DrRingDing
'anti-human wanker'
So when's the demo in Tottenham then?
Don't have a go at the auntie, though, mate.Auntie now playing ball and calling for calm
Exactly.I think if they'd planned to murder him they'd have come up with a better plan to cover it up. Not that they'd need to of course, when they can get away with a story as patchy as this one.
What motive would there have been for a pre-planned extra-judicial hit? Are there any other examples of such hits by the Met (i.e. not Northern Ireland, and not alleged politics/secret state killings on the mainland)? I don't buy it. Far more likely to me that this was a monumental f***-up (see also de Menezes).Not trying to be funny here, but why is that the most likely explanation? I see no evidence to back it up - discounting everything said by the police as worthless, all kinds of scenarios are possible, including that they set out that night to murder Mark Duggan in cold blood.
I think if they'd planned to murder him they'd have come up with a better plan to cover it up. Not that they'd need to of course, when they can get away with a story as patchy as this one.
i am not at all! and never would, utmost respect for her and the rest of the familyDon't have a go at the auntie, though, mate.
Or maybe just maybe she does not want her neighbourhood wrecked by a riot.i am not at all! and never would, utmost respect for her and the rest of the family
meant that she is playing ball after loads of hassle and people leaning on her most likely
Well, let's stick to what we can say with confidence:What motive would there have been for a pre-planned extra-judicial hit? Are there any other examples of such hits by the Met (i.e. not Northern Ireland, and not alleged politics/secret state killings on the mainland)? I don't buy it. Far more likely to me that this was a monumental f***-up (see also de Menezes).
“McGuinness had told his debriefers in May 1998 that there were bags of imitation guns, wigs and balaclavas that the Flying Squad took out on operations to plant on suspects. They were used “in case an armed officer shot a robber and he wasn’t carrying a firearm” or to increase the chances of a prosecution. Everyone, he said, referred to it as a “first aid kit”. The point he made, as if this mitigated anything, was that only the guilty career criminal was fitted up this way.”
Excerpt From: Flynn, Laurie. “Untouchables (Bloomsbury Reader).” iBooks. https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewBook?id=624535B499B08DA7649E7EFBFB4D7A69
2 pm Saturday.So when's the demo in Tottenham then?
Auntie now playing ball and calling for calm
2 pm Saturday.
right sorry everyone!now playing ball....suggests that she at some point did not wantor was not calling for calm
I don't think there had to be a plan as such. The culture of impunity is so deeply ingrained that there's virtually no inhibition. The likelihood of it coming to trial is fairly remote and if there is a trial, the likelihood of a conviction is vanishingly small given all the biases involved. In fact, given the history of these trials the chance is precisely zero. So they don't have to go out with the intention of murder. They can go out in the knowledge that there is no chance of them being called to account if their target does get killed. And given a particular mindset, that amounts to the same thing.What motive would there have been for a pre-planned extra-judicial hit? Are there any other examples of such hits by the Met (i.e. not Northern Ireland, and not alleged politics/secret state killings on the mainland)? I don't buy it. Far more likely to me that this was a monumental f***-up (see also de Menezes).
bottom of this report and saw it in a couple of places last nightGot a link?
I don't think there had to be a plan as such. The culture of impunity is so deeply ingrained that there's virtually no inhibition. The likelihood of it coming to trial is fairly remote and if there is a trial, the likelihood of a conviction is vanishingly small given all the biases involved. In fact, given the history of these trials the chance is precisely zero. So they don't have to go out with the intention of murder. They can go out in the knowledge that there is no chance of them being called to account if their target does get killed. And given a particular mindset, that amounts to the same thing.
bottom of this report and saw it in a couple of places last night
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...n-was-lawfully-killed-jury-finds-9046813.html
hope the cop shop is surrounded
I can think of four police killings off the top of my head where the decision was questionable at best.Gun police claim to have opened fire only six times in the past four years.
I can think of four police killings off the top of my head where the decision was questionable at best.
The barrister guy, the table leg guy, de Menezes and Duggan.The barrister guy?
right sorry everyone!
people on twitter etc were saying last night that she should have called for calm etc and that now this would be used as an excuse for "them to get new trainers" and those who "didn't get a 50" TV for xmas can get one now" etc etc
also the authorities (and others) would obviously prefer and want her/the family to call for calm as it makes their job easier
i am in no way suggesting that she did not want calm and that last night they were in severe shock and pain so it would have been unfair to expect some kind of calm and all encompassing statement from the family
is that ok?
mark saundersThe barrister guy?
The barrister guy, the table leg guy, de Menezes and Duggan.
and diarmuid o'neillThe barrister guy, the table leg guy, de Menezes and Duggan.
more than that if you include diarmuid o'neill.Agreed. All extremely questionable. 12-year period.
and diarmuid o'neill