Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The Anti-Imperialism of Fools - a General thread

I told no lies about you, and you know it. I'm not going to address the subject again, for your sake.
:D except 'you organized that event', 'this blog's something to do with you', 'you've burned an effigy of mohammed and boasted about it' etc etc etc ad nauseam.
I don't think there's much dispute that Philby was the single most effective spy in history, or that he prolonged the Cold War. The invasion of Albania alone would have made a massive difference--and that's one of his less significant operations.
everything after 'i don't think' redundant.
 
Whereas Big Ian had no large number of followers, and did not how to mobilize them. SEEMS LEGIT.

Ian was sitting on billions of oil revenue or backed by billionaires.
Could you imagine Derry redone with oil billions a palace in the rain :eek::rolleyes:
 
Whereas Big Ian had no large number of followers, and did not how to mobilize them. SEEMS LEGIT.

Paisley was a voice crying in the wilderness. It was blatantly the British state that did the work on all the political and social actions attributed to the old foghorn.
 
Capture6.png


Kosher Restaurant window just been smashed in, UAF will be organising a protest there

not...
 
Heh. I really don't think you want to go there do you?



It's not strange at all. Philby was able to become the most effective spy in history because he was part of the old boy network, and so trusted completely by his colleagues, many of whom had been to school and university with him. There's no equivalent in the USA.


Philby was also pulling one over on Angleton at the CIA, and Angleton was supposed to be a legend of espionage.
 
Philby was also pulling one over on Angleton at the CIA, and Angleton was supposed to be a legend of espionage.

Angleton did suspect him though, long before the Brits. The public school types in MI5 couldn't believe that one of their own might be a traitor.
 
There I agree. This one's not quite as bad as the other two, but really. How anyone can write this and deny being a racist is beyond me:



Once again Flavour, can you tell us how you found out about these "despicable beliefs" please? Did you read them in the Koran?
Mebbes he read them in the various links in the 'other thread' ? The one your banned from:thumbs:
 
I read it this morning. An impassioned open letter to a Frenchman who sympathizes with Islam, describing the oppression she allegedly faced growing up in Morocco.

I'm afraid it just chimes too conveniently for comfort with what the murderous governments of the West want people like her to say. They're dragging out any old malcontent they can find in the Islamic world, pouring money over them and strapping them in front of computers, then blasting whatever they come up with across the world. Propaganda in other words.
Bullshit. It isn't murderous governments asking her to say it. She opposes those governments.

Again, shame on you. Shame on you for not bothering to find out who she is or what she stands for before posting this utter bullshit. It is not them that is 'dragging' her out. It is me. It is me that is quoting her. You clearly know nothing of who she is or what she stands for. And you are an ignorant cunt. One who has defended despicable things on this thread, and dismissed as 'allegedly' this person's account.

You're lost.

Oh, and fuck you. Don't talk to me in future. You're a cunt.

And whoever liked dwyers's post, shame on you too.
 
"clears throat":

In this month's issue of Personality and Individual Differences, a study was published (link is external) that confirms what we all suspected: Internet trolls are horrible people.

Let's start by getting our definitions straight: An Internet troll is someone who comes into a discussion and posts comments designed to upset or disrupt the conversation. Often, in fact, it seems like there is no real purpose behind their comments except to upset everyone else involved. Trolls will lie, exaggerate, and offend to get a response.

What kind of person would do this? Some Canadian researchers decided to find out.

They conducted two online studies with over 1,200 people, giving personality tests to each subject along with a survey about their Internet commenting behavior. They were looking for evidence that linked trolling with the "Dark Tetrad" of personality traits: narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and sadism.

They found that Dark Tetrad scores were highest among people who said trolling was their favorite Internet activity. To get an idea of how much more prevalent these traits were among Internet trolls, see this figure from the pape

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blo...rolls-are-narcissists-psychopaths-and-sadists

Aye, but feeding the troll can be fun and sometimes informative, just as long as you don't take them seriously:thumbs:
 
Bullshit. It isn't murderous governments asking her to say it. She opposes those governments.

Again, shame on you. Shame on you for not bothering to find out who she is or what she stands for before posting this utter bullshit. It is not them that is 'dragging' her out. It is me. It is me that is quoting her. You clearly know nothing of who she is or what she stands for. And you are an ignorant cunt. One who has defended despicable things on this thread, and dismissed as 'allegedly' this person's account.

You're lost.

Oh, and fuck you. Don't talk to me in future. You're a cunt.

