The 'Naked Rambler' jailed for 22 months, following arrest within 60 seconds of his release!

[ViolentPanda]

its because it actually offends my sense of propriety . Im not exactly a puritan . Im not talking about a hemline above the knee . Im talking about a man walking about all the time with his bell end out . There is actually such a thing as actual propriety . Its not something Mary Whitehouse made up, no matter how stalinist it might appear to some .

If you dont believe me, tomorrow morning approach your neighbours kids with no clothes on , point to your exposed penis and explain in detail to them its function ,its folds , your testes etc while stressing the absolute, utmost , unmistakable importance of your actions being completely non sexual , just in case there might be a misunderstanding .

Youll soon see how old fashioned i am then.

No-one is talking about actual direct contact with children and pointing to the penis except you, you hysteric. The thread is about someone who is harmlessly perambulating around with no clothes on. People who do such things generally look absurd and not particularly attractive, but it's hardly threatening. It's only your socialisation that eventually makes it threatening.

 

[xes]

Casually Red has a strange fixation on sexualising this. Fucking pervert.

 

[ViolentPanda]

ok..then explain to someone elses scared and distressed children it was just a man getting his cock out to them, who didnt actually want or get round to bumming them . Just someone who likes kids watching his cock as opposed too being bummed . That will set their minds at rest , and im sure theyll feel quite silly later on for all the hullabaloo . As would any sensible parent .

Meanwhile while theres a fuss about UKIP foster parents being discrimnated against not enough is being done for naked men who want to be foster parents . Its a disgrace, this discrimination lark .

So this fella has "got his cock out" to children, rather than walking past them naked?
catch a hold of yourself!

 

[ViolentPanda]

Casually Red has a strange fixation on sexualising this. Fucking pervert.

I think a Christian Brother may have bumfingered him.

 

[Casually Red]

Definitely fixated.

no, fuck off . Seriously walk up to your neighbours kids with your cock out . See what happens . The people who have a problem with this actually wont be sexually fixated on your cock . That wont actually be their problem, and its not mine either.

 

[Greebo]

Casually Red has a strange fixation on sexualising this. Fucking pervert.

Not to mention being obsessed with talking about VP's bits.

 

[Casually Red]

So this fella has "got his cock out" to children, rather than walking past them naked?
catch a hold of yourself!

ok, "walk past your local kids naked" as opposed to " getting your cock out to kids"

everyone will appreciate the subtle difference im sure

 

[Greebo]

no, fuck off . Seriously walk up to your neighbours kids with your cock out . See what happens . The people who have a problem with this actually wont be sexually fixated on your cock . That wont actually be their problem, and its not mine either.

Your problem, among several others sweetie, is that you've assumed that I'm male. How the Hel can I flash what I haven't got?

 

[ViolentPanda]

ok, "walk past your local kids naked" as opposed to " getting your cock out to kids"

everyone will appreciate the subtle difference im sure

The difference is hardly fucking subtle, is it? The former implies an action taken that has no link to children being passed at some stage of the rambler's walk, the latter implies actively whipping his cock out in the presence of kids, you shrieking hysterical booby.

 

[Greebo]

ok, "walk past your local kids naked" as opposed to " getting your cock out to kids"

everyone will appreciate the subtle difference im sure

Those who are civilised and not neurotic about such things would know the difference.

 

[Casually Red]

No-one is talking about actual direct contact with children and pointing to the penis except you, you hysteric. The thread is about someone who is harmlessly perambulating around with no clothes on. People who do such things generally look absurd and not particularly attractive, but it's hardly threatening. It's only your socialisation that eventually makes it threatening.

hes a freak , and jails the best and possibly safest place for the weird attention seeker . Its not trolling or taking the piss to actually hold the view that public adult nudity is actually not on . Its not exactly talibanish . Its pretty fucking normal and theres good reasons why most people oppose it.
The guy is a fucking twat deserving of no sympathy at all

 

[Casually Red]

Those who are civilised and not neurotic about such things would.

a
ok, advetise yourself as a naked babysitter . Im sure the offers will be flying in, from the fritzl, west, sutcliffe, glitter and saville extended families

 

[Greebo]

a
ok, advetise yourself as a naked babysitter . Im sure the offers will be flying in, from the fritzl, west, sutcliffe, glitter and saville extended families

Fuck off. I did my share of babysitting when younger and have neither the time, energy, not inclination for it now - naked or otherwise.

 

[Casually Red]

Your problem, among several others sweetie, is that you've assumed that I'm male. How the Hel can I flash what I haven't got?

. My apologies .You keep calling me sweetie, which made me thinKyou were a big camp gayer witha moustache and leather gestapo hat, as opposed to someone who has a ladys fanny parts and is therefore a lady person.

