Idris2002
canadian girlfriend
And his island of horrors.like that Moreaux guy, with his hordes of teenage acolytes.
And his island of horrors.like that Moreaux guy, with his hordes of teenage acolytes.
Most important here
A thousand times this.
The situation is even worse than that though, not only are the populist right doing exactly what they need to be doing on messaging, their opponents are doing the exact opposite.
The left to an extent, and liberals to now a far greater extent, has gotten caught up in rhetoric and ideological feedback loops which are openly contemptuous of the people they need to win over. Any contact with left spaces, both online and in the real world, is immediately alienating for people not already inducted into, and willing to accept, various beliefs which run counter to what most people believe. Worse than that, even if they are willing to accept all of those beliefs, if they are a particular identity then essentialist logic dictates that their very presence is unwelcome. The presence of these people is of course necessary for these groups to win power.
Take Clinton campaign surrogate Lena Dunham's posting of a video (still online) calling, features the voices of her and her unbearably annoying father, for the end of white men just a couple of days before the US election. Also, for a less extreme but still stupid example think of Clinton's deporable speech.
It's not confined to the US either, obviously.
EU referendum: Old white men are the problem for the Remain campaign, says Labour's shadow Europe minister « Express & Star
What is it that makes these people so bad at messaging that they are tactically far more inept than far-right twitter trolls?
And his island of horrors.
and you never pass judgment on anyone.
and you never pass judgment on anyone.
Oh gawd
what?
Going to be another round of moaning about how judgemental all are on here?
No no. I wouldnt do that.
The hollow promise of the addict
well an addict, it is true. But dont judge me, if i can ask that.
You can ask
we disagree on certain things,
Hard to tell, you don't say anything.
it is true. I dont talk much about politics on Urban, and dont continue, once I see how it rapidly dissolves.
So much for not moaning
Apologies. I did not mean to do that!
Another heavy night?
You judge people?
You don't?
Sure you do Cheesy. What's the point of this?
He's a fixture on Public Television. He had a series in the 80s where he interviewed Joseph Campbell that's considered a classic:
Joseph Campbell and The Power of Myth | Shows | BillMoyers.com
In the far past he was Press Secretary for the Johnson administration and worked as a news correspondent at CBS.
thats my take on a collective point of view. Which i have every right to express just as you do about anything. However, I would never single out people, be mean or bully them. Because that is cruel Rutitia. Plain cruel.
Different people having the same view doesn't mean they are a collective in a planned, organised way. Plain cruel? Tell that to the trans student Milo singled out, named, publicised their picture and harassed. Cruel? Tell that to the Black actress that Milo instigated and encouraged others to actively, racistly troll. These are just two simple examples of the behaviour you seem to be condoning. Evil is as evil does Cheesy. Calling that out isn't cruel, it's necessary.
What do you question? That these things ever happened? That he had a justifiable reason for being a bullying shit cunt?Im not condoning his behaviour. However I would question some of the charges you are making.
Context? Perhaps you can explain the context to me in which he is justified in being a bullying shit cunt? I've thought about it and given that these are just two examples of his attention seeking nastiness, feel free to provide context and reason for any of the bullying shit cunt things he does/has done.If you look at them in context, are they literally as evil as you say? Have you taken into account his defences? You may have, but doesnt sound like it.
Oh come on Cheesy, that's exactly what you did with this post.You know, I like you a lot as a poster and respect you. If you disagree with me, however, thats fine. I dont judge individuals on that kind of daft basis.
there tends to be a very one-sided, po-faced collective opinion on Urban about characters like him: very suspicious, easily offended, gunning for his (metaphorical) blood , baffled by satire- which is all oh so very very predictable.
What do you question? That these things ever happened? That he had a justifiable reason for being a bullying shit cunt?
Context? Perhaps you can explain the context to me in which he is justified in being a bullying shit cunt? I've thought about it and given that these are just two examples of his attention seeking nastiness, feel free to provide context and reason for any of the bullying shit cunt things he does/has done.
Oh come on Cheesy, that's exactly what you did with this post.
Amongst other things, there is nothing satirical about Milo as well you know.
BlueshirtIm not condoning his behaviour. However I would question some of the charges you are making. If you look at them in context, are they literally as evil as you say? Have you taken into account his defences? You may have, but doesnt sound like it. You know, I like you a lot as a poster and respect you. If you disagree with me, however, thats fine. I dont judge individuals on that kind of daft basis.