X-77 said:do enlighten me oh wise one
No i'd rather just laugh at you.
When you fuigure it out, it will be twice as funny.
X-77 said:do enlighten me oh wise one
rhod said:Bush's Crawford PR fiasco deepens by the day - now he drives straight past her protest to some swanky fundrasing event. (It's a working vacation, remember).
Of course we all know why his handlers won't let him anywhere near Mrs Sheehan, don't we? She has a brain and a tongue, and can actually use them simultaneously. )
I figured it out a long time ago - the same cannot sadly be said for youpbman said:No i'd rather just laugh at you.
When you fuigure it out, it will be twice as funny.
mears said:You brought it up, and now you resort to name calling?
Pretty lame
mears said:And if Saddam were still in power Bush and Blair would have big time credibility in your opinion I'm sure
pbman said:No i'd rather just laugh at you.
When you fuigure it out, it will be twice as funny.
pbman said:You don't really have a clue whats going on here do you?
pbman said:Bush met her allready.
Nope, the biggest risk in the US army is that you might get injured, the 2nd biggest is contracting some form of venereal disease.mears said:Its pretty simple. People have joined or been forced to join armies for thousands of years. Here in the states you volunteer. Her son volunteered. The biggest risk of being in the military is that you might get killed.
Not that you have any first-hand knowledge of that, eh?Because, you know, that is a risk one takes when they join a fighting force.
Is that really the best you can do mears? Have you really no better answers to these question?mears said:And if Saddam were still in power Bush and Blair would have big time credibility in your opinion I'm sure
Now angry, Bush-hating Cindy Sheehan, the mother of a soldier killed in Iraq and co-founder of "Gold Star Families for Peace" – last glorified by ABC in January for protesting President Bush’s "lavish" second inauguration – is being celebrated again as she sits outside Bush’s Texas ranch. On their Saturday evening newscasts on August 6, ABC and CBS touted the Sheehan protest with just "a few dozen people," allowing her to say Bush is enjoying his vacation while "I’m never going to be able to enjoy another vacation because he killed my son."
http://www.mrc.org/BozellColumns/newscolumn/2005/col20050810.asp
Ms. Sheehan’s weeklong protest has galvanized support among other military families whose loved ones have been killed in the war, are presently in Iraq or are set to be deployed. More than 100 people had joined her as of Friday, and more supporters are continually arriving. Their stand has focused a spotlight on opposition to the Bush administration’s war policy among growing sections of the American population.
Largely due to the publicity surrounding Cindy Sheehan’s cause—and mounting support for it—Bush was forced to refer to her by name at a press conference outside his ranch on Thursday. “I sympathize with Mrs. Sheehan,” he said. “She feels strongly about her position. She has every right in the world to say what she believes. This is America.” Bush’s sympathy, however, has not moved him to grant her a meeting.
She's asking a very good question. It's one I think many people would also like to ask Tony Blair.Sheehan: "I don't want the President's sympathy, you know, I want to talk to him, and I want answers to my questions. And I want him to tell me the noble cause that my son died for. <snip>"
Bernie Gunther said:She's asking a very good question. It's one I think many people would also like to ask Tony Blair.
maybe now that big brother is over blair will start getting a rough time of it again...phildwyer said:Why don't they then? The British anti-war movement is pathetic.
X-77 said:maybe now that big brother is over blair will start getting a rough time of it again...
Bernie Gunther said:Well, our media doesn't seem to be game for it yet, so what there is just isn't really being reported or acknowledged by the greater part of the UK media. When did you last see a UK opinion poll on Iraq prominently reported here?
That in itself risks a back-lash. I've picked up a strong sense of frustration in many people that I've talked with, probably going back at least to the last election, and maybe to the pre-war demos. A sense of frustration at having no effective say and at letting Blair back in for the lack of decent choices.
There is a great deal of simmering anger, which Blair's PR people are trying frantically to redirect in ways that line up with their authoritarian agenda.
I don't think that'll work though. I think sooner or later that dam will burst.
I bet peebs is just itching to call her a commie. Go on peebs you savage fucking coward, do it!Bernie Gunther said:Cindy Sheehan, because her status as a greiving mother makes her very hard to smear without causing a back-lash, may be about to find one in the US.
No, I think I probably will be here for the whole month of August, because we know how George is. He’s so arrogant, and he’s so foolish and he won’t listen to reason. And he would rather have a Gold Star Mother and her supporters swelter in the hot, August Crawford sun than to bring me in. Because, you know what? He’s afraid of me. He’s afraid of what I represent. I represent opposition to him, and I represent the truth. And that frightens him, and we all know that he’s a big coward.
Bernie Gunther said:They've got no answers for her, or for the rest of us, about why turning Iraq into a festering pest-hole of terrorism was a brilliant idea and in our interests.
The smears aren't working, they just make them look bad. Meanwhile she's coming out with stuff like this everytime she gets interviewed.
mears, that argument only has a hope of working if invasion had made things better but it's made them far worse with no realistic hope of improvement any time soon.mears said:<snip> If we could only go back...
mears said:If we could only go back...
Quite so.ViolentPanda said:You mean back to the days when your "argument" might have been assessed as having any validity?
Rather than now when it is the equivalent of "Yeah, but..."?
Iran is part of your Leader's axis of evil is it not? Why defend evil? And Kuwait: Elections: none; the monarch is hereditary; prime minister and deputy prime ministers appointed by the monarch. Why defend an anti-democratic shithole like that.mears said:Right, Iraq was much better when it was attacking Iran and Kuwait.