Johnny Canuck3
Well-Known Member
Spion said:which begs the question, why is the legal system inefficient and/or unfair?
Er, because it decrees that a woman who was gang raped is to be whipped?
Spion said:which begs the question, why is the legal system inefficient and/or unfair?
I thought the question was the other way around, as in "Why has the legal system come to be..."Johnny Canuck2 said:Er, because it decrees that a woman who was gang raped is to be whipped?
That's describing it - answering the 'how' question - rather than answering the 'why' questionJohnny Canuck2 said:Er, because it decrees that a woman who was gang raped is to be whipped?
Spion said:That's describing it - answering the 'how' question - rather than answering the 'why' question
What we have with Saudi is a society that was tribal and nomadic to within 3.5 generations ago, with one dominant clan. Then came oil and revenues that solidified that power structure while in some ways modernising it too. Now we have a society that is in some regards very rich, but with social structures and institutions that reflect that lack of development from tribal to modern.
Our society played that sort of development out over hundreds of years and is well-formed (tho not without its fissures). Saudi is like a child that grew to 6'4" in its first 18 months - it's all out of balance and malformed
I don't know the roots of the anti-woman thing in Saudi Islam, and clearly not every Islamic country has the same attitudes to women, so it's not just Islam that's the causeJohnny Canuck2 said:So it's a Saudi thing, as opposed to an islamic thing?
The judges, basing their decision on Islamic law, also decided to sentence the woman and her original blackmailer to lashes for being alone together in his car.
The Saudi Gazette and The Scotsman contributed to this report.
fela fan said:You've gotta actually sit down and really imagine what's going on here, really think about it. A big man with an appalling whip lashing a defenceless woman who's been raped several time 200 times, half turning her into a raw lump of meat, never mind the dreadful damage mentally. And you gotta sit down and think how can people, cousins, fathers, brothers, throw stones at a young woman from their very own family. Throw stones at her head, body, enough times until she collapses and finally dies this torturous death.
Johnny Canuck2 said:How much longer till you pass out?
EddyBlack said:Yes well I was pretty much getting there. Sorry Johnny, I take those comments back.
Sorry Warren.
isvicthere? said:It really brings home the power of cultural conditioning. What appears utterly beastly, and pitilessly barbaric to us is right and desirable to people brought up within a different paradigm. It reminds me of a bloke I used to know who was really left wing. He once honestly admitted to me that had he been a young German in the 1920s he almost certainly would have supported Hitler. It's all about the context.
More like the bloke he refers to is a complete arse. Millions of Germans opposed the rise of Nazism between the wars and many paid with their lives for itGrandma Death said:Sorry thats cultural relativism bollocks.
isvicthere? said:It really brings home the power of cultural conditioning. What appears utterly beastly, and pitilessly barbaric to us is right and desirable to people brought up within a different paradigm.
What appears utterly beastly, and pitilessly barbaric to us is right and desirable to people brought up within a different paradigm
isvicthere? said:It really brings home the power of cultural conditioning. What appears utterly beastly, and pitilessly barbaric to us is right and desirable to people brought up within a different paradigm. It reminds me of a bloke I used to know who was really left wing. He once honestly admitted to me that had he been a young German in the 1920s he almost certainly would have supported Hitler. It's all about the context.
Sure they know what they're doing, but them actually believing it's wrong is quite another_angel_ said:Which is absolute b/s. Anyone dousing someone in petrol and striking a match knows what they're doing.
Who gives a shit whether or not they know it's wrong or not?Spion said:Sure they know what they're doing, but them actually believing it's wrong is quite another
All I said was the blindingly obvious point that the people who do these things obviously think it's right. Why would anyone give a shit about that? I would think that if one was attempting to come up with, for example, a modernising policy in an African or Asian country against, say, bride burning or circumcision then it'd be best to understand why people do such things to be able to educate them out of the practice.CyberRose said:Who gives a shit whether or not they know it's wrong or not?
You might do, and I might do. But if 'some culture thinks its right' then it's clearly not universal, is it?CyberRose said:There are, imo, numerous universal rights and wrongs and just because some culture thinks its right to commit horrible acts of oppression against someone does not make it acceptable.
Fair enough. But poor families in under-developed societies who believe that the things they do will affects their fortunes in life clearly aren't going to drop their age-old practices because somone says, 'that's naughty, stop it!'CyberRose said:Its not acceptable and never will be, and they should be made well aware of that
CyberRose said:Who gives a shit whether or not they know it's wrong or not?
I'm sure some paedophiles think what they are doing is perfectly normal but that doesn't get taken into consideration when sentencing does it?
There are, imo, numerous universal rights and wrongs and just because some culture thinks its right to commit horrible acts of oppression against someone does not make it acceptable. Its not acceptable and never will be, and they should be made well aware of that (don't give me any cultural bollocks about telling other cultures what to do because cultures across Europe used to torture and oppress people until they learned "this wasn't acceptable" - no reason why other cultures can't figure it out too)
Universal rights means they should be applied universally, not that everyone agrees with them (I dare say a fair few people in this country do not agree with universal suffrage)Spion said:You might do, and I might do. But if 'some culture thinks its right' then it's clearly not universal, is it?
I don't think we should tell them they're being naughty, I think we should impose tough sanctions on them like we did with South Africa, isolate them politically.Fair enough. But poor families in under-developed societies who believe that the things they do will affects their fortunes in life clearly aren't going to drop their age-old practices because somone says, 'that's naughty, stop it!'
I think all horrible acts we do not agree with should be challengedNB: I'm not talking about the Saudi state here. I'm talking about the kind of folk practices we find distasteful, like circumcision etc
Well it's not a good point at all._angel_ said:That's a good point. A paedophile has sex/ rapes a child because they believe it's okay. Should we as a society go 'that's okay they just need a bit of re education?'
Acceptable by who?DexterTCN said:Spion was saying that these things are culturally acceptable, where the people practising it live
Yes but I think the point that she was sentenced to 200 lashes in the first place for simply meeting a man that she wasn't related to is worthy of discussion no?invisibleplanet said:You all realise that she won her appeal, don't you?
It sounded like you perhaps thought it less worthy of discussion as she won her appeal. Obviously you didn'tinvisibleplanet said:Did I imply it wasn't worthy of discussion?