If they confirm my bias, they're evidence.
My (female) French colleague once said to me, "polyandry has always existed, women just don't tell men about it".
Often its just the difference between people who have something going on in their lives and those who don't. I've met many men that would otherwise be acceptable, not have anything to say because they do nothing in their lives other than eat take-out and play video games. Someone who goes out and actually does things (anything) is going to be more interesting to talk to by default.
And what about all the ones that don't?Oh please. If you really need to be shown an example: women marry older men, men marry younger women.
This is such a load of horse shit. The kind of horse shit that people like RooshV capitalise on. Women are attracted to all kinds of different qualities, and each individual person will afford those qualities with status, if that's what you want to call it, but that doesn't = women are attracted to status. Charisma? I mean come on. I know people of wildly different 'status' who have charisma.Of course there are exceptions, no-one denies that (except maybe Roosh). But in general, as a general rule, and in general terms, women are attracted to men because of status--whether that is expressed in terms of money, fame, intelligence, popularity or charisma.
phildwyer Do you ever get the feeling that you're missing the point, really badly, when you confuse the results of patriarchy with some sort of innate thing called "women's sexuality"?
What? This is bollocks Phil.Anything? Really? You think a garbageman is as sexually attractive to women as a CEO? Really?
I think you're confusing the social with the sexual. Women can certainly find a garbageman more socially attractive than a CEO. But not as sexually attractive.
You're talking absolute bollocks now. But of course you are, because you don't know the first thing about what 'women in general' are attracted to.Anything? Really? You think a garbageman is as sexually attractive to women as a CEO? Really?
I think you're confusing the social with the sexual. Women can certainly find a garbageman more socially attractive than a CEO. But not as sexually attractive.
And what about all the ones that don't?
Women are attracted to all kinds of different qualities
You're just cross because you were quite looking forward to Saturday night's tribal gathering, weren't you.Are women sexually attracted to weakness?
Again, they may very well be socially or morally attracted to weakness. But not sexually.
What? This is bollocks Phil.
Anything? Really? You think a garbageman is as sexually attractive to women as a CEO? Really?
I think you're confusing the social with the sexual. Women can certainly find a garbageman more socially attractive than a CEO. But not as sexually attractive.
I think you have it backwards.
BTW, there's some damn hot garbagemen out there. Or, how about a pig farmer:
Bonobos have more fun.
Anything? Really? You think a garbageman is as sexually attractive to women as a CEO? Really?
I think you're confusing the social with the sexual. Women can certainly find a garbageman more socially attractive than a CEO. But not as sexually attractive.
I think you have it backwards.
BTW, there's some damn hot garbagemen out there. Or, how about a pig farmer:
Just because you've decided these 'general rules' doesn't mean they're true. You're "proving" them with your observation. By that rule I can "disprove" them with my own, or my own experience. People don't have relationships, or even sex, based always and only on social, moral or sexual attraction in isolation.They are exceptions to the general rule.
Are women sexually attracted to weakness?
Again, they may very well be socially or morally attracted to weakness. But not sexually.
You are aware, I take it, that the readership of "Playgirl" was 99% male?
Which kind of proves my point innit.
Thing is, I don't think these misogynistic types actually want to get laid. Whether they do or not, it's just another reason to hate women.male bonobos get laid *all the time* which is what I thought these PUA scum wanted? Surely the lesson they should take from Bonobos vs Chimps is that if they want to get laid they should be more like bonobos and not like chimps!
Gross.
No no Thora, dwyer has already explained that women don't care about that sort of thing, that's "male sexuality" you're thinking of.If we're just talking sexually, then a sexy bin man is much more attractive than an ugly CEO
My point however is that men are sexually attracted by women's bodies. Which is just as amoral, and arguably worse.
People don't have relationships, or even sex, based always and only on social, moral or sexual attraction in isolation.
This, don't give the silly man the air.Guys and gals, just remember that phildwyer isn't a real character, he's an internet persona created for wind-up purposes.
If there's one thing I hate it's a grasser.Be wary of any man who keeps a pig farm.
No no Thora, dwyer has already explained that women don't care about that sort of thing, that's "male sexuality" you're thinking of.