editor
hiraethified
So who did it then, whose command were they under and why did they do it?zArk said:Government boffins ... who the fuck has said the government altered the footage?
did i? no i fucking didnt
So who did it then, whose command were they under and why did they do it?zArk said:Government boffins ... who the fuck has said the government altered the footage?
did i? no i fucking didnt
editor said:Again: seeing as you clearly know absolutely fuck all about photo manipulation software and video artefacts, why do you think you know more than the host of imaging experts who would have seen and carefully examined all the first generation images?
A nice simple explanation will do, perhaps continuing on from here: "I, zArk, know that all the imaging experts are all wrong and I am right because....."
So you don't think it a little odd that you - someone who is hopelessly unknowledgeable about image manipulation and video editing - should somehow notice a supposed conspiracy-rumbling anomaly that far, far more qualified people have all managed to miss?zArk said:I don't think the original footage was ever in their possesion. Dont you get what i am saying?
I have said this before:
Why on earth should they waste time being "interviewed on TV"?ZAMB said:What host of imaging experts? Why were they not interviewed on TV when the report came out?
editor said:Why on earth should they waste time being "interviewed on TV"?
editor said:So who did it then, whose command were they under and why did they do it?
Sadly, your 'theory' is a laughable sack of ill-informed shite seeing as it starts with a laughably dumb claim about "7/7 Simulation exercise by VISOR/London Underground – ‘real’ attack on UK."zArk said:ahhh you know my theory about how and why intelligence services have evolved.
Call me crazy if you like, but I reckon there's a better than good chance that the tape may have been watched more than just the once.ZAMB said:Then how do you know that this *host* have examined the tape - except perhaps in your imagination?
editor said:Sadly, your 'theory' is a laughable sack of ill-informed shite seeing as it starts with a laughably dumb claim about "7/7 Simulation exercise by VISOR/London Underground – ‘real’ attack on UK."
zArk said:. . . I've spent 10 years studying and critically analysing sociology and cultural studies predominantly, focussing upon identity, agency and essential self . . .
zArk said:I've spent 10 years studying and critically analysing sociology and cultural studies predominantly
zArk said:. . .
or can you explain the curb distortion?
Bob_the_lost said:1) That area was dug up and resurfaced a while back, sometimes the curbs are replaced when that happens. Image burnt into that frame from way back when.
2) Flaw in the film on that slide.
3) Codec making things too rectangular when digitised.
4) The lizards did it.
A Dashing Blade said:Plesase, I need a laugh at the moment, what is your preferred theory about the "curb distortion"?
(note this is a direct, carefully phrased question)
zArk said:ahhh you know my theory about how and why intelligence services have evolved.
false flag operations conducted in order to secure the nation. This is key to understanding what occured on the 7th July 2005 in london.
The communications problems are being used to push through homeland security
drug cartels and criminal business people are helping to secure the nation
and finally where can we find this new form of terrorism emerging from -- CIA, Mafia (Irish, Italian, Jewish formed Cartels) , Military Intelligence, Anti-Communists, Contras, Mi6, Mi5 all working together.
zArk said:The distorted curb shows that there has been alteration to the photo which totally discredits the photo as 'evidence' that those 4 lads were actually at Luton station around 7.20 am on the morning of the 7th July 2005.
That is the only picture of Luton station 7th July with a time stamp.
How do we know that those 4 lads were actually there? The importance of them being there at Luton Station is paramount to connect them with the 'car full of explosives'.
The photo is fake and there is no other evidence proving that the 4 lads were there. No CCTV on the platform, no cctv inside the trainstation at the ticket stand or barriers like on the 28th.
It is clear the photo was produced to frame 4 lads for the attacks and claim suicide bombers.
Is it that fucking amazing?
The history of the 4 lads has been shown to be totally unrecognisable to the MO of terrorists and futhermore suicide bombers.
Unless there is solid proof that those lads did it, you are blaming innocent people for the mass murder.
You cannot defend the hypothesis produced of 4 suicide bombers if there isnt any proof but if you do, you are sick and twisted. I would even venture racist in that 4 lads who are Muslim and 'foreign looking' 'fit the bill', because when it boils down to the hard facts the only thing that holds the accusations together in the minds of the public is "they were muslims".
Laugh away you pathetic drone. Blame innocent people if you want, fuckhead.
That's all mighty relevant to 7/7 then.zArk said:Ill-informed -- kiss my arse. I've spent 10 years studying and critically analysing sociology and cultural studies predominantly, focussing upon identity, agency and essential self.
jæd said:Ooh look...! A handy directory for all of Zarks crackpot theories and loony ideas....! Got a real live one here...!
So - employing Occam's razor - do you think the 'lads' are now?zArk said:How do we know that those 4 lads were actually there?
editor said:That's all mighty relevant to 7/7 then.
So what are your actual qualifications, in particular in the area of photo and video analysis (for this is the only so-called 'evidence' in regard to 7/7 that you've mustered up in over a year).
Could you explain exactly what you mean here, please?zArk said:Heh, if this turns into entrapment it wouldnt suprise me.
editor said:So - employing Occam's razor - do you think the 'lads' are now?
A Dashing Blade said:Well, that was a waste of taxpayers money wasn't it.
I don't have to "discredit the curb" - I've already offered my far-better-informed opinion on what could may cause any possible anomalies from video footage.zArk said:Oh no, you had my answer and if you wish to discuss it in depth i am willing within another thread as it is does touch into 7/7 but not on the whole.
You have failed to discredit the curb and so have the rest of you. Stick to the curb because that is what is in question.
The photos validity is important if it is to be used as evidence.
editor said:Could you explain exactly what you mean here, please?
Thanks.
Murdered by who? Where? How?zArk said:Dead, murdered.
Can you just stop with the bullshit questions and focus on the curb.
editor said:But seeing as you've decided to boast us about your own supposedly highly relevant expertise,
tarannau said:I'm beginning to think Zark's on a wind up. Surely someone can't really be this delusional, laughable and self-aggrandising can they?
editor said:Murdered by who? Where? How?
What evidence have you to support this theory?
Don't forget the GCSE in Geography (Grade D), the Certificate for Swimming a Width (Pass) and the Bronze Medallion for Lifesaving (Fail).zArk said:BA hons Cultural and Film studies 2:1
MA Social and Cultural Critism and Theory pass