They were all on fucking message. everyone was sticking to their script, even if it had been rendered irrelevant by a previous answer.
What did people think of McDonnell? Not sure if his IRA explanation will stick tbh (and the woman saying 'but that just means you'll say anything, you can't be trusted' had a point if it does stick)
I think I've learnt is authenticity rather than what was said that seems to matter more. Got praise from another panellist for first time anyone's apologised..think that's what'll be remembered.
McDonnell and Corbyn are far used to holding impromptu meetings over twenty years, responding to off the cuff questions than those three mantra repeating txt from central office Blairites ..which got them found out in hustings, irrespective of the emptiness of their message.
Apart from coming across as authentic, what also mattered, (as an astute Tory in Telegraph said weeks back and reason I wanted Labour leadership going to JC and JM, is the platform they're now afforded..weekly at PMQs, QT and daily news broadcasts..even not singing a song at least gets that ridiculous dirge of an anthem onto the agenda..not hugely important of course..but some may now question things they wouldn't have previously, if say, a 'moderniser' had won..when none of us would have watched, and no one at work, or on the landings tomorrow, would have asked 'what do you reckon about Kendall thinking the minimum wage should be 20p more then?'
Its not Labourism, but using whatever tactic we have, or in this case given by tradition, to exploit. If our agenda is no longer marginalised, makes everyone's job easier.