NoXion
Craicy the Squirrel
Let me repost your own words. Maybe then you'll see how I may have got it 'mixed up'. But I'm still baffled:
Happy to clarify for you.
If I were to say that "my trip to the shops will be accompanied by rain", do you think it would be reasonable to interpret me as meaning that my trip to the shops will "cause" the rain? Or would a more reasonable interpretation be that I saw some dark and heavy clouds on the way? Maybe my understanding of English isn't so great, but the latter is in line with my intended meaning.
what does the bit about increasing the variety of diets got to do with anything here?
People's diets tend to become less diverse as their living standards decrease. Meat tends to be the most expensive part of any meal, even with modern industrial agriculture. So when living standards are attacked because capital would rather make us pay for the majority of the environmental damage which they cause, people will eat less meat. The majority of people won't decide to change their diet because some middle class hippie lectured at them; they'll be forced to change because their bosses tightened their belts for them.
And where do the 'dietary moralists ' come into the wealth equation?
If decreasing living standards are the main reason why "the end of meat is here", then publicly holding up such developments as some kind of triumph would seem to be spectacularly tone-deaf.