Not really. It just proves that homosexual men sometimes buy dirty magazines.
It also proves that women don't.
Why do you think that is?
Not really. It just proves that homosexual men sometimes buy dirty magazines.
So now you're going to deny that men are primarily sexually attracted by women's bodies?
Here's a useful tip: any man who denies that physical appearance is the primary motive informing his sexual attraction is a liar and a scoundrel. Avoid such at all costs.
Thanks for the tip will bear it in mind. But no, you fool. that's not what i was saying: You seem to be arguing that 'male sexuality' = all about physical attraction, whilst women don't care one way or the other about male beauty, which is .. kind of astonishingly stupid.
Thing is, I don't think these misogynistic types actually want to get laid. Whether they do or not, it's just another reason to hate women.
Good point, I wondered why anyone would want to have sex with people they have such contempt for, what do they get out of it?
Good point, I wondered why anyone would want to have sex with people they have such contempt for, what do they get out of it?
It also proves that women don't.
Why do you think that is?
Dominance, feeling of superiority over the woman you've just tricked into sleeping with you, pleasure from the pain you (percieve you) cause them by not entering a relationship / giving into their feminine wiles and tricks designed to enmasculate men.Good point, I wondered why anyone would want to have sex with people they have such contempt for, what do they get out of it?
It's also obvious from the dickhead's screed that he actually hates sex, and hates himself for having sex, and that he associates the act with impurity and pollution, and that he blames women for this. That's what's going on in his fucked-up head.See, here's a good example.
What do these men get out of it? Sex with someone physically attractive. That's all they want.
In sharp contrast, the vast majority of women would never willingly have sex with someone they held in contempt.
That's the difference right there. Anyone who says anything else is a liar.
And what about people who are sexually attracted to tractors? Women who like to be Dom in bdsm? I disagree completely with your theory, but even if it held up, to then say that the three factors, in application, are used/considered/applied simultaneously makes your break-down irrelevant. It's rubbish though, so as you wereThat's why I was careful to distinguish between sexual attraction and social attraction. Power/ status/ dominance have little effect on the latter.. They have an enormous effect on the former.
I'm saying that beauty is not the primary factor informing women's sexual attraction.
The primary factor informing women's sexual attraction is power/ status/ dominance.
The primary factor informing men's sexual attraction is physical appearance.
Of course this is not true of all men or all women. It is a general rule. But general rules are important to grasp and understand. Don't mention it.
Hatred. Fuel for the misogyny.Good point, I wondered why anyone would want to have sex with people they have such contempt for, what do they get out of it?
Because that magazine is published by a media that makes broad guesses about what attracts women.
troll.In sharp contrast, the vast majority of women would never willingly have sex with someone they held in contempt.
That's the difference right there. Anyone who says anything else is a liar.
Not true, and this I do know for a fact. Playgirl was conceived as a magazine for gay men. That's what it was intended to be, and that's what it always was.
Don't you think that what explains the very existence of Roosh & Co is exactly the fact that this is changing now, fast, and that they hate the modern world for that reason?
I mean, a woman who no longer needs a man to provide for her will make different sexual choices, right? That's what these red pill idiots are so angry about, the modern world etc, the erosion of the their whole regressive idea of what real men and real women are supposed to be, no?
I've never believed it before, but I'm beginning to believe everyone when they say you're just a troll.
Not true, and this I do know for a fact. Playgirl was conceived as a magazine for gay men. That's what it was intended to be, and that's what it always was.
Absolute nonsense. Just think about it. That's exactly what they are no longer forced by economic imperatives to do. Read Roosh on the terrible corrosive role of the welfare state in allowing women to live without men, for instance, let alone this dreadful thing of women actually working, outside the kitchen.Yes, women are now free to express their true sexuality. And what they're expressing is hypergamy.
Here's some stats for you. Women watch less porn than men, that's true.
But you can't sit there and say they are just not interested.
I really do know this for a fact. I know people who worked for Playgirl.
Absolute nonsense. Just think about it. That's exactly what they are no longer forced by economic imperatives to do.
Here's some stats for you. Women watch less porn than men, that's true.
But you can't sit there and say they are just not interested. Especially in the Philipines
The study in the link is really interesting if you're curious.
View attachment 83075
More of What Women Want – Pornhub Insights
I didn't say they weren't interested. I said they weren't primarily motivated by physical appearance. So the real question is what kind of porn they're watching. I'd be willing to bet that it's largely lesbian porn, which once again proves my point.
Everything you say is bullshit, isn't it.
I believe gay (male) porn is more popular with women actually.I didn't say they weren't interested. I said they weren't primarily motivated by physical appearance. So the real question is what kind of porn they're watching. I'd be willing to bet that it's largely lesbian porn, which once again proves my point.
Well it proves your point, because you made the assumption, not because you know that its true.
I believe gay (male) porn is more popular with women actually.
I believe gay (male) porn is more popular with women actually.
You've gone from you'd 'be willing to bet' to 'it is true' in minutes.It is true. Women watch mainly lesbian porn. Why do you find this odd? Seems perfectly predictable to me.
Prove it.Well it's interesting that you believe that, because it is not true. Women prefer lesbian porn over other types. That is true. Whether you believe it or not.