Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Prince Andrew, Duke of York, named in underage 'sex slave' lawsuit

not a trot said:
The house she bought him in Bagshot,is right next door to a Beefeater Inn. Think she was trying to tell him something.
Click to expand...

She didn't buy it for him. Bagshot Park was already in Royal ownership but had been loaned to the Army since WW2. After they pulled-out, it looks like although he started with the house alone on a peppercorn rent, the lease Edward eventually negotiated with the Crown seems to be amongst the most advantageous of any of the junior Royals property/accommodation deals - and he's got it for 150 years, with letting rights on the various estate properties, which could make him and his descendants all the five million-plus he has reputedly spent on the place back and more.
 
Last edited:
Regarding where the dough is coming from; Queenie doesn’t want to be seen to pay a rape victim to stay quiet, so she has paid £2m to Virginia’s charity. The remaining £10m has come from a ‘bridging loan’ from her and Charles.

Will be one of those ‘loans’ that parents give to kids that no one pays any attention to the paying back part. When questions are raised as to the paying back there will be mumblings about the chalet and investments. Btw, every report on the chalet is no profit will be made on it and it was bought via gift of cash from mum and mortgage, plus deferred payment of a lump (court case last year for his honourable welching on that deal).

So in total the Queen and future king have paid a child rape victim to keep shtum.

God Save The Queen!
 
Bahnhof Strasse said:
Regarding where the dough is coming from; Queenie doesn’t want to be seen to pay a rape victim to stay quiet, so she has paid £2m to Virginia’s charity. The remaining £10m has come from a ‘bridging loan’ from her and Charles.

Will be one of those ‘loans’ that parents give to kids that no one pays any attention to the paying back part. When questions are raised as to the paying back there will be mumblings about the chalet and investments. Btw, every report on the chalet is no profit will be made on it and it was bought via gift of cash from mum and mortgage, plus deferred payment of a lump (court case last year for his honourable welching on that deal).

So in total the Queen and future king have paid a child rape victim to keep shtum.

God Save The Queen!
Click to expand...

He's gonna pay that ten million back just as soon as he gets paid for his job as a...national disgrace.
 
I imagine Andy at his Mummys with his servants and teddy bears dreaming of becoming Royal Ambassador For Fallen Women and touring the world again doing sterling work, putting all this behind, indeed finding the positive in it to springboard a new career
 
Bahnhof Strasse said:
Regarding where the dough is coming from; Queenie doesn’t want to be seen to pay a rape victim to stay quiet, so she has paid £2m to Virginia’s charity. The remaining £10m has come from a ‘bridging loan’ from her and Charles.

Will be one of those ‘loans’ that parents give to kids that no one pays any attention to the paying back part. When questions are raised as to the paying back there will be mumblings about the chalet and investments. Btw, every report on the chalet is no profit will be made on it and it was bought via gift of cash from mum and mortgage, plus deferred payment of a lump (court case last year for his honourable welching on that deal).

So in total the Queen and future king have paid a child rape victim to keep shtum.

God Save The Queen!
Click to expand...
There was a piece on the BBC website yesterday looking at this, and they basically came to the conclusion that only genuine source of income he has now is his Royal Navy pension.

However this is dressed up, whatever attempts are made to portray it otherwise, this pay off is coming out of the Royal coffers, which means, essentially, that we the public are paying for it, even if indirectly.
 
andysays said:
There was a piece on the BBC website yesterday looking at this, and they basically came to the conclusion that only genuine source of income he has now is his Royal Navy pension.

However this is dressed up, whatever attempts are made to portray it otherwise, this pay off is coming out of the Royal coffers, which means, essentially, that we the public are paying for it, even if indirectly.
Click to expand...


£20,000 a year. Allsop's clearly been giving him tips on how to stretch it to ski chalets in Verbier and paying off children he raped.
 
andysays said:
There was a piece on the BBC website yesterday looking at this, and they basically came to the conclusion that only genuine source of income he has now is his Royal Navy pension.

