not according to the Times, which made a big thing today of a G apology for a story claiming that the Sun had doorstepped one the Leveson lawyers. Much high horsery about how the apology should have been on the front page and general finger pointing about shoddy journalism.The guardians coming out of this looking like a saint.
Ooh, blimey - have to admit that I've haven't heard about this angle on the whole thing before (and tbh, I haven't been looking so much at this thread, lately): http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/nov/28/peter-hain-computer-private-investigators
What would be the News Of The World's "agenda" be in getting hold of sensitive Northern Ireland info, I wonder? Speculation: making out Labour to be "pro-IRA"? Potential de-facto blackmail against Hain and Co? Ensuring that any hacked info would "accidentally" fall into the hands of the more "respectable" Times?
Next up is McMullan though, should be entertaining...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leveson_Inquiry#Scope_and_processI'm sort of wondering what the point of the Leveson enquiry is, apart from trying to postpone any action and defuse the situation so that the journos don't get sent down. Why not just have criminal investigations and trials? It sounds like plenty of existing laws have been broken.
I <3 paul mcmullen.Straight off with the lulz: "Funnily enough I was a trainee with Michael Gove. I was top of my class. He was down near the bottom."
And then making good use of the platform to have a moan about his local fire safety officer not allowing him to let out the rooms on the top floor of his pub. "Let's stick to your journalistic experience, please, Mr McMullen..." "No, no, this is important!"
do you really think that?He seems to have no concept of exactly how dreadful he sounds.
do you really think that?
is this going to be on watch again, or will i have to make do with whatever edited highlights the news gives us tonight?