Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The 'Naked Rambler' jailed for 22 months, following arrest within 60 seconds of his release!

So will all the people twatting on about his arrests being because he was in backwards, prudish Scotland STFU now and issue a formal apology to all Scottish posters and posters of Scottish descent?

Some sort of remuneration for emotional distress caused would also be appreciated.
 
That's not a pocket, Wilf, and I'm not sticking my hand in it. :eek:
sporan.jpeg
 
What I want to know is why he has such a big rucksack. I used to do hiking, and the rucksack was full of the various layers of clothes needed for different weather, especially in winter. All he must have is his tent and cooking apparatus. He also says he is hungry so he has no food with him. How does he pay his way when walking? Is he expecting free handouts? I would think that on a cold October day he would be glad to be arrested, taken into a relatively warm cell and fed.
If he didn't get arrested he would die of cold.
 
Oh, it's already been said I didn't read all the pages. I'm going to bed now it's 7.40am, it's been a long weekend.
 
He's been allowed out, without having to put on any clothes first. BTW Casually Red, context is all; there's a huge difference between an adult (or juvenile) who just happens to be naked while doing something non sexual, and somebody exposing their bits to shock or to get off on it.

and you can tell how ? apart from the obvious
 
Casually Red you are full of shit. And perhaps whiskey.


oh yeah... someone who shall remain nameless just reminded me you got your ginger cock out for thrills on the internet. My apologies for suggesting some bearded fop likes getting his cock out for thrills.
 
as jimmy saville wasnt sporting one 24 seven apparently not, otherwise he might have been apprehended much earlier .
So, basically, you think that walking or swimming while not wearing clothes is as sexual an act as ramming your tongue down somebody's throat or groping them while clothed? Interesting.
 
So, basically, you think that walking or swimming while not wearing clothes is as sexual an act as ramming your tongue down somebody's throat or groping them while clothed? Interesting.
no i dont think that . I dont think kissing someone is comparable to to anexhibitionist flashing his cock at all and sundry
 
no i dont think that . I dont think kissing someone is comparable to to anexhibitionist flashing his cock at all and sundry
Firstly, 4 replies made by you to this thread within 15 minutes suggest a somewhat unhealthy fixation.

Secondly, I agree with you to this extent: An exhibitionist isn't forcing entry into the body of anyone else. Therefore by my standards, the exhibitionist is less harmful than the molester.
 
Secondly, I agree with you to this extent: An exhibitionist isn't forcing entry into the body of anyone else. Therefore by my standards, the exhibitionist is less harmful than the molester.

so youll tell your kids..cheer up, could have been worse
 
no i dont think that . I dont think kissing someone is comparable to to anexhibitionist flashing his cock at all and sundry

Depends whether the exhibitionist is an exhibitionist. Do you merely perceive it as exhibitionism because that's what was beaten into you at school, rather than there actually being any exhibitionistic intent on the part of the naked rambler?
Perhaps you have a secret guilt, and decry male nakedness because of a secret longing to see more of it? :hmm: :hmm:
 
Firstly, 4 replies made by you to this thread within 15 minutes suggest a somewhat unhealthy fixation.

Secondly, I agree with you to this extent: An exhibitionist isn't forcing entry into the body of anyone else. Therefore by my standards, the exhibitionist is less harmful than the molester.

Perhaps exhibitionism is a "gateway behaviour" to molestation? :hmm:
Quick, get the names of those toddlers paddling naked in the sea!!! They're likely to turn into nonces unless they're disciplined away from such reprobate behaviour!
 
Nah, you're a cunt for not elucidating why it's wrong beyond the fact that it somehow offends your sense of propriety. :D

its because it actually offends my sense of propriety . Im not exactly a puritan . Im not talking about a hemline above the knee . Im talking about a man walking about all the time with his bell end out . There is actually such a thing as actual propriety . Its not something Mary Whitehouse made up, no matter how stalinist it might appear to some .

If you dont believe me, tomorrow morning approach your neighbours kids with no clothes on , point to your exposed penis and explain in detail to them its function ,its folds , your testes etc while stressing the absolute, utmost , unmistakable importance of your actions being completely non sexual , just in case there might be a misunderstanding .

Youll soon see how old fashioned i am then.
 
<snip> tomorrow morning approach your neighbours kids with no clothes on , point to your exposed penis and explain in detail to them its function ,its folds , your testes etc while stressing the absolute, utmost , unmistakable importance of your actions being completely non sexual , just in case there might be a misunderstanding .

Youll soon see how old fashioned i am then.
Definitely fixated. :facepalm:
 
Sweetie, I don't have children. Thank you for your assumption.

ok..then explain to someone elses scared and distressed children it was just a man getting his cock out to them, who didnt actually want or get round to bumming them . Just someone who likes kids watching his cock as opposed too being bummed . That will set their minds at rest , and im sure theyll feel quite silly later on for all the hullabaloo . As would any sensible parent .

Meanwhile while theres a fuss about UKIP foster parents being discrimnated against not enough is being done for naked men who want to be foster parents . Its a disgrace, this discrimination lark .
 
Back
Top Bottom