There's no guarantee that the experience would have made her less nutty. I think even Prole accepts that there were explosions and that there was carnage.Badger Kitten said:I am surprised by how angry reading her posts makes me feel. But right now, I find myself wishing with all my heart she had been on the suicide-bombed train.
Which is not wishing her dead, just wishing her conscious.
Steve Lovegrove was standing right next to the adjoining doors between carriage one and carriage two, not far from the site of the explosion. He received superficial injuries. No one on his carriage was killed or seriously injured.Badger Kitten said:I wouldn't hold your breath. She seems to wallow in peddling deceit and has no idea of reality.
As were the MPS and still were one week later.After detailed anti-terrorism staff interview I found out some stuff I needed to share.
The King X bomb was placed at the END of the first carriage, not the first set of doors on the front carriage as reported on the news.
The tube tunnel was very narrow here, and the train was very crowded, which was why most of the people were killed and hurt at the back of carriage 1/ beginning of carriage 2.
I heard this from the counter-terrorism police who took my statement today: the BBC and ITN were wrong in their first reports.
Prole said:Tell you what, I'll stop posting on here and leave you all in peace.
So you really haven't the honesty or the dignity to post up the retraction I've asked for?Prole said:Tell you what, I'll stop posting on here and leave you all in peace.
I wouldn't get your hopes up. Prole's made promises like this in the past.Donna Ferentes said:Rejoice, rejoice
We've lost a halfwit's voice.
I've never understood why some people have such difficulty with this?jæd said:Um.. Its his website, he can do whatever he likes with it..
Thats because some "forensic reports" ARE available to the police. Lots of them. Some would undoubtedly have been available within days. Others over the fiorst few weeks. More as the enquiry has progressed. They were referred to in the narrative. You write the phrase as if they are some indistinguishable whole. They are not. Yet more evidence (as if more were needed!) that you haven't got the fucking first idea what the fuck you are talking about.Prole said:It is even harder to understand why forensics reports are not available to the police yet.
Here's some advice: don't.numeral said:Hi, I'm numeral. I thought I'd carry on where Prole left off.
*hands over bib*numeral said:Hi, I'm numeral. I thought I'd carry on where Prole left off.
Thanks, bye.numeral said:Did anyone see that shrub outside 18 Alexandra Grove on Channel 4 Monday night?
The "cut and paste" tag line and reference to "carrying on where Prole left off" suggests that they weren't on this thread for a serious discussion.JHE said:Was Numeral someone we'd know?
Ludicrous Diversion
On the 7th of July 2005 London was hit by a series of explosions. You probably think you know what happened that day. But you don’t.
The police have, from the onset of their investigation, chosen to withold from the public almost every bit of evidence they claim to have and have provably lied about several aspects of the London Bombings.
The mainstream news has wilfully spread false, unsubstantiated and unverifiable information, while choosing to completely ignore the numerous inconsistencies and discrepancies in the official story.
The government has finally, after a year, presented us with their official ‘narrative’ concerning the event. Within hours it was shown to contain numerous errors, a fact since admitted by the Home Secretary John Reid. They have continuously rejected calls for a full, independent public inquiry. Tony Blair himself described such an inquiry as a ‘ludicrous diversion’. What don’t they want us to find out?
Prole said:I know some of you will call me a lying c***, but I thought I'd just leave you all with this.
editor said:What does that mean, please?
prole, that video is SUPERB, (if rather dark!) my congratulations to whoever produced it.Prole said:I know some of you will call me a lying c***, but I thought I'd just leave you all with this.
BTW Numeral's number was up very quickly, shame 'cos he's a really nice guy.
Watch Video
As the person who originally suggested you for the position of moderation may I say how much I am now regretting it fridgemagnet.FridgeMagnet said:Do you actually need banning in order to fuck off? I can help you out there.
Jazzz said:As the person who originally suggested you for the position of moderation may I say how much I am now regretting it fridgemagnet.
You have gone from being considerate and unemotional to being really high-minded, blaze, smug, and with apparently no desire for self-examination.
Poor show.
Exceptional is right.Jazzz said:I would like to ask fridgemagnet as to how many posts from prole have been reported.
I think she is an exceptional poster, and the reason she receives exceptional hostility here is because she dares to think very differently and is prepared to stand up for her position.
Jazzz said:I would like to ask fridgemagnet as to how many posts from prole have been reported.
I think she is an exceptional poster
If you're a gullible moron, yes.Jazzz said:prole, that video is SUPERB
Like Home Office Narratives?editor said:Why do you swallow such shite from anonymous tossers, Jazzz?
Tell me more about the sci-fi holographic planes from 2025 in that "army manual" you linked to, Jazzz.Jazzz said:Like Home Office Narratives?