Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Roosh V, Pro-Rape Pick Up Artist, Announces Worldwide 'Tribal Meetings'

it's also been proven that men over exaggerate their numbers due to social pressure stud status, you ain't a man unless you are fucking a different bitch every night init and on the other hand women under report their numbers because of the social stigma of being the local bike branded a dirty slag

That's what the researchers say innit.

Personally though I'm not so sure. The surveys are anonymous, so there seems no reason to lie. Unless they're lying to themselves, which I guess is possible. But I think it's more likely that 80% of the women really are chasing 20% of the men. That's what I'd do if I was a woman-actually I'd chase just the top 1%, because the vast majority of men are hideous creeps.
 
That's what the researchers say innit.

Personally though I'm not so sure. The surveys are anonymous, so there seems no reason to lie. Unless they're lying to themselves, which I guess is possible. But I think it's more likely that 80% of the women really are chasing 20% of the men. That's what I'd do if I was a woman-actually I'd chase just the top 1%, because the vast majority of men are hideous creeps.

I'd spend more than five minutes doing research if I were you.
 
That's what the researchers say innit.

Personally though I'm not so sure. The surveys are anonymous, so there seems no reason to lie. Unless they're lying to themselves, which I guess is possible. But I think it's more likely that 80% of the women really are chasing 20% of the men. That's what I'd do if I was a woman-actually I'd chase just the top 1%, because the vast majority of men are hideous creeps.

even though a survey is anonymous it doesn't stop the subconscious thinking what if this is seen by a person, what if everyone else is higher, self esteem is still present, people lie to themselves about who they are all the time
 
even though a survey is anonymous it doesn't stop the subconscious thinking what if this is seen by a person, what if everyone else is higher, self esteem is still present, people lie to themselves about who they are all the time

True enough.

I suspect there's also quite a bit of leeway with the definition of "sex," as Bill Clinton taught us. I bet the men count blow-jobs and hand-jobs, conniving sneaks that they are.
 
You never knew I cared eh?

Seriously though, consider this--the result of an exhaustive five minutes of research.

When women and men are asked how many sexual partners they've had, the male average is always more than twice as high as the female. The reason for this is that a small number of men have absolutely loads of sex partners: 5% of men report having over 100 women, while only 1% of women report having over 100 men. Also, 80% of women pass their genes to the next generation, while only 40% of men do.

From this, or from something else, experts deduce that 20% of men get 80% of women, which is pretty much what I said before. It seems to be called the "Pareto Principle."

of course, you've ignored an alternative explanation for these figures - society's attitude towards sexually active men and sexually active women. this will widely lead to men overstating and women understating the number of sexual partners they have had.
 
That's what the researchers say innit.

Personally though I'm not so sure. The surveys are anonymous, so there seems no reason to lie. Unless they're lying to themselves, which I guess is possible. But I think it's more likely that 80% of the women really are chasing 20% of the men. That's what I'd do if I was a woman-actually I'd chase just the top 1%, because the vast majority of men are hideous creeps.


ah, so not only do you know exactly what women want better than women do, but you know more about sexuality than the people doing research in the field.
 
the ape argument is offensive because it reduces people to a primitive level, we are long past that, we have respect and morals and tact and conscience, the ape argument assumes that we are still making spears out of flint, its thoroughly redundant

I think you'll find that our ancestors who made spearheads out of flint were largely Homo Sapiens, like ourselves.

Joey: "Hey Ross, if Homo Sapiens were like Homo Sapiens, is that why they died out?"

Ross: "Joey, Homo Sapiens are people."

Joey: "Hey, I'm not judging here".
 
I think you'll find that our ancestors who made spearheads out of flint were largely Homo Sapiens, like ourselves.

Joey: "Hey Ross, if Homo Sapiens were like Homo Sapiens, is that why they died out?"

Ross: "Joey, Homo Sapiens are people."

Joey: "Hey, I'm not judging here".


ok then thats me told right lol

everything relates to the primitive times not the world we have created for ourselves if you like

SPEARHEADS.
 
What findings: the ones that lump gorillas, chimpanzees, and 'primitive human tribes' into one basket?

Them's the ones. Poor methodology, but the results are accurate enough.

I have to say, I'm totally loving this Manosphere business now. Absolute rubbish, most if it, but comedy gold. Especially the acronyms. Whenever someone says "NAWALT" you have to become a "MGTOW" apparently. Who knew about this stuff?
 
Back
Top Bottom