Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Missing Milly Dowler's voicemail "hacked by News of the World"

probably . Though there's already a Sunday Sun in Newcastle so that could rule out one possibility

The Morning Star tried to stop the Daily Star calling itself that, when it first appeared. The judge in the case through the Stalinists' claim out, saying that 'only a moron in a hurry would be unable to tell the difference'.

And do you know where that moron ended up?
 
and they will announce the launch with a brand new Sunday newspaper with exactly the same staff and editor and exactly the same content

Depends. Depends how much money they've lost and how much credibility they've lost. A new Sunday paper from Murdoch? Get tweeting, folks - advertisers beware!
 
Tesco cunts:
4.30pm: I just spoke to Tesco and they said they would not be expanding on their earlier statements confirming they would keep advertising with the News of the World, but if the NoW is dropping all advertising this Sunday that may get the supermarket chain off the hook.
 
Our old pal Brian Paddick has told the Daily Mail (the same paper that fucked his career!!) that bribes were paid in cash to top cops.

Rebekah Brooks head on a spike imminent. About fucking time. Enjoy jail!!

jail only happens to those who PISS OFF News International, i think you have not grasped British Justice!
 
It just occurred to me (as it has no doubt done to many others already - I'm slow, ok?) that there seems to be a distinction between people who's phone it is ok to hack (all the celebs and famous people already named) and those it's not ('innocent' victims/members of the public). You'd like to think it'd be a black and white "you can't go snooping on people's private phonecalls", but apparently not.
 
I think dropping a title which has been around for many years and has a big readership just to save a couple of execs is just another example of how badly this whole affair has been managed by news international. Its been a fucking shambles.
 
They risk spreading the boycott to the daily edition of the Sun now :D

That, and the obvious cheek of the thing, is why I dont think there will be an immediate replacement. It does sort of lead on to what on earth they are going to do with all the hacks though - you would think there would be a strong incentive in ditching most of them as well. (edit - and noone is reporting the replacement paper yet either).
 
An Email Regarding Butlins NOTW Advertising & Banning Vulnerable Adults

Sent To
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

Copied To
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

To whom it may concern,

I was disappointed at the length of time Butlins took to take the small step of pulling advertising from 'this weekend's News of the World paper. Despite billing yourself as a family company Butlins this is a poor reflection on how you view people.

Now in the same week I read from several sources that a group of people with learning disabilities have been turned away from your Skegness holiday site as they are intimidating. Since December 2006, there has been a legal duty on all public sector organisations to promote equality of opportunity for disabled people.

I will boycott your business with immediate effect. l also make all family, friends and business associates aware of your actions as well as your total lack of respect for people.
 
So - no more News of the World!

GOTCHA!!

Wheres the info about a new Sun on Sunday coming from?

Cant see owt on bbc or gruniad.
 
It just occurred to me (as it has no doubt done to many others already - I'm slow, ok?) that there seems to be a distinction between people who's phone it is ok to hack (all the celebs and famous people already named) and those it's not ('innocent' victims/members of the public). You'd like to think it'd be a black and white "you can't go snooping on people's private phonecalls", but apparently not.

Theres a whole thread about it. I think whilst it was who said what to who and who shagged who gossip, then a lot of people werent that bothered. The deleting of messages on a missing child's phone was the turning point. There are some lines that should not be crossed, it would seem.
 
Back
Top Bottom