Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The kulaks are revolting - does Urban back big farmer?

What do we do with the farmers?

  • Stop the tax grab.

    Votes: 8 10.5%
  • Stop the subsidies

    Votes: 8 10.5%
  • Send them to the gulags

    Votes: 9 11.8%
  • Send Jeremy Clarkson and Nigel Farage to the gulags

    Votes: 51 67.1%
  • Re-educate the Urban population.

    Votes: 8 10.5%
  • Re-educate the rural population.

    Votes: 5 6.6%
  • Nationalise all large farms with no compensation and collectivise

    Votes: 27 35.5%
  • Ignore, It'll soon be forgotten like the Cuntryside Alliance was.

    Votes: 15 19.7%
  • The Liberal Denocrats are winning here

    Votes: 4 5.3%

  • Total voters
    76
are you sure the current farmers are the best people to do that?

Maybe, maybe not. But the entire debate about this is framed in terms of fairness rather than national security, which doesn't instil much confidence in me that any policy proposed will actually make things better. Give me your ideas about how to make our agricultural sector more secure and I am all ears.
 
The problem here is that people are looking at the issue through the lense of fairness or morality. I couldn't give a damn even if every farmer was an obnoxious, top-hat wearing toff. The fact is that the country's food supply is an issue of national security. Absolutely every benefit and privilege should be granted to those that keep that supply up and running. To hell with fairness.
They get and have got loads of benefits, paid left right and centre and they still whine
 
Maybe, maybe not. But the entire debate about this is framed in terms of fairness rather than national security, which doesn't instil much confidence in me that any policy proposed will actually make things better. Give me your ideas about how to make our agricultural sector more secure and I am all ears.
I work on lots of secure networks that are vital in keeping the nation secure as well as ensuring the NHS, civil service, supermarkets (part of the food chain and critical to our food security) and emergency services run smoothly. Do I get a tax break?
 
I work on lots of secure networks that are vital in keeping the nation secure as well as ensuring the NHS, civil service, supermarkets (part of the food chain and critical to our food security) and emergency services run smoothly. Do I get a tax break?

Depends on the specifics of what you do. I'll allow you to present your case and then make a decision.
 
I work on lots of secure networks that are vital in keeping the nation secure as well as ensuring the NHS, civil service, supermarkets (part of the food chain and critical to our food security) and emergency services run smoothly. Do I get a tax break?
Pfft, no. :rolleyes:
 
I'm torn on this one.
Having put a little thought into this, I'm no longer torn.
Tax the fuckers! And not just the paltry amount that's on the cards when one of them snuffs it, take a leaf out of Norway's book and tax them properly for using natural/national resources for their own enrichment.
Land is a national resource. Nobody should be allowed to own land. It should be rented to them.
Start by taking back the land those royal cunts stole, or make them grow food for the people. Their choice.
 
Having put a little thought into this, I'm no longer torn.
Tax the fuckers! And not just the paltry amount that's on the cards when one of them snuffs it, take a leaf out of Norway's book and tax them properly for using natural/national resources for their own enrichment.
Land is a national resource. Nobody should be allowed to own land. It should be rented to them.
Start by taking back the land those royal cunts stole, or make them grow food for the people. Their choice.
that"s more like it! :thumbs:
 
Seems the appropriate place to put this. I know Jeremy Clarkson said that Kier Starmer is banned from his pub but apparently, it seems Nick Griffin is welcome...
GcHSf9cXcAAxyVl.jpg
 
I'm shocked, shocked I tell you:


View attachment 451951
"non tax paying"
complains man who's organised a protest against losing a tax exemption.
 
This is, of course, arrant nonsense. Any state, or supra state, intent on bolstering food security would implement some dedicated programme of incentives such as the EU's CAP. Our state has withdrawn from such a programme to replace intensification with subsidies for de-intensification. Manipulating personal fiscal allowances at the margin is massively insignificant to any question of national food security. In reality the main issues of food security that actually matter occur at the level of household budgets where increasing numbers of families cannot afford the food they need. But neither farmers nor the state care about that.

That is not at all what CAP did - most of the payments were in tier 1 - the BPS (Basic Payments Scheme) which was a delinked payment based on land area and not production. It was the result of decoupling subsidies from production. Prior to that we had production based subs which led to overproduction (think: EEC wine lakes, butter mountains etc).
 
That is not at all what CAP did - most of the payments were in tier 1 - the BPS (Basic Payments Scheme) which was a delinked payment based on land area and not production. It was the result of decoupling subsidies from production. Prior to that we had production based subs which led to overproduction (think: EEC wine lakes, butter mountains etc).
The butter mountain and the wine lake occurred under the Common Agricultural Policy.
 
That is not at all what CAP did - most of the payments were in tier 1 - the BPS (Basic Payments Scheme) which was a delinked payment based on land area and not production. It was the result of decoupling subsidies from production. Prior to that we had production based subs which led to overproduction (think: EEC wine lakes, butter mountains etc).
That's interesting, thanks. What time-frame are you referring to?
 
Back
Top Bottom