Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact
  • Hi Guest,
    We have now moved the boards to the new server hardware.
    Search will be impaired while it re-indexes the posts.
    See the thread in the Feedback forum for updates and feedback.
    Lazy Llama

Roosh V, Pro-Rape Pick Up Artist, Announces Worldwide 'Tribal Meetings'

Which bit?

No, hang on. Surely the offspring of a Neanderthal and a homo sapiens would have been infertile? Like a mule?

Apparently not, no. There's one famous case of an adolescent fossil that seems to show both Homo Sap. and Neanderthal traits, but that one has been debated for years over what it really means.

The modern DNA research that Trudeau's biggest fan Johnny Canuck3 refers to above has more or less nailed it there is a little Neanderthal in all of us.

(I've been to the Neander valley - nice place, good museum)
 
Apparently not, no. There's one famous case of an adolescent fossil that seems to show both Homo Sap. and Neanderthal traits, but that one has been debated for years over what it really means.

The modern DNA research that Trudeau's biggest fan Johnny Canuck3 refers to above has more or less nailed it there is a little Neanderthal in all of us.

(I've been to the Neander valley - nice place, good museum)

You took a meander in the Neander?

Sounds nice.
 
I find that what people say they find sexually exciting is very often different from what they actually do find sexually exciting. I find this to be true of men and women alike.
No, it's the difference between what people like the idea of and what people like to experience.

eg. I might like the idea of giving you a bloody nose, but dislike the damage it would probably do to my knuckles, not to mention the mess caused.
 
Svante Paabo's book, Neanderthal Man, is an interesting read. In it he shows that early humans and Neanderthals interbred to produce modern humans.
 
And to think phildwyer doubted me.

Well you learn something new every day it seems.

And now we have the "Denisovans" to consider as well, apparently. This could get really sinister too, because an exhaustive three minutes of research reveals the possibility that certain groups of homo sapiens (pygmies, the indiginous negritos of India, some Papuans) are more closely related to such archaic humanoids than others.
 
Well you learn something new every day it seems.

And now we have the "Denisovans" to consider as well, apparently. This could get really sinister too, because an exhaustive three minutes of research reveals the possibility that certain groups of homo sapiens (pygmies, the indiginous negritos of India, some Papuans) are more closely related to such archaic humanoids than others.
I'm going to stick my neck out and say that this sounds like bullshit to me, and that I'm going to check the peer reviewed literature on this the next time I get the chance.
 
I dunno what your problem is tbh must be shit getting this tense about shit on a forum

it's something I aint giving a fuck about anyways, yer funny lol
 
I'm going to stick my neck out and say that this sounds like bullshit to me, and that I'm going to check the peer reviewed literature on this the next time I get the chance.

Me too. But I have to say, the popular literature on this doesn't look good. Yet another reason to abandon biological determinism I guess:

"In follow-up studies,researchers identified people who had inherited about 3 percent of their DNA from the Denisovans, as well as 4 percent to 6 percent of their DNA from Neanderthals. These people are found in a patchwork quilt of populations on islands of Southeast Asia, including Melanesians in Papua New Guinea, aboriginals in Australia, and Negritos in the Philippines. Researchers are searching for new fossils of Denisovans in Asia. But for now, they’re in the curious position of having a genome in search of a substantive fossil record of this new kind of human."

Hookup Culture 100,000 Years Ago: Homo sapiens Would Mate with Absolutely Anybody
 
Back
Top Bottom