However this is dressed up, whatever attempts are made to portray it otherwise, this pay off is coming out of the Royal coffers, which means, essentially, that we the public are paying for it, even if indirectly.
Click to expand...

Pretty sure we pay for Royal Navy pensions, too.
 
Just on the money, but also the previous discussion as to whether they will allow him back to doing duties: I don't think there's a cat in hell's chance he'll be cutting ribbons or saluting army veterans in the future. However I suspect the royal family and wider establishment would think it inconceivable that he could reduced to living off his pension and income from his investments. He's still one of their own and the idea of downward mobility to the point where he ends up living the life of even an affluent middle class worker would be threatening to the idea of who they are. As mentioned above, in practice, the queen will pay the bulk of the settlement and he'll be set up for life, but expected to live a 'quiet' life. However they won't push him to the point where he has no servants. That really would be something they couldn't imagine.
 
I'm wondering how accepted he'll be socially for things like straightforward shooting weekends - I'm sure some of his set will accept him back out of the public's gaze (we've already seen one saying as much).
 
Wilf said:
Just on the money, but also the previous discussion as to whether they will allow him back to doing duties: I don't think there's a cat in hell's chance he'll be cutting ribbons or saluting army veterans in the future. However I suspect the royal family and wider establishment would think it inconceivable that he could reduced to living off his pension and income from his investments. He's still one of their own and the idea of downward mobility to the point where he ends up living the life of even an affluent middle class worker would be threatening to the idea of who they are. As mentioned above, in practice, the queen will pay the bulk of the settlement and he'll be set up for life, but expected to live a 'quiet' life. However they won't push him to the point where he has no servants. That really would be something they couldn't imagine.
Click to expand...

Im hoping that charles totally cunts him off and hes reduced to being technical advisor for the "Budgie the Helicopter" books.
 
two sheds said:
I'm wondering how accepted he'll be socially for things like straightforward shooting weekends - I'm sure some of his set will accept him back out of the public's gaze (we've already seen one saying as much).
Click to expand...
I've wondered about that too. There's probably a sweepstake to be had as to who will give him an invite first. It will either be some rogue millionaire, the the 21st Century version of an impoverished 19th Century aristo being dined by a wealth mill owner. Or perhaps one of the loons who has defended him throughout saying 'he's not been convicted of anything'.
 
I was indeed careful to specify "the guilty ones" - the innocent ones you'd think wouldn't want to touch him with a bargepole.
 
Wilf said:
Just on the money, but also the previous discussion as to whether they will allow him back to doing duties: I don't think there's a cat in hell's chance he'll be cutting ribbons or saluting army veterans in the future. However I suspect the royal family and wider establishment would think it inconceivable that he could reduced to living off his pension and income from his investments. He's still one of their own and the idea of downward mobility to the point where he ends up living the life of even an affluent middle class worker would be threatening to the idea of who they are. As mentioned above, in practice, the queen will pay the bulk of the settlement and he'll be set up for life, but expected to live a 'quiet' life. However they won't push him to the point where he has no servants. That really would be something they couldn't imagine.
Click to expand...


AFAIK he has that Royal Lodge for life at no rent, cos he paid to do it up with his mum's money. And when Brenda carks it there will be a waterfall of cash flowing down to her four kids and her grandkids. Sadly he won't ever need for anything much. Oh and royal wills are secret, not sure but I would imagine that as a result there's no death duties to be paid on all that lucre.
 
