I’ve now watched episodes 6 and 7, and while there is a marked improvement, it doesn’t elevate it beyond the average. I’ve no idea why they felt the need for the first 5 episodes. There’s nothing at all that happens in them that you couldn’t pick up from episode 6. Especially since they feel the need to spell everything out and underline it.
Take the chess scene when D’Angelo explains to the two guys using chess pieces to play chess how to play chess. Everything is hammered home until everyone is fed up hearing it, even people in the next room playing on their phones. Yes, we get it: this piece is like that guy, this piece is like this guy. Strategy is like hiding the stash. You mean like we have to stay one step ahead of the other player? Yes, it’s like staying ahead of the other player. What are you like? I’m like a pawn. Yes, you’re like a pawn. But can’t they become queens? But they get sacrificed early on. Wait, you’re telling me a pawn is like a metaphor for me? Oh. My. God. Just show them playing chess! We can do the rest of the work ourselves!
And the conversation about them not being able to work out the pager code. “But it can’t be that hard, these guys understand it”. “So how dumb are we if we can’t crack it?” Leave it unsaid! We had it already. And the guy who eventually cracks the code? Wait, it won’t be the useless, clueless white guy who keeps accidentally firing his service pistol. That’d be too obvious. Oh.
And always hammering home the moral ambiguity of both the cops and the guys in the project, and how they’re all the same - just people trapped by circumstances. This has been a staple of fiction for decades. So we don’t need, for example, the clunking dialogue in the office between Omar and Bunk in the scene when the cops are beating up Bird in the interview room. The cops have torn up the polaroid that we’re told in capital letters is to prove to a judge that Bird had the bruises he’s carrying already. Meanwhile Omar explains he’d never kill a civilian. “A man’s gotta have a code”. “Yes, he’s gotta have a code”. Cue interview room beating sounds.
So, now Bunk and Omar discover they were at school together. But it’s played with such a heavy hand that you’re left rolling your eyes. We get it. They’re all people with a lot in common. And they’re all individuals too. Yes, individuals. You can almost hear the writers’ meeting: “How about having Bunk play a game you don’t expect black guys to play? Like lacrosse. Good idea! We’ll underline how unusual it is by having Omar not know what it’s called. He could maybe say ‘that game with the stick’ or something”.
The characters are all so two dimensional and archetypal it’s incredible. And yet reviews say it’s a show that subverts conventions. Like what? Am I missing something? Is it breaking down the fourth wall by parodying clunky and obvious writing?
Still, on the plus side they have played Miles Davis and Duke Ellington.