Johnny Vodka
The Abominable Scotsman
It's the psychedelic drugs that are to blame.
(((Daily Mail journalists)))Yes. The Mail/MailOnline pays relatively decent rates and pays promptly. Unlike the more left-leaning sections of the press. Not everyone can afford to have principles. Like everyone else, journalists have bills to pay, some have families to support and can't afford to be fussy.
I almost spent my voucher but my wife just walked away in silence when I asked her about this...
Unless they belong to cardinals.Our genitals aren't for looking at!)
This is surely commitment to the cause. We salute youI just checked the grainy long lens pic. he uses his forefinger and middle finger a bit like a “spider” snooker rest to steady the royal member
Maybe Norway, the former colonial power, through canute, might be persuaded to invade and root out the vile Windsor clanWe really do need to cut a swathe through that list until we can achieve a union of crowns with Norway, their sovereign wealth fund is massive having not blown all the oil money like we did. Then we can be the prodigals inheriting the farm and blow it all again.
He didn't say they misinterpreted the number he says the media claimed he boasted about his kills. In the Stephen Colbert show Harry doesn't say the media 'misinterpreted' his text, he claims they wilfully reported the content and context inarticulacy. According to Harry (I didn't read it) he treats the subject in a very different to that which it was reported . . . and he did indeed sign off on it and stand by it.
I'm not a royalist, but I am also not particularly concerned with the plight of Harry and Megan fan one way or the other, but you have clearly reported your experience of the Stephen Colbert show in a very way to the way my eyes and brain 'interpreted' it. . . . . In fact I am not sure how you could have 'misinterpreted that' . . it's there in . . er . . colours and sound. . .
More than anything else it was Colbert himself that made me cringe several times in this interview.
We really do need to cut a swathe through that list until we can achieve a union of crowns with Norway, their sovereign wealth fund is massive having not blown all the oil money like we did. Then we can be the prodigals inheriting the farm and blow it all again.
Questioned by Colbert, the duke defended the disclosure and claimed that it had been distorted by the media without context. “Without doubt, the most dangerous lie that they have told is that I somehow boasted about the number of people that I killed in Afghanistan.”
He continued: “I would say that if I heard anybody else or heard anyone boasting about that kind of thing, I would be angry. But it’s a lie and hopefully now that the book is out, people will be able to see the context. It’s really troubling and very disturbing that they can get away with it because they had the context. It wasn’t like here’s just one line. They had the whole section. They ripped it away and just said, here it is, he’s boasting on this … and that’s dangerous. And my words are not dangerous but the spin of my words are very dangerous.”
About 10 inches in old money.What's the actual size of that? I have to admit I'm tempted.
(I hasten to add I would take it to work, if I bought it. I'd never have it in the house.)
He didn't boast about it.That's the bit
As far as I'm aware, even his former CO said it was a mistake. And he's not a journo.
He didn't boast about it.
The media lied and said he boasted about it.
That's what's pissing him off - and I can understand that.
How much of the boasting passage have you read?I would argue that it was a boast
Could you quote the bit that was a "boast"? I couldn't see one.I would argue that it was a boast but we have our different opinions on that. It's a detail that's not necessary. One of my friends fought in that war for years and though he's told me stories from his time there, some tragic and some actually quite funny, a body count has never been mentioned.
That's exactly the reason I think he was ill advised to put a number on it. They were bound to have a field day from it.He didn't boast about it.
The media lied and said he boasted about it.
That's what's pissing him off - and I can understand that.
they were going to do that whatever he wrote tbfThey were bound to have a field day from it.
You can see why the family motto is (along the lines of) "say nothing, never explain"they were going to do that whatever he wrote tbf
I would argue that it was a boast but we have our different opinions on that. It's a detail that's not necessary. One of my friends fought in that war for years and though he's told me stories from his time there, some tragic and some actually quite funny, a body count has never been mentioned.
It's not 40 minutes it's 10 in that clip and it's fairly near the top. I think he puts his case forward pretty eloquently.I'm not gonna watch 40 minutes of that shite to get to the clip I saw on the news this morning where he, and yes, I was paraphrasing, said the UK media took his claims about killing 25 Taliban 'out of context'. In what context was the media, and not just the UK media, global media supposed to take it?
'So my number is 25. It's not a number that fills me with satisfaction, but nor does it embarrass me.'
It's just a fucking awful thing to say/write and he can't blame the media for piling in on him for it. He's constantly banging on about how much he hates the media and its intrusion into his and Meg's private life and appears to not appreciate the irony of him using the media to broadcast that.
Or maybe she really was trying to get her members an increase in pies..?By coincidence, I heard a Scottish union official interviewed on the radio this morning and the way she was pronouncing the word "pay" sounded to me almost like "pie".
Never noticed that before...
She was from scotland, not lancashireOr maybe she really was trying to get her members an increase in pies..?
Pie in batter, then.She was from scotland, not lancashire
Wtf? So they can lookup "dog bowl" or "frozen penis"?People on twitter are now complaining that THERE IS NO INDEX IN 'SPARE'.