dwyer, the radfem?
Latent.
dwyer, the radfem?
Ok. But.. The problem with this hypergamy idea is that it is for some reason supposed to apply only to women, like only women have preferences whilst men will take whatever they can get.You yourself admitted that most women can get loads of offers via online dating or by sitting on a bar stool. Not surprisingly, they respond to the one(s) they regard as the best. Yes, different people have different tastes, but I'm going to hazard a guess that the same minority of men are regarded as most attractive by a majority of women.
and you've no criticism of the methodology or conclusions?Ok. But.. The problem with this hypergamy idea is that it is for some reason supposed to apply only to women, like only women have preferences whilst men will take whatever they can get.
(actually maybe you've got a point there).
As far as I can tell, it's nonsense though.
Look at this for example, these very sad graphs are from Dataclysm, the book by the mathematician who made the OkCupid dating website.
This shows basically that All Men, given the choice, want a 21 year old woman. That's just not going to work out very well for 80% of women, is it.
View attachment 83136 View attachment 83137
not just all men now but all men ever i suppose.Ok. But.. The problem with this hypergamy idea is that it is for some reason supposed to apply only to women, like only women have preferences whilst men will take whatever they can get.
(actually maybe you've got a point there).
As far as I can tell, it's nonsense though.
Look at this for example, these very sad graphs are from Dataclysm, the book by the mathematician who made the OkCupid dating website.
This shows basically that All Men, given the choice, want a 21 year old woman. That's just not going to work out very well for 80% of women, is it.
View attachment 83136 View attachment 83137
Ok. But.. The problem with this hypergamy idea is that it is for some reason supposed to apply only to women, like only women have preferences whilst men will take whatever they can get.
(actually maybe you've got a point there).
As far as I can tell, it's nonsense though.
Look at this for example, these very sad graphs are from Dataclysm, the book by the mathematician who made the OkCupid dating website.
This shows basically that All Men, given the choice, want a 21 year old woman. That's just not going to work out very well for 80% of women, is it.
View attachment 83136 View attachment 83137
I recommend the book. It's a good one, if thoroughly depressing. The data above is very different from the data he got from analysing what people say, in public, that they find attractive, But that's what makes it a good book.and you've no criticism of the methodology or conclusions?
I know. And I think maybe that's the main thing that has to change for Roosh & Co to lose their audience.Key phrase highlighted. Most men don't have lots of women throwng themselves at them, whereas most women get interest from lots of men.
Ok. But.. The problem with this hypergamy idea is that it is for some reason supposed to apply only to women, like only women have preferences whilst men will take whatever they can get.
(actually maybe you've got a point there).
This shows basically that All Men, given the choice, want a 21 year old woman. That's just not going to work out very well for 80% of women, is it
Confirmation bias.
Performance usually has a determined outcome, though. WTF do MRAs get out of it, except to deepen their self-hate and general misanthropy?
most women get interest from lots of men.
Is sociobiology politically beyond the pale ?Although I don't usually give much credence to sociobiology, it does seem true that heterosexual men discriminate in favor of women of child-bearing age. One doesn't have to be a genius to see why that particular preference might have arisen.
Yep. A guy this morning just stood there in the street and said 'hello', or something. I've only ever done that to a man once, ever, and I was drunk, and it led to a ten year on and off relationship. . There's the real problem that Roosh feeds off. . maybe.A guy did try to chat me up in a bar last night though tbf
Yes.Is sociobiology politically beyond the pale ?
righto, was just checking.Yes.
Because that would mean that capitalism is not entirely and singularly to blame, for everything ?Why is it hard to believe that behaviour/psychology might have been subject to and influenced by natural selection?
Because that would mean that capitalism is not entirely and singularly to blame, for everything ?
Human nature = some sort of sociobiology, right? So that's not ok.Capitalism isn't an ultimate cause though is it? It's just a consequence of human nature.
Is giant squid nature made by giant squid relations? Probably. But.. what?Isn't that circular? Isn't human nature made by human relations?
Why is it hard to believe that behaviour/psychology might have been subject to and influenced by natural selection?
Capitalism isn't an ultimate cause though is it? It's just a consequence of human nature.
Isn't that circular? Isn't human nature made by human relations?
Gosh. Impressive. The whole nature / nurture debate, and vast fields of recent research, all laid to rest in one fell sentence. Excellent, that's all sorted then."Human nature" is a product of culture, not a product of nature.
Gosh. Impressive. The whole nature / nurture debate put to bed in one fell sentence. Excellent, that's all sorted then.
"Human nature" is a product of culture, not a product of nature. It's a euphemism for the normative social behaviour in a particular place, at a particular time. What is termed "human nature" in one locale, may not be catgorised similarly elsewhere.
is men wanting a younger woman not again a status thing, it is something they desire to increase their social status, it's socialised sureley?
from that graph it shows men have fantastical preferences and women have realistic ones