Are you suggesting I'm posh? And what does my response to your tin-foilery have to do with joking about rape?
Rotherham child rape gangs: At least 1400 victims
- Thread starter Ole
- Start date
Are you suggesting I'm posh? And what does my response to your tin-foilery have to do with joking about rape?
Oh ho-ho. You're so humorous.
Since when does a discussion involve having to define commonly-used words? It doesn't, unless the discussion is with people who are mentally-lazy, can't see obvious things and prefer plagiarising social science books to thinking.
I'm from one of the most deprived places in the UK if you want to play prolier than thou btw.
Treacle Toes
Time
Are you suggesting that the sexual abuse of White girls is somehow more funny to people than that of girls who are not White. I think the fact you make a distinction between girls who have been sexually abused on account of their skin colour and imagine others applying a value judgement is more than odd tbh...it's sick.
You are joking about the sexual abuse of young white girls because you are poser. You and almost-everyone else has spent this thread making excuses and avoiding the obvious.
littlebabyjesus
one of Maxwell's demons
'The obvious'? Go on then, enlighten us.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Just fucking state the obvious and fuck off then. Christ.
Treacle Toes
Time
No...you are getting a lot of attention so are not being avoided at all. I just wish you'd come out and own your racism and stop projecting your own value judgements onto everyone else.
Thimble Queen
Called away to another place
All muzzies are peados, obvs.
I think you will find that if you go back and look at my comment it exposes you as a liar and a distorter. You are trying to avoid a discussion of the obvious, and you will resort to anything - anything - including locking people up, ridicule, bullying, abuse, intimidation, lies, and now, it seems, permitting the abuse of young white children.
But to address your point directly, I condemn all forms of sexual abuse, regardless of the circumstances and the race or ethnicity of those involved.
littlebabyjesus
one of Maxwell's demons
Wow.
No, the truth. You and the other self-righteous pruning posers on here are responsible for this.
littlebabyjesus
one of Maxwell's demons
What does that mean? (not on facebook)
Bernie Gunther
Fundamentalist Druid
I just wish he had the stones to actually argue his case using facts and logic.
Pontificating doesn't count and acting snooty doesn't count.
littlebabyjesus
one of Maxwell's demons
It feels like you're skating around what you really want to say. Come on, out with the obvious.
Wilf
Slouching towards Billingham
Do you, for one fucking second, suggest anyone else on this thread is doing anything other than that?
You mean you're familiar with facts and logic? I had gained the opposite impression from looking at this thread, what with the Chief Idiot telling you all that you need to de-couple race from culture. Interesting line, that one.
Treacle Toes
Time
I don't permit the abuse of any childen.
I don't apply a value judgement on account of their skin colour.
I am calling you out on your value judgements, evidenced on this thread which expose you as a liar and distorter, who clearly does care what colour of skin the victims of sexual abuse are, first and foremost. This is clear, made clearer by the fact you continuously refer to all those abused as White.
littlebabyjesus
one of Maxwell's demons
ah ok. Yeah they are very tedious now.
No, we've been sent by MI5.
Learn to read. Then go back and look at my comment and see what I was replying to.
Bernie Gunther
Fundamentalist Druid
Like I say, posturing doesn't convince, you need facts and logic.
The more you posture without actually making a case, the more of a dick you look.
Facts and logic about what or in support of what? And why do you suppose logic is the summit of reason?
toggle
wobbly
what about disabled white children?
do they deserve support, or is it acceptable to say they should be put down?
littlebabyjesus
one of Maxwell's demons
Tell us the obvious. We're clearly missing something.
Similar threads
