They just read your post & reacted to it. Were you misrepresented or were you not clear about what you meant? Adolescent bullshit = you disingenuous bullshitter.
nah you did up there somewhere ^ahhhhh fuckin hell you opened that can of worms
No one here would know who Laurie Pennie is? C'mon.
He said 'heard of'. And Urban and Laurie have some history.
Cool story bro.
Kabbes said no one he knows would know who Laurie Pennie is. Kabbes is a long time poster and knows a lot of people on urban. Urban had a thread which Pennie posted on which went on for ages and got everyone excited. Maybe he didn't read it (benefit of doubt). I'm not having a go at Kabbes by the way.
Famous journalist who had a ding dong with Urban.
Alright, Mr Pedant. Nobody I know *outside urban*. I rather think that was implied, as everybody other than you seemed to understand.
Sorry. I'm being silly. That's the problem with not knowing anyone in real life. I've been here for ages but i've only met JC3 in the real world and i've put him on ignore for constantly oppositional behaviour this week.
You seem to have an issue with people who stack shelves for a living. Care to explain why?
Did you read what that quote of yours was responding to? Here it is with the offending bit highlighted for you:
I have been through this already... In fact, in the very bit you quoted ffs. You seem to be looking to pick a fight with me; care to explain why?
Your post says
Given the context this implies to me that he deserves better than that. That somehow stacking shelves would be beneath him. I didn't get quite the same level of contempt for people who stack shelves from pengaleng's post.
Either you're deliberately misreading what I posted in the lead-up to this or you're spoiling for an argument for some reason. Which is it?
^This emanymton for fuck's sake, this. I'm not quoting it all over again so you can misread it or attribute some kind of sneery snobbery to me, fuck that. If you still have a problem, take it to PM's.
You referred to Milo getting a regular job. When the example of stacking shelves was given it clearly annoyed you. The only reason I can see for your annoyance is that by regular job you meant a 'proper' regular job not something as 'bad' as stacking shelves.
Yeah looking back on it, I can see where that may have come across but that was not my intention. My annoyance was at the tone of the response and putting a slant on my words that wasn't there when I wrote it. I meant 'regular, low-key' in the context of not being in the public eye and getting well-remunerated for being an offensive gobshite. I did not imply or infer any specific choice of job and that's what I took offense at; having words put in my mouth, not the 'status' of the job itself iyswim..
Thank you. I suggest we chalk this one up as a miscommunication.
Agreed
No worries, have been cranky meself the past couple of days...
