Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Roosh V, Pro-Rape Pick Up Artist, Announces Worldwide 'Tribal Meetings'

So now you're going to deny that men are primarily sexually attracted by women's bodies?
Here's a useful tip: any man who denies that physical appearance is the primary motive informing his sexual attraction is a liar and a scoundrel. Avoid such at all costs.

Thanks for the tip will bear it in mind. But no, you fool. that's not what i was saying: You seem to be arguing that 'male sexuality' = all about physical attraction, whilst women don't care one way or the other about male beauty, which is .. kind of astonishingly stupid.
 
Thanks for the tip will bear it in mind. But no, you fool. that's not what i was saying: You seem to be arguing that 'male sexuality' = all about physical attraction, whilst women don't care one way or the other about male beauty, which is .. kind of astonishingly stupid.

I'm saying that beauty is not the primary factor informing women's sexual attraction.

The primary factor informing women's sexual attraction is power/ status/ dominance.

The primary factor informing men's sexual attraction is physical appearance.

Of course this is not true of all men or all women. It is a general rule. But general rules are important to grasp and understand. Don't mention it.
 
Thing is, I don't think these misogynistic types actually want to get laid. Whether they do or not, it's just another reason to hate women.

Good point, I wondered why anyone would want to have sex with people they have such contempt for, what do they get out of it?
 
Good point, I wondered why anyone would want to have sex with people they have such contempt for, what do they get out of it?

See, here's a good example.

What do these men get out of it? Sex with someone physically attractive. That's all they want.

In sharp contrast, the vast majority of women would never willingly have sex with someone they held in contempt.

That's the difference right there. Anyone who says anything else is a liar.
 
Good point, I wondered why anyone would want to have sex with people they have such contempt for, what do they get out of it?
Dominance, feeling of superiority over the woman you've just tricked into sleeping with you, pleasure from the pain you (percieve you) cause them by not entering a relationship / giving into their feminine wiles and tricks designed to enmasculate men.
 
See, here's a good example.

What do these men get out of it? Sex with someone physically attractive. That's all they want.

In sharp contrast, the vast majority of women would never willingly have sex with someone they held in contempt.

That's the difference right there. Anyone who says anything else is a liar.
It's also obvious from the dickhead's screed that he actually hates sex, and hates himself for having sex, and that he associates the act with impurity and pollution, and that he blames women for this. That's what's going on in his fucked-up head.
 
That's why I was careful to distinguish between sexual attraction and social attraction. Power/ status/ dominance have little effect on the latter.. They have an enormous effect on the former.
And what about people who are sexually attracted to tractors? Women who like to be Dom in bdsm? I disagree completely with your theory, but even if it held up, to then say that the three factors, in application, are used/considered/applied simultaneously makes your break-down irrelevant. It's rubbish though, so as you were :thumbs:
 
I'm saying that beauty is not the primary factor informing women's sexual attraction.

The primary factor informing women's sexual attraction is power/ status/ dominance.

The primary factor informing men's sexual attraction is physical appearance.

Of course this is not true of all men or all women. It is a general rule. But general rules are important to grasp and understand. Don't mention it.

Don't you think that what explains the very existence of Roosh & Co is exactly the fact that this is changing now, fast, and that they hate the modern world for that reason?
I mean, a woman who no longer needs a man to provide for her will make different sexual choices, right? That's what these red pill idiots are so angry about, the erosion of the their whole regressive idea of what real men and real women are supposed to be, no?
 
Last edited:
Because that magazine is published by a media that makes broad guesses about what attracts women.

Not true, and this I do know for a fact. Playgirl was conceived as a magazine for gay men. That's what it was intended to be, and that's what it always was.
 
Don't you think that what explains the very existence of Roosh & Co is exactly the fact that this is changing now, fast, and that they hate the modern world for that reason?
I mean, a woman who no longer needs a man to provide for her will make different sexual choices, right? That's what these red pill idiots are so angry about, the modern world etc, the erosion of the their whole regressive idea of what real men and real women are supposed to be, no?

Yes, women are now free to express their true sexuality. And what they're expressing is hypergamy.

That's unwelcome to Roosh and company, because they still believe that women's sexuality should take moral factors into consideration. They think that being a "nice guy" should make them attractive to women. They freak out when they discover that is not the case, and they're discovering it now.
 
Not true, and this I do know for a fact. Playgirl was conceived as a magazine for gay men. That's what it was intended to be, and that's what it always was.

Here's some stats for you. Women watch less porn than men, that's true.
But you can't sit there and say they are just not interested. Especially in the Philipines :confused:
The study in the link is really interesting if you're curious.

Screen Shot 2016-02-05 at 16.43.10.png

More of What Women Want – Pornhub Insights
 
Yes, women are now free to express their true sexuality. And what they're expressing is hypergamy.
Absolute nonsense. Just think about it. That's exactly what they are no longer forced by economic imperatives to do. Read Roosh on the terrible corrosive role of the welfare state in allowing women to live without men, for instance, let alone this dreadful thing of women actually working, outside the kitchen.
 
Here's some stats for you. Women watch less porn than men, that's true.
But you can't sit there and say they are just not interested.

I didn't say they weren't interested. I said they weren't primarily motivated by physical appearance. So the real question is what kind of porn they're watching. I'd be willing to bet that it's largely lesbian porn, which once again proves my point.
 
Here's some stats for you. Women watch less porn than men, that's true.
But you can't sit there and say they are just not interested. Especially in the Philipines :confused:
The study in the link is really interesting if you're curious.

View attachment 83075

More of What Women Want – Pornhub Insights

Considering how active the philipines are in the webcam sex trade currently, I wonder if thats linked and similar in some of the other top countries.
 
Everything you say is bullshit, isn't it. :rolleyes:

I've no idea why you'd find it unlikely that I know people who worked for Playgirl.

But leaving that aside, the people who actually bought it were gay men. Do you think the publishers didn't do their marketing research?
 
I believe gay (male) porn is more popular with women actually.

main-qimg-ab209bab05bf9e9268053a39b75a66f0


Yaoi - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

South Park can be incredibly educational.:)
 
It is true. Women watch mainly lesbian porn. Why do you find this odd? Seems perfectly predictable to me.
You've gone from you'd 'be willing to bet' to 'it is true' in minutes.
Well it's interesting that you believe that, because it is not true. Women prefer lesbian porn over other types. That is true. Whether you believe it or not.
Prove it.
 
Back
Top Bottom