Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The big Brexit thread - news, updates and discussion

I've not seen that report before. But I've read its summary document just now.

I don't think its conclusions support a claim that there was corruption on a large scale.

The bit that specifically mentions government ministers passing on leads says:






There may have been (and probably was) some level of corruption but I've not seen convincing evidence of what scale it was at.

Okay, so billions of pounds siphoned off to the Tories' mates is fine by you. That's all we needed to know.
 
Except that hes got to keep one eye on the red wall and the proclaimed levelling up agenda if he wants to retain Tory w/class votes
I don't think he does, for all his bulllshit there isn't much to be done to actually level up without unacceptable (to the Tories) levels of public investment. I think a lot of the Labour seats that went Tory at the last election were a one off due to Brexit and will return a Labour MP again in 2024.
I expect the Tories to win again in 2024 but with nothing like the majority they got this time.
 
Billions of pounds? Where is this enumerated? Somewhere other than that NAO report?

Various journalists and others have been onto this for a while, some looking at individual contracts (e.g. here and here) and others at procurement as a whole (e.g. here). We don't know the full dimensions of the problem, not least because some of the documentation has not even been published, but there's ample evidence both of irregularities in awarding and policing individual contracts, and of a wider disregard for the normal processes of public procurement.

But, as I said, you know this already.
 
Heard this in radio this evening. Lords are asking about what took place between Government and EU over ability of musicians to go to EU.

Independent article suggests that UK could not come to a deal over 90 days due to Priti Patel crackdown on immigration.

Government argue that they were trying to get deal for all business trips not just musicians.

EU deny that they would not have done a deal about musicians touring. They have a standard deal which for example USA have with EU.

Sounds like this governments obsession with ending anything that smacks of freedom of movement is the problem.

 
Various journalists and others have been onto this for a while, some looking at individual contracts (e.g. here and here) and others at procurement as a whole (e.g. here). We don't know the full dimensions of the problem, not least because some of the documentation has not even been published, but there's ample evidence both of irregularities in awarding and policing individual contracts, and of a wider disregard for the normal processes of public procurement.

But, as I said, you know this already.
Yes, I know journalists have been 'looking at it' and I completely believe that there will have been all kinds of screw ups. But I keep seeing mention of this kind of thing like "billions of pounds handed to ministers" mates" mentioned without question. And the fact is that nothing like that has been enumerated. It's all lazy commentary, just like conflating emergency procurement processes with privatisation.
 
Establishment networking, sleaze and corruption. A handy compendium. £276 million there for one contract


Our challenge to Government’s decision to hide COVID-19 spending has led it to disclose that the Department of Health has handed £17 billion worth of COVID-19 contracts to private companies since April. Fresh analysis by Tussell reveals Government has failed to publish details of £4.4billion of these contracts.

That post gives another £452 million for two contracts - so £728 million for three conservative-linked contracts, billions sounds fairly likely, particularly if they've not published details of £4.4 billion.

That's just a couple of minutes search - worth looking through that thread for confirmation. And I only searched "billions", searching "millions" should bring up a lot more.
 
Establishment networking, sleaze and corruption. A handy compendium. £276 million there for one contract




That post gives another £452 million for two contracts - so £728 million for three conservative-linked contracts, billions sounds fairly likely, particularly if they've not published details of £4.4 billion.

That's just a couple of minutes search - worth looking through that thread for confirmation. And I only searched "billions", searching "millions" should bring up a lot more.
I'm glad the good law project is pursuing this stuff, and of course the govt should be transparent in where money is going, and they should be made to make that missing info public, and maybe there is info yet to come out. But I see no evidence of corruption on the scale of billions. The NAO report seems to accept the principle that known contacts were given some priority in bidding and of course that will then be seen in the fact that some of these companies have pre existing connections with people in government. The question then is whether they were then allowed to get away with charging extortionate sums as a result. In other words, did the govt pay well over the odds to these companies, compared to what would have been paid to companies with no connections. My reading of the NAO summary is that no, they did not find evidence of this.
 
I'm glad the good law project is pursuing this stuff, and of course the govt should be transparent in where money is going, and they should be made to make that missing info public, and maybe there is info yet to come out. But I see no evidence of corruption on the scale of billions. The NAO report seems to accept the principle that known contacts were given some priority in bidding and of course that will then be seen in the fact that some of these companies have pre existing connections with people in government. The question then is whether they were then allowed to get away with charging extortionate sums as a result. In other words, did the govt pay well over the odds to these companies, compared to what would have been paid to companies with no connections. My reading of the NAO summary is that no, they did not find evidence of this.
Post 3 in that thread:


and the thread is stuffed full of them. Count it up. Billions isn't an exaggeration, but of course we can't know the exact amounts because they won't tell us.
 
I'm glad the good law project is pursuing this stuff, and of course the govt should be transparent in where money is going, and they should be made to make that missing info public, and maybe there is info yet to come out. But I see no evidence of corruption on the scale of billions. The NAO report seems to accept the principle that known contacts were given some priority in bidding and of course that will then be seen in the fact that some of these companies have pre existing connections with people in government. The question then is whether they were then allowed to get away with charging extortionate sums as a result. In other words, did the govt pay well over the odds to these companies, compared to what would have been paid to companies with no connections. My reading of the NAO summary is that no, they did not find evidence of this.
There are none so blind as those that will not see
 
Post 3 in that thread:


and the thread is stuffed full of them. Count it up. Billions isn't an exaggeration, but of course we can't know the exact amounts because they won't tell us.
Post 3 covers stuff that is discussed in the NAO report (I assume published subsequently) that I was pointed to earlier.
 
He’s an adviser to the Board of Trade, Government announces new Board of Trade

That I did not know. Talk about scraping the barrel.


Yes, I know journalists have been 'looking at it' and I completely believe that there will have been all kinds of screw ups. But I keep seeing mention of this kind of thing like "billions of pounds handed to ministers" mates" mentioned without question. And the fact is that nothing like that has been enumerated. It's all lazy commentary, just like conflating emergency procurement processes with privatisation.

I did actually argue directly against that last point, if you remember. But keep trying. Some day I might bite...
 
Bought a CD from Germany on eBay today. £1.47 tax, was not expecting that. Included in the list price, but expected things like CDs to be below some sort of threshold.
 
Back
Top Bottom