Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact
  • Hi Guest,
    We have now moved the boards to the new server hardware.
    Search will be impaired while it re-indexes the posts.
    See the thread in the Feedback forum for updates and feedback.
    Lazy Llama

Official: Prince Philip is Dead, 9th April 2021

Read the article, it explains it.
Such GREAT character


2001: "You're too fat to be an astronaut." To 13-year-old Andrew Adams who told Prince Philip he wanted to go into space.
2002: "Still throwing spears?" Question put to an Australian Aborigine during a visit.

2010: "Do you have a pair of knickers made out of this?" To Scottish Conservative leader Annabel Goldie Pointing while pointing to some tartan in Edinburgh.
2010: "Do you work in a strip club?" To 24-year-old Barnstaple Sea Cadet Elizabeth Rendle when she told him she also worked in a nightclub.
2012: "I would get arrested if I unzipped that dress." To 25-year-old council worker Hannah Jackson, who was wearing a dress with a zip running the length of its front, on a Jubilee visit to Bromley, Kent.
 
Apols if we've already gone over this...but...

April 8 = Fatch death day
April 9 = Racist Prince death day

anything for April 10?
Well we should have people from different walks of life alternate, to keep it varied. Yesterday was a politician, today a Royal. Tomorrow we could have someone from the press, or perhaps the entertainment industry? Katie Hopkins or Laurence Fox would do nicely.
 
Do I believe he had principles, a sense of duty and a strong character? :confused: Yes, of course. I mean you may not agree with the Royal Family as an institution and politically, and I probably don’t either. But I don’t doubt the above, about him personally. To think they are all “evil horrible people” is a laughably simplistic understanding.
Lots of people have those qualities - they are merely decent human traits. I don’t believe he had them anyway
 
Do I believe he had principles, a sense of duty and a strong character? :confused: Yes, of course. I mean you may not agree with the Royal Family as an institution and politically, and I probably don’t either. But I don’t doubt the above, about him personally. To think they are all “evil horrible people” is a laughably simplistic understanding.
Whether he had those qualities or not, the media would be reporting that he had those qualities. About him personally, we can't really know anything. So all we have is his public position.
 
Lots of people have those qualities - they are merely decent human traits. I don’t believe he had them anyway
He was it sounds also incredibly arrogant and rude. A complex character with an extraordinary life that was part of the history of the 20th Century.

I’m not looking forward to the Queen dying, I have great respect for her. And Charles hardly compares.
 
Such GREAT character


2001: "You're too fat to be an astronaut." To 13-year-old Andrew Adams who told Prince Philip he wanted to go into space.
2002: "Still throwing spears?" Question put to an Australian Aborigine during a visit.

2010: "Do you have a pair of knickers made out of this?" To Scottish Conservative leader Annabel Goldie Pointing while pointing to some tartan in Edinburgh.
2010: "Do you work in a strip club?" To 24-year-old Barnstaple Sea Cadet Elizabeth Rendle when she told him she also worked in a nightclub.
2012: "I would get arrested if I unzipped that dress." To 25-year-old council worker Hannah Jackson, who was wearing a dress with a zip running the length of its front, on a Jubilee visit to Bromley, Kent.

Deffo a game in Who said it - Prince Philip, Boris Johnson or Tommy Robinson?
 
Come on. We can have a discussion about whether we believe he had any decent traits or not. I don't really buy the idea that anyone is purely evil, so no doubt we could drag up some evidence of him being nice to a horse or a commoner occasionally. That doesn't mean he's principled or worthy of respect in general. And suggesting that we take articles written within hours of his death, including obituaries ffs, as evidence of good character is laughable. At most, they're going to allude to but skate over the bad bits with a few typical media euphemisms - racist = 'controversial views', sexist = 'of his time' etc. And if, as we've already seen, even the Guardian can barely bring itself to do even that much, there's no hope for anything approaching an honest appraisal.
 
Come on. We can have a discussion about whether we believe he had any decent traits or not. But suggesting that we take articles written within hours of his death, including obituaries ffs, as evidence of good character is laughable. At most, they're going to allude to but skate over the bad bits with a few typical media euphemisms - racist = 'controversial views', sexist = 'of his time' etc. And if, as we've already seen, even the Guardian can barely bring itself to do even that much, there's no hope for anything approaching an honest appraisal.
It won't be had. It'll be "read the article", "the tiny urban bubble (not real world)" or just ignored
 
He was it sounds also incredibly arrogant and rude. A complex character with an extraordinary life that was part of the history of the 20th Century.

I’m not looking forward to the Queen dying, I have great respect for her. And Charles hardly compares.

Are you 100% positive these are your own original thoughts?
 
Come on. We can have a discussion about whether we believe he had any decent traits or not. But suggesting that we take articles written within hours of his death, including obituaries ffs, as evidence of good character is laughable. At most, they're going to allude to but skate over the bad bits with a few typical media euphemisms - racist = 'controversial views', sexist = 'of his time' etc. And if, as we've already seen, even the Guardian can barely bring itself to do even that much, there's no hope for anything approaching an honest appraisal.

They would have been written months, if not years ago, and just kept on file ready to unleash.
 
They would have been written months, if not years ago, and just kept on file ready to unleash.

Well, ok - but the point is that they're written for consumption in the immediate aftermath. They will aim for nothing more than toadying, and even the tiny vanilla hints at someone not being 100% good in those circumstances are only really there to create a bit of 'complex, interesting man' bollocks.
 
Back
Top Bottom