Cid
Proper break this time
Read the above obituary if you want to understand
Born in turbulent times, married a queen, hung around in palaces not doing very much. Not quite sure why they used so many words for that.
Read the above obituary if you want to understand
Such GREAT characterRead the article, it explains it.
I did. More nauseatingly obsequious guffRead the above obituary if you want to understand
Well we should have people from different walks of life alternate, to keep it varied. Yesterday was a politician, today a Royal. Tomorrow we could have someone from the press, or perhaps the entertainment industry? Katie Hopkins or Laurence Fox would do nicely.Apols if we've already gone over this...but...
April 8 = Fatch death day
April 9 = Racist Prince death day
anything for April 10?
Lots of people have those qualities - they are merely decent human traits. I don’t believe he had them anywayDo I believe he had principles, a sense of duty and a strong character? Yes, of course. I mean you may not agree with the Royal Family as an institution and politically, and I probably don’t either. But I don’t doubt the above, about him personally. To think they are all “evil horrible people” is a laughably simplistic understanding.
Apols if we've already gone over this...but...
April 8 = Fatch death day
April 9 = Racist Prince death day
anything for April 10?
Whether he had those qualities or not, the media would be reporting that he had those qualities. About him personally, we can't really know anything. So all we have is his public position.Do I believe he had principles, a sense of duty and a strong character? Yes, of course. I mean you may not agree with the Royal Family as an institution and politically, and I probably don’t either. But I don’t doubt the above, about him personally. To think they are all “evil horrible people” is a laughably simplistic understanding.
He was it sounds also incredibly arrogant and rude. A complex character with an extraordinary life that was part of the history of the 20th Century.Lots of people have those qualities - they are merely decent human traits. I don’t believe he had them anyway
Sure.Whether he had those qualities or not, the media would be reporting that he had those qualities. About him personally, we can't really know anything. So all we have is his public position.
Such GREAT character
Prince Philip's gaffes from decades on royal duty
After the Duke of Edinburgh steps down from duties, we take a look back at some of the infamous remarks he has made while in the public eye.www.bbc.co.uk
2001: "You're too fat to be an astronaut." To 13-year-old Andrew Adams who told Prince Philip he wanted to go into space.
2002: "Still throwing spears?" Question put to an Australian Aborigine during a visit.
2010: "Do you have a pair of knickers made out of this?" To Scottish Conservative leader Annabel Goldie Pointing while pointing to some tartan in Edinburgh.
2010: "Do you work in a strip club?" To 24-year-old Barnstaple Sea Cadet Elizabeth Rendle when she told him she also worked in a nightclub.
2012: "I would get arrested if I unzipped that dress." To 25-year-old council worker Hannah Jackson, who was wearing a dress with a zip running the length of its front, on a Jubilee visit to Bromley, Kent.
Born in turbulent times, married a queen, hung around in palaces not doing very much. Not quite sure why they used so many words for that.
Yep. Be scouring very carefully for anything interesting...Deluge of bad news burying follows - this'll keep 'em going for weeks...
WTAF; Urban?I’m not looking forward to the Queen dying, I have great respect for her.
Born in turbulent times, married a queen, hung around in palaces not doing very much. Not quite sure why they used so many words for that.
It won't be had. It'll be "read the article", "the tiny urban bubble (not real world)" or just ignoredCome on. We can have a discussion about whether we believe he had any decent traits or not. But suggesting that we take articles written within hours of his death, including obituaries ffs, as evidence of good character is laughable. At most, they're going to allude to but skate over the bad bits with a few typical media euphemisms - racist = 'controversial views', sexist = 'of his time' etc. And if, as we've already seen, even the Guardian can barely bring itself to do even that much, there's no hope for anything approaching an honest appraisal.
He was it sounds also incredibly arrogant and rude. A complex character with an extraordinary life that was part of the history of the 20th Century.
I’m not looking forward to the Queen dying, I have great respect for her. And Charles hardly compares.
Come on. We can have a discussion about whether we believe he had any decent traits or not. But suggesting that we take articles written within hours of his death, including obituaries ffs, as evidence of good character is laughable. At most, they're going to allude to but skate over the bad bits with a few typical media euphemisms - racist = 'controversial views', sexist = 'of his time' etc. And if, as we've already seen, even the Guardian can barely bring itself to do even that much, there's no hope for anything approaching an honest appraisal.
It won't be had. It'll be "read the article", "the tiny urban bubble (not real world)" or just ignored
Me. Although I'm...well, see my previous posts.Who on Earth watches rolling tv news in the middle of the day. Haven’t you got anything better to do?
He was it sounds also incredibly arrogant and rude. A complex character with an extraordinary life that was part of the history of the 20th Century.
Searching for earth sleeving now.
I’ve not met him and formed my own opinion if that’s what you mean I live in LeedsAre you 100% positive these are your own original thoughts?
They would have been written months, if not years ago, and just kept on file ready to unleash.
They would have been written months, if not years ago, and just kept on file ready to unleash.
Scratch a liberal...