Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

the long-awaited 'why the telegraph is going downhill' thread

_DSC8157_3228205b.jpg

my eyes :( my poor eyes :(
 
That said, the same page shows the Express has the jaw=dropping story that "NHS hires foreign nurses".


I wonder what was wrong with the ExpressEditor, must be something serious if he had to make his first visit to an NHS hospital in 30 years
 
....today's front page has a Battle of Britain photo....they've identified a Hurricane as a Spitfire... :facepalm: ( shakes head slowly in disbelief )
 
Obviously mindful of their massive socialist readership and anxious to dissuade them from voting Labour, today's front page bellows "Corbyn refuses to meet the Queen".
 
The abysmal Simon Heffer uses the Paris atrocity to cheerlead for Le Pen. Naturally, his column has attracted all manner of fash, racists and xenophobes, who give us the benefit of their 'wisdom'.

First, he cites Le Figaro and why not? He's a Tory.

The website of Le Figaro, the conservative French newspaper, proclaimed that there was “war in the heart of Paris”. It is a mood widely shared by the French people, whose attitudes have themselves been radicalised by these terrible events.

Cue the call for "western civilisation" to be "saved".
Above all, we must realise that although this atrocity will change things in France quite profoundly, it is an alarm call to the rest of Europe, to us, and to the whole of Western civilisation. We are all at war with Islamic extremism.

The 128 people murdered in Paris could just as easily have been murdered in London, Berlin, Amsterdam or Rome. French politicians now see clearly that these attacks are a game-changer in terms of how their nation protects itself against this terrorism: so must the rest of Europe’s political class.

Et voila! Le pièce de résistance!
The French press has for months been forecasting that Marine Le Pen’s Front National could win two or possibly even three of the 22 regions in metropolitan France, and warning that such a result would be an electoral earthquake for the country.

Although Mme Le Pen has cleaned up her party from the overtly racist, anti-Semitic and homophobic entity it was under her father, Jean-Marie Le Pen – from whom she is, as a result, estranged – she has been the only high-profile politician to warn consistently of the dangers of the large numbers of Muslims in France, and of their failure to integrate properly into French society.

Then he plugs a dodgy book.
In his highly controversial novel Soumission [Submission], published the day of the Charlie Hebdo attack, Michel Houellebecq predicted a France that, at the 2022 presidential election, faced a choice in the final round between Mme Le Pen and an Islamist.

In his novel, the Islamist wins and proceeds to Islamise France, because the main parties of the French Left and Right, pushed to the margins in the first round, throw their weight behind him in order to keep Mme Le Pen out.

Paris terror attacks an alarm bell for liberal, borderless Europe
 
I saw Heffer as he was leaving Chelmsford station a few months ago. To my great surprise it looked like he managed to fit through the ticket barriers.
 
An article on business rates

It features a picture of a Cambridge street encaptioned "Shops in the North..." featuring a person on a badly airbrushed "unicycle". The same picture they used in this 2013 article, at which time they seemed to know where it was taken.
 
They seem to do it every fortnight, but the current issue of Private Eye could almost have a whole pull-out section on the current travails at the Telegraph. The mole(s) obviously still haven't been found.
 
That's a weird decision. When newspapers decide which party they support, and shout about it to the readers, it's essentially an editorial and commentary decision*. It's nothing to do with marketing or commercial operations. Hope they appeal.

*Yes, yes, lizards control the media, those of the proprietor's prejudices that the advertisers don't object to, etc etc. But in terms of how newspapers actually work, the point stands.
 
why would they bother to appeal for 30k, its chump change. Not to me obviously, but that lot could swallow it and smile.
 
That's a weird decision. When newspapers decide which party they support, and shout about it to the readers, it's essentially an editorial and commentary decision*. It's nothing to do with marketing or commercial operations. Hope they appeal.
Not sure what ground they'd appeal on. The contravention was Regulation 22(2) of PECR.


Screenshot (17).png


Screenshot (18).png
 
I thought it hinged on people who had opted in for editorial communication getting what was judged to be marketing communication?
 
Back
Top Bottom