and Cherie Blair FFSNEW, apparently she has contacts in Rwanda and and didnt reveal it... Tick tock indeed.
Revealed: Suella Braverman accused of new ministerial code breaches over Rwanda links
Exclusive: Home secretary was the director of a charity providing training to Rwandan government lawyers for five yearswww.independent.co.uk
Immediately nicked that joke.
NEW, apparently she has contacts in Rwanda and and didnt reveal it... Tick tock indeed.
Revealed: Suella Braverman accused of new ministerial code breaches over Rwanda links
Exclusive: Home secretary was the director of a charity providing training to Rwandan government lawyers for five years
Why 'with sadness'? On what basis does this woman deserve compassion?
She's just vile.Secret Home Office policy to detain people with NHS debt at airport found unlawful
Policy was uncovered by defenders of two women repeatedly detained when trying to re-enter the UKwww.theguardian.com
Thank fuckThis seems like a pretty massive abandonment of the whole small boats thing.
Key plank of new UK asylum law dropped to cut backlog
Home Office will no longer distinguish between people arriving by irregular means and other asylum seekers
No ethical conversion, just a change of tack to dispatch as many vulnerable people as they can (with a fanfare of publicity) while downplaying the majority of boat arrivals who have legitimate cases in international law. While sitting on barges with no money.This seems like a pretty massive abandonment of the whole small boats thing.
Key plank of new UK asylum law dropped to cut backlog
Home Office will no longer distinguish between people arriving by irregular means and other asylum seekers
No ethical beliefs to begin with.
Yes, it is significant. I think especially about how they sell this to their red meat base.
With sadness because we’re stuck with her as HS for now. I’m sad about it. I’m sad that she can’t go a day without wrecking more lives. Where did you think I was speaking for compassion for her? I was speaking with compassion for everyone who has to deal with the mounting consequences of her. I’m sad that there are fresh examples so frequently. In that post, I was expressing sadness that not much more than a day can pass without another horror either devised or coming to light.
David Attenborough's coke and whore nights?
Is that his latest series? Is he commentating in a whisper from the wardrobe?
What happens on Boay Mcboatface stays on Boaty Mcboatface
Turns out Boris Johnson misled Parliament ...who'd have thunk it
We're supposed to be on the lookout for something that's news, though.
You're only allowed to make that wager if you're willing to double it if they haven't.
www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk
And good luck to them. However, I wonder about the extent that things which pass through parliament can be considered opposed to the will of Parliament - while liberty make some good points this seems to me potentially something of a flaw in their argumentLiberty is taking legal action against Suella
LIBERTY LAUNCHES LEGAL ACTION AGAINST HOME SECRETARY FOR OVERRIDING PARLIAMENT ON PROTEST POWERS - Liberty
The issue is whether it was correct for the Government to use an SI to reintroduce parts of the Bill which had been defeated in the Commons. It's going to be heaven for lawyers because it's very 'into the weeds' as American podcasts are so fond of saying.
Yes. But the court may take the view that the argument about the will of Parliament is null on things which have been placed before the houses of Parliament and not been rejected.
