So it's basically Bristol but in a desert.We all know that it will rapidly split into an undercity, full of mutants, and the Upper Levels where all the posh people live.
Better the other way round. Build primary schools right next to asbestos factories and you save on transport costs because you hardly need to drive the stuff any distance.
Or, make the kids work in the factory for maximum efficiency.
Makes transport and infrastructure simpler as it's effectively 1D not 2DCan someone please tell me why a 'line' and not a regular type city that sort of emanates from a central point outwards in all directions? Is there some sort of advantage to this design which I'm missing?
Makes transport and infrastructure simpler as it's effectively 1D not 2D
Don't let silly details spoil beautiful idea. Particularly, when then genius who came up with the beautiful idea is liable to send someone round to dismember cheeky naysayers with a bonesaw.Sure, but I'm wondering at what point it becomes impractical say for stuff where there's a central focus which usually relies on pulling people in from all directions. e.g. an airport, a sports event, a central shopping district, or whatever.
If the majority of people live 30, 40, 50 plus miles away somewhere on 'the line', then how's that going to work even?
simpler in a way but also less efficient because things are further away from each other than they need to be.Makes transport and infrastructure simpler as it's effectively 1D not 2D
Can someone please tell me why a 'line' and not a regular type city that sort of emanates from a central point outwards in all directions? Is there some sort of advantage to this design which I'm missing?
Part of the initial promotion was that it would be vehicle-free and all parts would be accessed via a central transport line.
Then maybe we should rename it Neot for twatHas it been mentioned that Neom is a portmanteau, from "neo" (new) and the M is from Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman's first name.
Then maybe we should rename it Neot for twat
Amazing. I'd love to see how they go about carting around their groceries, refuse collection, emergency services, building materials, homeware purchase, etc with no vehicles.
Adam Something did quite a good job of skewering the transport proposals (5:15, though the whole thing is worth watching)Makes transport and infrastructure simpler as it's effectively 1D not 2D
As I understand it you're not going to have residential at one end and industrial at the other end, it will be split up and 'alternated' so everything is close by.Unless you live right by your work the commute will be a fucker.
9 million people crammed on the 8am train will be a joy
Unless you're planning on living there you'll not have to worry about it.A lovely idea until you consider how industry, particularly entertainment, actually works. Perhaps they'll decentralise sports stadiums so there's just a little one on every corner. Or rather than a jewellery quarter they can have a series of jewellery teenths, which doesn't sound like it'd become a pain in the arse to shop for a ring at all.
My team got asked to risk assess this construction project for insurance purposes.
I think my comment to the underwriting team probably consisted of five letters.
I wasn’t thinking pentatonically.There’s quite a lot you can say using only five letters.
Abracadabra?
There’s quite a lot you can say using only five letters.
Abracadabra?
A lovely idea until you consider how industry, particularly entertainment, actually works. Perhaps they'll decentralise sports stadiums so there's just a little one on every corner. Or rather than a jewellery quarter they can have a series of jewellery teenths, which doesn't sound like it'd become a pain in the arse to shop for a ring at all.
My team got asked to risk assess this construction project for insurance purposes.
I think my comment to the underwriting team probably consisted of five letters.
Dick.In theory. But in practice that only gives you fuck, cunt and shit.
OK, arse if you insist, but really.