butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Shh, don't cheek a man of science. I bet he's got a white lab coat on and everything.Interesting that this topic seems to bring out all the idiots
Shh, don't cheek a man of science. I bet he's got a white lab coat on and everything.Interesting that this topic seems to bring out all the idiots
There maybe not as many checkout staff in each store. However I strongly suspect that supermarkets are employing more people year on year. As the number of stores expand I also expect that there is more work to be had working at checkouts. Supermarkets even boast that their new store will create x many new jobs as some kind of fanfare as to why we should welcome them.
What's missing from this picture, obviously, is the quality of employment that's offered and deskilling of work. The effect supermarkets have on local communities with the profits of the business being paid to shareholders with minimal tax burden. Closing of local shops. Marginalisation of local suppliers etc.
Anyway my point again is that ire towards 'scab tills' seems targeted at what I suspect is a relatively small aspect in how supermarkets operate. It misses the bigger picture. For instance through legislation France has been quite effective in taming the march of the mutiple through the high street. Typically the high streets in towns and villages in France more vibrant and varied than in the UK.
Even if automatic tills were outlawed it would do little to restore the varied and diverse high streets which we once had. Whereas if we want more jobs at supermarket checkouts then perhaps we should welcome the 'scab tills' and the ever increasing dominance of the supermarket chain.
That's interesting. I've noticed the workforce be reduced over the last four years. The night crew has nearly halved but our workload hasn't. What would I know, though. I just work in one of these places. Those on days shifts are just pushed around different departments filling roles once taken by full-timers.
When our store was refitted in 2012, job vacancies were announced with great fanfare indeed, and in the local press. Most of the new positions were part-time and most were laid off in the new year (a few months, I suspect once the probationary period had ended). Nothing more than advertising the 'new look' store to potential customers than providing long-term employment.
Sure, more stores means more staff employed overall, but what goes on in individual stores? Staff levels stripped down and those left have more work to do than ever.
That's what 'efficiency' looks like to us.
That's interesting. I've noticed the workforce be reduced over the last four years. The night crew has nearly halved but our workload hasn't. What would I know, though. I just work in one of these places. Those on days shifts are just pushed around different departments filling roles once taken by full-timers.
When our store was refitted in 2012, job vacancies were announced with great fanfare indeed, and in the local press. Most of the new positions were part-time and most were laid off in the new year (a few months, I suspect once the probationary period had ended). Nothing more than advertising the 'new look' store to potential customers than providing long-term employment.
Sure, more stores means more staff employed overall, but what goes on in individual stores? Staff levels stripped down and those left have more work to do than ever.
That's what 'efficiency' looks like to us.
So how do they expect the less physically able or the mentally challenged to deal with the bliiddy things ............. they don't seem very user friendly.
Tbh one of the things I dislike about them is how much of a meal many people make of using them. They're not hard.
That said, fredfelt is right. The problem is supermarkets themselves: automated checkouts are a side issue.
So how do they expect the less physically able or the mentally challenged to deal with the bliiddy things ............. they don't seem very user friendly.
I know a few, mostly elderly, people who like to do a bit of shopping as it gets them out of the house and the interaction with the till assistant is one of their few interactions with other people. these scab tills stop that .
In my local Tesco the guys at the tills know me, they pull out my usual cigarettes ready for me before I get to the counter. The self scan can't compete with human service.So how do they expect the less physically able or the mentally challenged to deal with the bliiddy things ............. they don't seem very user friendly.
I know a few, mostly elderly, people who like to do a bit of shopping as it gets them out of the house and the interaction with the till assistant is one of their few interactions with other people. these scab tills stop that .
They may be not be hard for you, they may not be hard for the majority of shoppers, but for a significant minority they are, which is why from the point of view of the consumer, it's better that there are always sufficient "traditional" staffed tills available for those who prefer them.
And if you really want to get closer to ultimate causes, the problem is capitalism's tendency to concentrate economic power in the hands of the few, and its use of technology to increase profitability. Supermarkets and automated checkouts are both symptoms of those tendencies, rather than causes themselves.
And it'll only come from workers themselves across different retail companies communicating with each other and forcing change on employers....
not true - my local B&Q has started staffing the 'proper' checkouts because people refused to use the robot checkouts. one bloke started it and half a dozen queued up behind him: the checkout 'captain' initially refused, one woman in the queue just left her full trolley and walked out, and suddenly the spotty-faced gimp decided that of course people chould chose which checkouts they used...
i wasn't the bloke, but i did queue up behind him. B&Q here now have at least one proper checkout open whenever i go there...
I've upended baskets of shopping over the till and walked out on two occasions.I've seen people get ANGRY operating these things...
You can do nothing but point and laugh at the kind of buffoons Marxists are. They go to shops to purchase goods they can only afford because of modern mechanisation. The reason they are not living lives of medieval back breaking toil in the fields is mechanisation but because their medieval minds can see a change they are outraged by it. Braying like cavemen that something is different therefore it must be evil.
Ugg see machine, Ugg no like bleeping thing, Ugg smash.
Never understood why B&Q thought self-service was going to catch on. Often bulky or heavy items with seemingly randomly placed barcodes. The machine is the least of yer worries.
What does efficiency mean? What does it mean to the owner? What does it mean to the worker? To the consumer? Is it really just a neutral/positive term as your first lines suggest? Is it bollocks.
not true - my local B&Q has started staffing the 'proper' checkouts because people refused to use the robot checkouts. one bloke started it and half a dozen queued up behind him: the checkout 'captain' initially refused, one woman in the queue just left her full trolley and walked out, and suddenly the spotty-faced gimp decided that of course people chould chose which checkouts they used...
i wasn't the bloke, but i did queue up behind him. B&Q here now have at least one proper checkout open whenever i go there...
This, in my opinion, is a big design problem... leaving cash in these things overnight. They really need to revisit the cash input/output system.
....I object to paying to do the work they used to pay their staff to do....
....I object to paying to do the work they used to pay their staff to do....it would at least make more sense to be able to scan each item as you walk round the shop with a hand-held "thingy" and then you've got the whole thing totted up when you check out...( esp dealing with all those bastard Tesco money off coupons I have clogging up my wallet )
they could keep the staff to do the cash/card payment at the end...they're no more interested in the customers than the staff...
I never read the Express.It's only reactionary Daily Express types and the permanently bewildered who can't work them.