Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Question Time tonight

I remember someone saying (I think it was the tory :confused:) about Kensington being one of the richest boroughs in the country yet having one of the cheapest council taxes - regret I can't remember the full quote either, but this is exactly the same here in Wandsworth :mad::mad::mad:
 
Comedy ejection of polka-dot man

He didn't go down well at all. Completely misread the mood of the audience in the room and they were pleased to see the back of him and his visually repulsive shirt.
Now, millions of people are angry after recent events, there has been a political swing in the UK and he was right about the make up of the panel but that doesn't mean that people are gonna suddenly start liking the shouty and the entitled.
 
He didn't go down well at all. Completely misread the mood of the audience in the room and they were pleased to see the back of him and his visually repulsive shirt.
Now, millions of people are angry after recent events, there has been a political swing in the UK and he was right about the make up of the panel but that doesn't mean that people are gonna suddenly start liking the shouty and the entitled.
what political swing has there been in your opinion?
 
what political swing has there been in your opinion?

I think that the general election result has been the most exciting one in over 40 years with a socialist candidate bringing the labour party back from the dead to make it appealing to working class voters again.
 
Heard this quoted last night :D

th






2017_25_zombie_pm_med.jpg
 
I dislike this idea that 80% of people voted for Brexit parties at the GE. Most of this is made up of the vote for two parties whose leaders, past and present, backed remain, and now are carrying out the edict from the referendum. Saying that they're definitively "Brexit parties" is a very odd interpretation.
 
The Secretary of State for International Development is on tomorrow night, so let's hope they all discuss and support Fox-hunting.
 
Have a read through the thread.
I'm familiar with it, the charge is that the Canary is more clickbait than not. Fine, I'm not disputing that. What I am trying to understand is why one of its editors, founders even, should be a disappointing pick on Question Time, which is a completely different format. Does she hold questionable views? Is she poor at comporting herself in a manner befitting the format of the show?
 
I'm familiar with it, the charge is that the Canary is more clickbait than not. Fine, I'm not disputing that. What I am trying to understand is why one of its editors, founders even, should be a disappointing pick on Question Time, which is a completely different format. Does she hold questionable views? Is she poor at comporting herself in a manner befitting the format of the show?

You aren't familiar with the 'charge'. Read the thread, because it answers the questions that you are asking.
 
Much as I hate the Canary, you have to accept they have become a significant media voice recently - so by QT's own measures, Mendoza is due her place on the show. It's only disappointing in the way that QT's booking policy is consistently disappointing.
 
Much as I hate the Canary, you have to accept they have become a significant media voice recently - so by QT's own measures, Mendoza is due her place on the show. It's only disappointing in the way that QT's booking policy is consistently disappointing.

I wouldn't mind so much if she was going on there just as the person in charge of The Canary, but in reality it's someone with pretty dodgy views going on there to represent the left.
 
Much as I hate the Canary, you have to accept they have become a significant media voice recently - so by QT's own measures, Mendoza is due her place on the show. It's only disappointing in the way that QT's booking policy is consistently disappointing.

Why is she due a place on the show? What in her analysis/political work/life experience merits exposure on national tv?

The fact that her shit politics - which are damaging - have a following on social media doesn't mean that they aren't shit politics.
 
Why is she due a place on the show? What in her analysis/political work/life experience merits exposure on national tv?

The fact that her shit politics - which are damaging - have a following on social media doesn't mean that they aren't shit politics.
You've seen the other guests on question time, right?
 
Why is she due a place on the show? What in her analysis/political work/life experience merits exposure on national tv?

The fact that her shit politics - which are damaging - have a following on social media doesn't mean that they aren't shit politics.

She went to Oxford so she will be able to get on well with the rest of the panel...
 
It's a fist of dicks, same as always. You seem to have unrealistic expectations about how rigorous their booking policy is.

I agree totally that Mendoza's politics are shit and damaging. This is not, and has never been, a barrier to being booked by QT.
 
I mean, look at this shower - is there anyone on this list who's politics aren't shit and damaging?

Conservative international trade secretary Liam Fox, Labour MP Stella Creasy, editor-in-chief of The Economist Zanny Minton Beddoes, founder and editor of left-wing news site The Canary Kerry-Anne Mendoza, and LBC radio host Nick Ferrari.
 
Back
Top Bottom