discokermit
Well-Known Member
at least they didn't take the tiger with them,
I thought Ming Campbell was the most direct... in criticising Hague ..
Ming was the only person in the chamber that didn't seem to get it.
Everyone else seemed to accept the idea that 'something was going on' that Hague wasn't about to spill the beans on on national tv, and pretty much accepted it.
Everyone else seemed to accept the idea that 'something was going on' that Hague wasn't about to spill the beans on on national tv, and pretty much accepted it.
What mistake?
at least they didn't take the tiger with them,
Why is it that when a policy goes wrong, the Minister in charge has no hesitationin blaming the civil servants or workers charged with implementing their brilliant strategy, and will only admit culpability under extreme duress (this was after all what the famous Paxman/Howard confrontation was initially about). But when a military operation goes belly up, the defence minister takes full responsibility immediately and the 'special' (as in 'special needs' perhaps) forces get off scot free. It seems that UK ministers aren't allowed to criticise these public employees.
Even when British forces were caught in iranian waters and began cracking when their Ipods were brutally placed in the teacher's desk, there was no official sanction. Yet when a social worker, teacher or council worker screws up Ministers are first to condemn them.....
I'm no fan of the military, but if I were on a train or plane that's been hijacked, these are the guys I'd want coming to my rescue. For all those quick to sneer at them, you can have the French come to your rescue. I'll send flowers to your funeral.
The new big thing on the web is all these sites with names like "I Hate France," with supposed datelines of French military history, supposedly proving how the French are total cowards. If you want to see a sample of this dumbass Frog bashing, try this:
www.albinoblacksheep.com/text/france.html
Well, I'm going to tell you guys something you probably don't want to hear: these sites are total bullshit, the notion that the French are cowards is total bullshit, and anybody who knows anything about European military history knows damn well that over the past thousand years, the French have the most glorious military history in Europe, maybe the world.
Before you send me more of those death threats, let me finish. I hate Chirac too, and his disco foreign minister with the blow-dry 'do and the snotty smile. But there are two things I hate more than I hate the French: ignorant fake war buffs, and people who are ungrateful
Why is it so popular to sneer at the French?
["But there are two things I hate more than I hate the French: ignorant fake war buffs, and people who are ungrateful..."
Why is it so popular to sneer at the French?
because as Lord Nelson said you must hate the french like you hate the Devil
Thing is everybody seems to have been/is sending in small units to secure/protect interests and "rescue" foreign nationals, look at the Cloggys that were captured. Hardly could be called a unilateral invasion really.
Article 3 "in accordance with the provisions of article 2", defines certain acts as aggression, such as armed invasions or attacks, bombardments, blockades, armed violations of territory, permitting other states to use one's own territory to perpetrate acts of aggression and the employment of armed irregulars or mercenaries to carry out acts of aggression.
Maybe because military operations are inherently more risky and uncertain than most other things?