hundreds of naked images a day without meaning to?

Quite. That's total nonsense.

Fannies, knobs, bollocks, and naked arses are covered in mainstream advertising.

Mr Gough is simply being asked to do the same. There's no inconsistency here.

 

[phildwyer]

Pah, complete red herring. Someone had to fuck in order that we'd all be born. So why is public fucking frowned upon?

At the end of the day it's because some people would find it offensive or frightening or ... something.

It's the same, albeit to a lesser extent, with public nudity.

Public sex is a universal taboo, nudity isn't.

 

[Spymaster]

i don't think enviro said s/he didn't mean so...

She was trying to make the point that we're bombarded with imagery of nudity on a daily basis, and as such shouldn't be "outraged" by this twats exhibitionism.

The point is that we aren't exposed to nude imagery anything like as frequently as Enviro suggested, so the argument fails.

 

[Pickman's model]

She was trying to make the point that we're bombarded with imagery of nudity on a daily basis, and as such shouldn't be "outraged" by this twats exhibitionism.

The point is that we aren't exposed to nude imagery anything like as frequently as Enviro suggested, so the argument fails.

has 'this twat' walked down your street naked?

 

[cesare]

Quite. That's total nonsense.

Fannies, knobs, bollocks, and naked arses are covered in mainstream advertising.

Mr Gough is simply being asked to do the same. There's no inconsistency here.

Check out Tom Ford, Calvin Klein, Toesox, American Apparel, Dolce e Gabbana. Oh, and PETA of course.

 

[Spymaster]

has 'this twat' walked down your street naked?

No, but I've got the dogs ready just in case he makes it past the mosque at the bottom of the road.

And I'm exercising my right to be outraged on behalf of others!

 

[Pickman's model]

No, but I've got the dogs ready just in case he makes it past the mosque at the bottom of the road.

And I'm exercising my right to be outraged on behalf of others!

you're exercising your right to bore people to tears on others' behalf. i thought more of you, i really did, fuck knows why

 

[cesare]

you're exercising your right to bore people to tears on others' behalf. i thought more of you, i really did, fuck knows why

I'm quite entertained cos I had no idea that all that machismo was a front for such prudery.

 

[Pickman's model]

I'm quite entertained cos I had no idea that all that machismo was a front for such prudery.

 

[Pickman's model]

I'm quite entertained cos I had no idea that all that machismo was a front for such prudery.

he'd rather be a dick than see a dick from the sound of things.

 

[Spymaster]

Check out Tom Ford, Calvin Klein, Toesox, American Apparel, Dolce e Gabbana. Oh, and PETA of course.

Show me an ad from any of them that we see "hundreds of times a day" and includes a bloke with his nuts out, or a woman flashing her clunge.

 

[weltweit]

Has he ever explained his position, perhaps on a website or in an interview or something.

Since I have been aware of him I have yet to learn why, really why, he is doing this.

 

[cesare]

he'd rather be a dick than see a dick from the sound of things.

Maybe the indignation (not just Spy) is concern in case the lasses see flaccid penises - oh noes! Forgetting, of course, that the lasses have the care of those at the birth and illness and aging of mens.

 

[cesare]

Show me an ad from any of them that we see "hundreds of times a day" and includes a bloke with his nuts out, or a woman flashing her clunge.

Ah, I see you're narrowing it down from your unfortunate earlier post.

 

[scifisam]

Check out Tom Ford, Calvin Klein, Toesox, American Apparel, Dolce e Gabbana. Oh, and PETA of course.

Do they have actual naked people in public adverts? I mean, you walk down the street and see them? I bet there have been complaints and so on then. Never seen any naked ads myself.

Argh. This is so urban. If someone on here posted about being upset about being flashed by a stranger, making them feel unsafe in a supposedly safe place, then everyone would be sympathetic. This really isn't any different unless you expect everyone this bloke passes to know exactly why he's doing it.

 

[Pickman's model]

Show me an ad from any of them that we see "hundreds of times a day" and includes a bloke with his nuts out, or a woman flashing her clunge.

no i will not satisfy your prurient curiosity

 

[weltweit]

afaict humans are the only animals to wear clothes.

even in warm places where they are not needed to ward against the cold.

funny lot .. them humans ..

 

[cesare]

Do they have actual naked people in public adverts? I mean, you walk down the street and see them? I bet there have been complaints and so on then. Never seen any naked ads myself.

Argh. This is so urban. If someone on here posted about being upset about being flashed by a stranger, making them feel unsafe in a supposedly safe place, then everyone would be sympathetic. This really isn't any different unless you expect everyone this bloke passes to know exactly why he's doing it.

Flashing's different to this. Flashing's an act to deliberately upset/unnerve someone. It only has shock value for a limited amount of time unless it's coupled with a direct threat to attack. It's nothing like what this bloke (or that bloke in Spain/Portugal) is doing.

 

[Corax]

It's the same, albeit to a lesser extent, with public nudity. Some people find it offensive, possibly frightening, confusing etc.,

Lots of people do.

Who are you to tell them that they're wrong to feel this way? More importantly who is Mr Gough?

Some people find non-whites living in the UK offensive, possibly frightening, confusing etc.

 

[DotCommunist]

loads of adverts have womens arses in them, we are supposed to assume there is a G string. Everyone does it. Womens bodies sell product- hairy sacked rambling men do not.

I dunno.