Wilf said:
I've wondered about that too. There's probably a sweepstake to be had as to who will give him an invite first. It will either be some rogue millionaire, the the 21st Century version of an impoverished 19th Century aristo being dined by a wealth mill owner. Or perhaps one of the loons who has defended him throughout saying 'he's not been convicted of anything'.
Click to expand...
Just remembered who I had in mind now: Lady Colin Campbell! She was defending him in the press, though she might be too much of a loon for even him to socialise with.
wearechange.org

Royal Family Biographer Defends Prince Andrew: ‘Soliciting Sex From Minors is Not Pedophilia’

Biographer for the Royal Family, Lady Colin Campbell, recently appeared on TV and defended Prince Andrew against claims of pedophilia.
wearechange.org wearechange.org
 
Wilf said:
Just on the money, but also the previous discussion as to whether they will allow him back to doing duties: I don't think there's a cat in hell's chance he'll be cutting ribbons or saluting army veterans in the future. However I suspect the royal family and wider establishment would think it inconceivable that he could reduced to living off his pension and income from his investments. He's still one of their own and the idea of downward mobility to the point where he ends up living the life of even an affluent middle class worker would be threatening to the idea of who they are. As mentioned above, in practice, the queen will pay the bulk of the settlement and he'll be set up for life, but expected to live a 'quiet' life. However they won't push him to the point where he has no servants. That really would be something they couldn't imagine.
Click to expand...
He'll have to start working quietly and humbly on the royal estates, in particular the parts that are cash cows guaranteed to bring in a fortune each year, but badly need the advice of someone who knows sweet FA about farming.

That way, through concentrated hard work, he will doubtless enable the estate to make double, even triple, the profits it has made for the last 100 years, and will receive a few well-earned bonuses at the year end.
 
Last edited:
Bahnhof Strasse said:
AFAIK he has that Royal Lodge for life at no rent, cos he paid to do it up with his mum's money. And when Brenda carks it there will be a waterfall of cash flowing down to her four kids and her grandkids. Sadly he won't ever need for anything much. Oh and royal wills are secret, not sure but I would imagine that as a result there's no death duties to be paid on all that lucre.
Click to expand...
I would not be at all surprised if this money now is considered his inheritance and there's no more.

I also expect his servants will be reduced to the bare minimum (and probably the less competent ones at that) and he will be expected to live a very quiet life under the radar on the Falklands.
 
equationgirl said:
I would not be at all surprised if this money now is considered his inheritance and there's no more.

I also expect his servants will be reduced to the bare minimum (and probably the less competent ones at that) and he will be expected to live a very quiet life under the radar on the Falklands.
Click to expand...
Could you imagine, if you were some royalist flunky and you put in for a job as a butler. At the interview:

'We're pleased to tell you that you've got the job.'
- that's fantastic!
'Do you have any questions?'
- just one, who will I be having the honour of butlering for?
'Ah, erm, well... '
 
Wilf said:
Could you imagine, if you were some royalist flunky and you put in for a job as a butler. At the interview:

'We're pleased to tell you that you've got the job.'
- that's fantastic!
'Do you have any questions?'
- just one, who will I be having the honour of butlering for?
'Ah, erm, well... '
Click to expand...
Exactly.
 
Even though it seems chucky and the bald one have turned against him to defend 'the firm' or whatever they call it, I really can't see that they could envisage a situation where the nonce has to answer his own doorbell or carry his own brew through from the kitchen to the front room. For them, that would be the true cruel and unusual punishment. Mainly, forcing him towards anything like the life that 'commoners' lead would be the inconceivable bit, but there's also some bit in their lizard brains that thinks 'if that could happen to him, it could happen to me'.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Humberto
British Empire and Slave Trade Reparations
2 3 4 5 6
Replies
155
Views
6K
shambler
shambler
tony.c
Major suspect named in Stephen Lawrence murder by BBC
Replies
23
Views
2K
Saul Goodman
Saul Goodman
Elpenor
Prince William’s many good deeds
2 3 4 5 6
Replies
176
Views
10K
Petcha
P
BristolEcho
Modern Slavery at TN Trawlers
Replies
5
Views
594
CNT36
C
friedaweed
Gwynedd council calls for abolition of title Prince of Wales
Replies
2
Views
416
Serene
Serene
Back
Top Bottom