And whoever liked dwyers's post, shame on you too.

Sorry you feel that way. I said what I thought. She sounds like a Quisling to me, suspiciously in tune with the Western governments' line, and siding with the aggressor states during wartime. That's truly shameful imo.

And frankly, the way you're raging about it like this suggests to me that there's something else going on with you here.
 
Last edited:
Mebbes he read them in the various links in the 'other thread' ? The one your banned from:thumbs:

There are no links to the Koran in the other thread.

So Flavour must have got his opinions about Islam's "despicable" doctrines from the Western media. He's daft enough to believe what he's told. Not like you though Coley.
 
There are no links to the Koran in the other thread.

So Flavour must have got his opinions about Islam's "despicable" doctrines from the Western media. He's daft enough to believe what he's told. Not like you though Coley.

Never read the the Koran, didn't even bother with the bible, totally boring, I do like a good work of fiction though, but I prefer it to have a basis on reality.
I often enjoy your trolling but can't help but be confused by your obvious religious belief?
Try not to get banned, won't you?
 
Never read the the Koran, didn't even bother with the bible, totally boring, I do like a good work of fiction though, but I prefer it to have a basis on reality.
I often enjoy your trolling but can't help but be confused by your obvious religious belief?
Try not to get banned, won't you?

I'll do me best.

One question for you though: if you've never read the Bible, how do you know it's boring?
 
I'll do me best.

One question for you though: if you've never read the Bible, how do you know it's boring?
Ah Phil, should have remembered who I'm talking to, have never read it in its entirety, just bits that were quoted while in school and other bits that attracted me attention over the years, while I can see the desired result in asking people to see the sense in behaving as a decent society, the resulting emergence of organised religion as a powerbase for " fundamentalist nutters" ( your quote I believe) is somewhat of a disaster?
 
If your a woman growing up in a lot of islamic countrys lifes pretty shit and if the saudis get their way likely to become shitter
 
There are no links to the Koran in the other thread.

So Flavour must have got his opinions about Islam's "despicable" doctrines from the Western media. He's daft enough to believe what he's told. Not like you though Coley.


Let's assume there is nothing despicable in the quran, despite the evidence to the contrary (and yes I am familiar with the quran) and ask this question : what % of Muslims are "quranists" who pay absolutely no heed to any of the hadith? You'll admit they are a tiny minority and that the majority of the differences between Shia and sunni come from, besides the argument over the right to succession and Ali, having different sets of hadith, both of which contain many despicable beliefs. Woman as man's property, life as a test which if we fail is punished by an eternity in hell, and numerous things punishable by death or mutilation. All lovely and defensible, of course.
 
Let's assume there is nothing despicable in the quran, despite the evidence to the contrary (and yes I am familiar with the quran) and ask this question : what % of Muslims are "quranists" who pay absolutely no heed to any of the hadith? You'll admit they are a tiny minority and that the majority of the differences between Shia and sunni come from, besides the argument over the right to succession and Ali, having different sets of hadith, both of which contain many despicable beliefs. Woman as man's property, life as a test which if we fail is punished by an eternity in hell, and numerous things punishable by death or mutilation. All lovely and defensible, of course.

I wouldn't defend literalist interpretation of any religion's Scriptures. I consider all kinds of fundemantalism anathema. I'm not sure that fundamentalism is any more prelevant in Islam than it is in any other world religion at the moment. But even if it is, that isn't an indictment of Islam per se, because it hasn't always been the case. Look at Mughal India or modern Turkey for examples.
 
DWYER, loving the anti-islamophobe stance and everything, but were you not just the other telling us all how the Islamic mind is psychologically amenable to forced conversion (and an inherent part of traditional Islamic culture of course) while us Westerners wouldn't grasp tge concept at all? Is that not a bit islamophobic while we're kicking it about?

Please don't tell us your allowing inconsistencies to creep into your trolling :(
 
DWYER, loving the anti-islamophobe stance and everything, but were you not just the other telling us all how the Islamic mind is psychologically amenable to forced conversion (and an inherent part of traditional Islamic culture of course) while us Westerners wouldn't grasp tge concept at all? Is that not a bit islamophobic while we're kicking it about?

Please don't tell us your allowing inconsistencies to creep into your trolling :(

Dwyer's entire posting career is a sort of Zen exercise in demonstrating the cosmic joke. As the ancient master used to say, "if you meet Dwyer on the road, kill him".
 
Back
Top Bottom