Crispy
The following psytrance is baṉned: All
The Left? This is reddit, uber-libertatian free speech bastion (as they like to think of themselves)huge chunks of the left have circled their wagons around AC
The Left? This is reddit, uber-libertatian free speech bastion (as they like to think of themselves)huge chunks of the left have circled their wagons around AC
If you post info from such a partisan source, you can expect people to question it. You know this.Nope I linked to some information he's posted up, you haven't discussed or debated that info just kept up a steady stream of posts about what a "transphobe" he is, you and your chums did that.
You linked directly to linehan who posted up his own comment and that from ‘a friend’. You’re either being disingenuous or naive.Nope I linked to some information he's posted up, you haven't discussed or debated that info just kept up a steady stream of posts about what a "transphobe" he is, you and your chums did that.
The Left? This is reddit, uber-libertatian free speech bastion (as they like to think of themselves)
Can we talk about Reddit employing a person who employed a paedophile as their agent when they were standing for GP election and who is now married to a paedophile?
Reddit's most popular subreddits go private in protest against 'censorship'
A Reddit Private Community message is appearing for users, after a protest against the alleged hiring of Aimee Challenor caused subreddits to go dark.www.gamerevolution.com
has nathaniel knight has been convicted of a sexual offence?Can we talk about Reddit employing a person who employed a paedophile as their agent when they were standing for GP election and who is now married to a paedophile?
Reddit's most popular subreddits go private in protest against 'censorship'
A Reddit Private Community message is appearing for users, after a protest against the alleged hiring of Aimee Challenor caused subreddits to go dark.www.gamerevolution.com
Read his tweets. He admits to being a paedophile. He denies ever having acted upon his urges irl.i suppose nathaniel knight has been convicted of a sexual offence?
I have not "graduated" from a fetish for fantasy children to a fetish for real, living, breathing children.
never mind india knight's partner, i'm angry that anyone works at the times. or the sun. or the mail.I assume to be consistent the people angry at Reddit hiring Aimee Challenor are also just as angry about India Knight working for the Times? (convicted paedo partner)
Challenor seems a damaged person who hasn't necessarily behaved well in the past but has she been convicted of a crime? Is she not allowed to work?
i have people like you to read stuff like that so i don't have toRead his tweets. He admits to being a paedophile. He denies ever having acted upon his urges irl.
His words:
putting your legal hat on, would that be a defence to any libel action taken against urban 75?Read his tweets. He admits to being a paedophile. He denies ever having acted upon his urges irl.
His words:
I would say that an admin position on a social media platform is a particularly ill-suited job for such a person. Whoever in HR was responsible for hiring her seems particularly ill-suited for their job too.I assume to be consistent the people angry at Reddit hiring Aimee Challenor are also just as angry about India Knight working for the Times? (convicted paedo partner)
Challenor seems a damaged person who hasn't necessarily behaved well in the past but has she been convicted of a crime? Is she not allowed to work?
It's not really clear to me what her job with Reddit involves tbh, and according to the article above they haven't said. Is she definitely an admin?I would say that an admin position on a social media platform is a particularly ill-suited job for such a person. Whoever in HR was responsible for hiring her seems particularly ill-suited for their job too.
I assume to be consistent the people angry at Reddit hiring Aimee Challenor are also just as angry about India Knight working for the Times? (convicted paedo partner)
Challenor seems a damaged person who hasn't necessarily behaved well in the past but has she been convicted of a crime? Is she not allowed to work?
Not sure it matters. She was in a position through which she could have content removed and users banned for posting an article that mentions her name. Whatever the name is for that position in the company, she was clearly not the right person to be doing it.It's not really clear to me what her job with Reddit involves tbh, and according to the article above they haven't said. Is she definitely an admin?
Reddit claim in their statement there was a complaint of doxxing from an employee, and an overzealous autodelete thing - I don't see anything that says she had control over the process. She could work in accounts for all we know.Not sure it matters. She was in a position through which she could have content removed and users banned for posting an article that mentions her name. Whatever the name is for that position in the company, she was clearly not the right person to be doing it.
It's opaque, because reddit has a policy not to disclose the real world names of their admins. Much like here.It's not really clear to me what her job with Reddit involves tbh, and according to the article above they haven't said. Is she definitely an admin?
Trans unemployment runs at approximately 50% in the uk. But one trans woman has a job at a company you’ve heard of, so that must mean trans people aren’t really oppressed.It's nothing to do with AC getting a job - at least it ain't for me (although the ease with which this rep of the "most oppressed group ever" managed to stroll into a major internet corporate is kinda interesting pinkwashing)
It's opaque, because reddit has a policy not to disclose the real world names of their admins. Much like here.
The activation of the automated system that enforces that policy is all the evidence we have here.
Yeah, leaving aside the rights and wrongs of this particular individual, I assume that this logic also means that (cis)women's oppression ended in the UK by 1979 at the latest, and it's ridiculous to talk about black people in the US being oppressed from 2008 onwards?Trans unemployment runs at approximately 50% in the uk. But one trans woman has a job at a company you’ve heard of, so that must mean trans people aren’t really oppressed.
Trans unemployment runs at approximately 50% in the uk.
But one trans woman has a job at a company you’ve heard of, so that must mean trans people aren’t really oppressed.
lolI know you've no interest in finding any common ground
yeh but that would involve some people actually thinking and i don't think they're really up for that.It really would be great if we could talk about this particular woman who happens to be trans, who most of us agree is a bit of a knob, without it being used as a vehicle to chat shit about trans people as a group.
Yes I am.I assume to be consistent the people angry at Reddit hiring Aimee Challenor are also just as angry about India Knight working for the Times? (convicted paedo partner)
Challenor seems a damaged person who hasn't necessarily behaved well in the past but has she been convicted of a crime? Is she not allowed to work?