Either we’re in or we’re out. There is no way of signing up to the European Convention on Human Rights without accepting the ultimate jurisdiction of its court in Strasbourg. The various compromises being kicked around in the Conservative Party – scrapping the Human Rights Act, removing direct justiciability and so on – would all leave Britain ultimately subject to the whim of the manqué politicians and human rights activists (plus a handful of proper judges) who comprise the European Court of Human Rights.
So let’s ask the question. What specific benefits accrue to the United Kingdom as the result of our adherence to the Convention? It ought to be the most basic question of all, yet it is almost never posed. Our legal establishment, like our political establishment, takes our adherence as a
datum, a given – a fact around which everything else must be fitted. As with EU membership, they are prepared to do pretty much anything that sounds tough, short of actually leaving. Hence the slightly garbled
briefing to Nick Robinson today, which suggests that ministers are groping around for some half-way status.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/d...e-echr-we-should-leave-cleanly/#disqus_thread