It's a notable observation regardless, but it holds for the weighted base as well.you shouldn't look at the unweighted bases tho.
Polling asking that specific question also shows that - about half as many as are going Tory. Where those voters are is a fairly key question...It's a notable observation regardless, but it holds for the weighted base as well.
It shows that many UKIP voters are going Labour.
Yeah, I feel like the Ancient Mariner, forever compelled to be the voice of doom, but I can't see a way to even a hung parliament. For it to be anything other than a tory majority, several things that don't normally happen have to happen. In a period of mad volatility* in the polls, the fact that there hasn't been a single Labour lead is also telling. It's interesting how Labour's numbers haven't suffered too much after the terrorist outrages, but Labour haven't quite managed to become the vehicle for the resentments that drove Brexit. They've done well and provided the basis for something to be built in the future, but I just have a feeling it will be a 10%, even 12% tory lead on Thursday.I just have a nagging feeling that this is exactly what will go down. Impressive increase in vote share for Labour considering it's only been two years since the last election. But the vast swathes of UKIP voters going Tory will fuck Labour badly & give the Tories a landslide.
recon theres some pickup from an 'anyone but the tories or the SNP' vote seeing tory leaflets etc and grudgingly nose holding?
Possibly. I do think it's actually enthusiasm for Corbyn and his mild renationalisation programme.recon theres some pickup from an 'anyone but the tories or the SNP' vote seeing tory leaflets etc and grudgingly nose holding?
Impressive bar chart.
*Not to scale.Impressive bar chart.
Certainly there are now more UKIP->Labour voters than UKIP->UKIP voters. That is impressive.Yep, Matthew Goodwin's work with ICM polling data has been useful on this and started to show a trend of increasing fall-out to Lab.
View attachment 108613
Impressive bar chart.
It says it's reflecting the mean views of each party's supporters, so presumably there will be some percentages of support around those coloured areas as well.Yeah, I agree with that. But not as polarised as implied by that political compass-style map, with literally nobody other than at the poles. The majority of people in my own personal bubble are still as middle-ground wishy-washy liberal as they ever were.
Yep, sounds good, a way of genuinely making brexit into something useful. On your other point, I think Labour have been hit by the terror stuff, but nobody seems to have got any particular theme running consistently throughout the election - even brexit for the tories, which is what the whole things was supposed to be about.Still think Labour should be pushing a 'Take back control' theme aimed at UKIP demographic - reclaiming our railways and post office. It's a policy with a lot of support. Unfortunately I think a lot of the domestic policy issues have been crowded out by terrorism and security, which I think is to Labour's disadvantage.
Yeah, I feel like the Ancient Mariner, forever compelled to be the voice of doom, but I can't see a way to even a hung parliament. For it to be anything other than a tory majority, several things that don't normally happen have to happen. In a period of mad volatility* in the polls, the fact that there hasn't been a single Labour lead is also telling. It's interesting how Labour's numbers haven't suffered too much after the terrorist outrages, but Labour haven't quite managed to become the vehicle for the resentments that drove Brexit. They've done well and provided the basis for something to be built in the future, but I just have a feeling it will be a 10%, even 12% tory lead on Thursday.
* Well, a kind of volatility. Massive differences between polling companies, but a clear direction of travel towards Labour - but one which seems to have stopped now.
Yeah, true, but I was just getting at the fact that even amidst the very wide variations in the polls Labour has never managed even a 1% lead. As a result, it doesn't bode well for them just losing by say 2% which, at a guess, is the territory they'd have to be in for a Lab + SNP + libscum to be anywhere near the finishing line.Just one point.
Labour don't have to be in the lead for the Tories to lose their majority.
Theoretically, Labour doesn't even need more votes in order to have more seats. In 1951, Churchill won more seats than Labour with fewer votes.Just one point.
Labour don't have to be in the lead for the Tories to lose their majority.
And Feb 74, though the other way round.Theoretically, Labour doesn't even need more votes in order to have more seats. In 1951, Churchill won more seats than Labour with fewer votes.
It's more likely that the Tories would perform this feat. But there are ways it could happen.
there's a big one on thursdayHave we had any polls out with fieldwork entirely after the London Bridge attack?
one thing which is (fairly) certain is that the polls will all differ significantly from the final result. and there will be another inconclusive post mortem.Opiniums final poll has the Tories on a 7 point lead (Labour slipping by 1)
in the same way the tabloids link e.g. arsenal with every player going so they can say, for example, 'as we reported back in july, klinghoffer has signed for arsenal' or similar.I think there's such a spread that one will surely be close...