 

[ViolentPanda]

hes a freak , and jails the best and possibly safest place for the weird attention seeker . Its not trolling or taking the piss to actually hold the view that public adult nudity is actually not on . Its not exactly talibanish . Its pretty fucking normal and theres good reasons why most people oppose it.
The guy is a fucking twat deserving of no sympathy at all

I'm sure he thinks you're a cunt too.
As for public adult nudity, it's already permitted in some small parts of the UK. It's not something I find aesthetically-pleasing, but it's not something any kid who's ever seen their own genitals or (shock! horror!) the genitals of their parents is going to be particularly shocked by unless they've been piled high with spurious religious or moral hangups about having genitals in the first place. There's worse things out there that warrant more attention than some leathery old naturist who doesn't despite what you've said, actively expose himself to children.

 

[Greebo]

. My apologies .You keep calling me sweetie, which made me thinKyou were a big camp gayer witha moustache and leather gestapo hat, as opposed to someone who has a ladys fanny parts and is therefore a lady person.

 

[Casually Red]

I There's worse things out there that warrant more attention than some leathery old naturist who doesn't despite what you've said, actively expose himself to children.

mostly because theres no kids in gaol

 

[DexterTCN]

Pretty sure I took my kids and grand-kids to the Art Gallery in Edinburgh and there was nudity in there...we should shut it down, it's a paedophile trap!

Or burn it, maybe jail it indefinitely.

 

[LiamO]

I think a Christian Brother may have bumfingered him.

I think he was too ugly for them... and has carried the shame of his rejection ever since

Anyways he has tottered off home now, God Bless him.

 

[DotCommunist]

lets hope no naked joggers intercept him

 

[Wilf]

lets hope no naked joggers intercept him

There's a naked rambler in all of us.

 

[DexterTCN]

There's a naked rambler in all of us.

But if it's outside...you go to jail.

 

[Ax^]

<Snip>
The guy is a fucking twat deserving of no sympathy at all

Bone him

 

[Frances Lengel]

Bone him

Shit in his hand bag.

 

[Frances Lengel]

. My apologies .You keep calling me sweetie, which made me thinKyou were a big camp gayer witha moustache and leather gestapo hat, as opposed to someone who has a ladys fanny parts and is therefore a lady person.

Mate, you let yourself down slightly with that post. FWIW, I've got some sympathy with your argument - A grown man inflicting his nakedness on anyone unfortunate enough to be in his vacinity can't really be a good thing - It's somehow arrogant for one thing and that's without even considering aesthetics. I've got little sympathy for the guy, don't reckon he should be doing time though, I doubt he's a pervert just a clown.

 

[Frances Lengel]

As I sit here in my nudery, you can have every coin in my.... pocket

I've had many a wet penny in my pocket - One of the reasons I stopped wearing chinos.

 

[Wilf]

Mate, you let yourself down slightly with that post. FWIW, I've got some sympathy with your argument - A grown man inflicting his nakedness on anyone unfortunate enough to be in his vacinity can't really be a good thing - It's somehow arrogant for one thing and that's without even considering aesthetics. I've got little sympathy for the guy, don't reckon he should be doing time though, I doubt he's a pervert just a clown.

Yep, agree with that (both the point and the reply to CR). At an abstract level I agree with the nudey feller, it would be good if we started to be a bit more relaxed about each others bods - and to take the law out of it. However, as you say, it's his assumption that he can impose it that fucks me off a bit. Gone way beyond a stand on a point of principle, become just an obesession. Bit of a Brian Hawe without a war to fight. Sometimes people choose to take themselves away from their family, their life, to fight some evil, some real point of principle. Hard to see he's doing that now, just fighting to not give in. Often it's impressive to see that, but I'm not sure this is.

... but, having said all that, there is something truly repulsive here - the actions of the state towards him. Just as he might be pursing a fairly pointless principle, so are they defending it. Difference is they can keep a man locked up year after year (a lot of it is solitary?), when the best reaction to his silliness would be to ignore it.

 

[Plumdaff]

I'd imagine the reaction of the majority of children who spot this man out and about, so to speak, would be absolute hilarity, maybe curiosity and a little embarrassment too. I can't imagine any of them getting upset or traumatised unless that emotion was modelled by an adult they were with. My childhood self would have school lunched out on a story like this bloke for months, and I was raised proper full on Catholic.

 

[DotCommunist]

it wasn't his swinging balls when we come down to it. It was a battle of wills between his exposed gonads and the local judiciary who refused to accept his purple headed truth. Thank the lord that he is now in a place where his old mans pubes can be stroked by the wind without threatening his liberty.

 

[DexterTCN]

it wasn't his swinging balls when we come down to it. It was a battle of wills between his exposed gonads and the local judiciary who refused to accept his purple headed truth. Thank the lord that he is now in a place where his old mans pubes can be stroked by the wind without threatening his liberty.

Have you been reading 50 shades?