There is already one US lawsuit related to the current scandal. News Corporation is being sued by a group of shareholders who allege a failure of corporate governance.
The lawsuit was filed in Delaware by Amalgamated Bank and a group of pension funds, and is an updated version of a previous action.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-14111966
Wonder what the previous action was about?
Wonder what the previous action was about?
Peston drives me up the fucking wall the way he talks and drawls his words.
One marvels how these people could have got mixed up with Editorial Intelligence in the first place. How could the cause of good journalism possibly be strengthened by a PR operation whose main purpose is to help companies manipulate the media? Mr D'Ancona is quoted as saying that Editorial Intelligence had become too much of a "distraction". The truth is that he and others have belatedly woken up to the fact that they had no business helping a PR organisation.
Which suggests that he's quite prepared to do stuff that he shouldn't and has a track record for it - esp where PR and journalism 'meet' Summed up nicely in the article that you didn't read:
Peston drives me up the fucking wall the way he talks and drawls his words.
All I saw was he was involved at the staet and got out when it turned out to be something other?
Are you trying to recreate a Murdoch style smear?
And once again, questions are emerging over quite who is providing the enthusiastic journalist with the 'inside track' that has placed him at the vanguard of the story.
Media commentators have highlighted the close personal and formerly professional relationship between Mr Peston and Will Lewis, the very senior News International troubleshooter, amid suggestions that the BBC man is being used by the Murdoch machine.
There are certainly links between Mr Peston, the son of Labour peer and economist Maurice Peston, and Mr Lewis.
It seems that the person Wade (as was) went to in 2009 to shockingly reveal that naughty Glenn Mulcaire had tapped her phone was...Robert Peston - at that time BBC Business Editor.That ceratinly suggests he's at least close to the inside of the NI network.
Or she was keen to ingratiate herself, or to try and drab him in, or to build relations with the BBC, or a hundred other possibilities. Well done.
Best-case scenario: Rupert, James and Rebekah facing criminal charges in the UK and US, ruled not 'fit and proper' to own a single share of BSkyB, News Corp effectively dismantled, and the phone-hacking rot spreading to the Daily Mail and Dacre. Oh, that would be beautiful.
Are the telephone companies escaping from this unscathed?
I answered a direct question from BA. Why are you now pretending you understand the answer when you clearly don't?Peston is a NI "mouthpiece" because he was fed a story about NI buying from a police officer personal and security details about the head of state?
tfb to him, he doesn't just hang out with *a* group. He works the Murdoch group, and the Bank of England people, and the former master of the universe, etc, etc. It is, after all, his job as Business Editor.I think all we know about Peston is that:
- he hung out at Brooks's;
- the Met provided information to News International in confidence, possibly including cop-bribing;
- IIRC Peston broke the story about payola for Royal Protection cops; and
- I speculate - and I think I'm right - that this changing of the subject from bent Murdoch to bent cops is what the Met is so upset about (here).
So - is he a shill, or was he used, by feeding him a juicy story?
That's the worst case scenario now, surely.
Best case is the coalition crumbling along with everything New Labour stood for, the complete collapse of the Met, CPS and large parts of the judiciary, along with the pro-austerity, pro-banker media in this country, and a series of governments brought to their knees in short order whilst we, 'the people'. have a proper think about what democracy really means and how we want to implement it.
That is an absolute best case scenario, obv.
If someone has evidence to the contrary - 'evidence' not being a Daily Mail article - then I'm all ears.