Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Many dead in coordinated Paris shootings and explosions

Status
Not open for further replies.
Also on the flag subject, IME within France the flag can often be used to show solidarity amongst compatriots regardless of whether they're Muslim, black, immigrants, whatever, under the spirit of what the nation stands for in some people's views. We saw that after Charlie Hebdo. Not exclusive amongst countries either.

It doesn't feel like the English or British flag is often used the same way, far more often about a selective (i.e. racist) nationalist idea. Of course the French one gets used in the same way too, just look at the FN etc - just that it can be both.

So if you're projecting Anglo-centric ideas about nationhood and emblems, it might not always work. Just my experience, not particularly well versed in this by any means.
 
All this intellectual stuff about French flag profile pics - at least the second strand of the thread where we've allowed it to become all about one poster - overlooks the fact that you only have to press a button, right there for all, in order to have FB apply it for you.

On an FB note I woke up this morning to the FB notification that various friends of mine - I used to live in Paris - had been declared safe. Weird but I'm not going to criticise the mechanism as someone did above.
Facebook has a 'thing' they turn on when something hideous happens so you can mark yourself safe. They did it during Nepal earthquake. I have a link hang on.

Edit: #Paris: The power, the horror, and the distortions - BBC News


Fuck, now a TGV has derailed near Strasbourg :(
 
Last edited:
Facebook has a 'thing' they turn on when something hideous happens so you can mark yourself safe. They did it during Nepal earthquake. I have a link hang on.
Yep, heard of it, just never seen it before. I have no issue with it - I know some don't like it but I think it's a good way of quickly & passively flagging yourself/others and stopping people worrying, without having to go down a repetitive, self-indulgent route of 'hi guys, I'm fine'.
 
Also on the flag subject, IME within France the flag can often be used to show solidarity amongst compatriots regardless of whether they're Muslim, black, immigrants, whatever, under the spirit of what the nation stands for in some people's views. We saw that after Charlie Hebdo. Not exclusive amongst countries either.

It doesn't feel like the English or British flag is often used the same way, far more often about a selective (i.e. racist) nationalist idea. Of course the French one gets used in the same way too, just look at the FN etc - just that it can be both.

So if you're projecting Anglo-centric ideas about nationhood and emblems, it might not always work. Just my experience, not particularly well versed in this by any means.
Yep, meanings of flags are varied and contested.

Also, it is relevant, I think, in terms of how we think about different attacks, to consider the motivation of the attackers. Their motivation seems very clear - this wasn't an attack just on Paris or France, but on Europe as a whole. So the target is 'us' if we live here in Europe. Declaring solidarity the day after an attack with a group that was attacked because they are like us is hardly evil or reactionary, and certainly not necessarily racist.
 
Yep, heard of it, just never seen it before. I have no issue with it - I know some don't like it but I think it's a good way of quickly & passively flagging yourself/others and stopping people worrying, without having to go down a repetitive, self-indulgent route of 'hi guys, I'm fine'.
Yeah, and people do have irrational fears sometimes. We all do. If there's an attack like this in London, my mum will phone me up to see if I'm ok. I remember phoning my sister after the King's Cross fire to make sure she was alright.
 
Yep, meanings of flags are varied and contested.

Also, it is relevant, I think, in terms of how we think about different attacks, to consider the motivation of the attackers. Their motivation seems very clear - this wasn't an attack just on Paris or France, but on Europe as a whole. So the target is 'us' if we live here in Europe. Declaring solidarity the day after an attack with a group that was attacked because they are like us is hardly evil or reactionary, and certainly not necessarily racist.
who is this "us" who does it include and exclude?
 
All this intellectual stuff about French flag profile pics - at least the second strand of the thread where we've allowed it to become all about one poster - overlooks the fact that you only have to press a button, right there for all, in order to have FB apply it for you.

On an FB note I woke up this morning to the FB notification that various friends of mine - I used to live in Paris - had been declared safe. Weird but I'm not going to criticise the mechanism as someone did above.
I remember being worried about people after previous bomb attacks, but you don't ring cos they'd either have serious shit to deal with or your needlessly tieing up the phone network at a critical time. A Facebook 'I'm ok' is a sensible step forward
 
Yeah, and people do have irrational fears sometimes. We all do. If there's an attack like this in London, my mum will phone me up to see if I'm ok. I remember phoning my sister after the King's Cross fire to make sure she was alright.

My mum is going to france in two weeks, i rang her up this afternoon and told her to be careful :facepalm:
 
Yep, meanings of flags are varied and contested.

Also, it is relevant, I think, in terms of how we think about different attacks, to consider the motivation of the attackers. Their motivation seems very clear - this wasn't an attack just on Paris or France, but on Europe as a whole. So the target is 'us' if we live here in Europe. Declaring solidarity the day after an attack with a group that was attacked because they are like us is hardly evil or reactionary, and certainly not necessarily racist.
I say this with my clueless tourist's rose tinted glasses on, but it also comes down to national identity and engagement in nationhood, which is drastically different between Britain and France.

British - at least, English - nationhood and the state is to me a mostly vague set of behaviours or characteristics, and a few commonalities, but not a lot more, in part due to the laissez-faire attitude to multiculturalism and life in general. If you did engage heavily in national identity it'd be a bit weird.

It feels like in France the state and national unity has a much stronger presence, is more coherent and easier as an idea to engage with. Not least because it's protectionist and doggedly secular, it is an actual, tangible, meaningful thing that impacts your life - to be French or part of France has definition beyond a place on a passport or a one off citizenship test. So again the idea of nationalism, if that loaded term is even the right word for what I'm getting at, is something not so easily interchanged back and forth over the Channel.

I envy it in some ways actually, although it's not my most well-formed of opinions.
 
Concerning an arrest made at Gatwick earlier:
Police were called at around 9.30am following suspicious actions by a man who discarded an item in a bin at the airport. Explosive Ordnance Disposal specialists were called to the airport to investigate the item and carried out a small controlled explosion.

Personal items and what appears to be a firearm were recovered and have been removed for forensic examination. However, the viability of the weapon has yet to be established.

A 41-year-old man from Vendôme in France was arrested at the scene at the time of the report on suspicion of firearms offences. He was 'landside' at the airport and had not checked in or passed through any passport or security checks.
Source: Sussex Police
 
Yep, meanings of flags are varied and contested.

Also, it is relevant, I think, in terms of how we think about different attacks, to consider the motivation of the attackers. Their motivation seems very clear - this wasn't an attack just on Paris or France, but on Europe as a whole. So the target is 'us' if we live here in Europe. Declaring solidarity the day after an attack with a group that was attacked because they are like us is hardly evil or reactionary, and certainly not necessarily racist.
simplistic rubbish. the attack clearly not on europe as a whole - doubt turks this side of istanbul feel it an attack on them, for instance. it is an attack not on europe as a whole but on parts of europe: and aimed to divide, not unite. it is a goad, to drive governments towards some policy options, and to push people away from their usual inclinations.
 
Here's a long thing by an ISIS propaganda writer explaining how an important part of their work is to 'eliminate the grey zone' , make sure everyone is forced to pick a side.

eg)"And thus, the time had come for another event – magnified by the presence of the Khilāfah on the global stage – to further bring division to the world and destroy the grayzone everywhere."
&
"Muslims in the crusader countries will find themselves driven to abandon their homes for a place to live in the Khilāfah, as the crusaders increase persecution against Muslims living in Western lands"

THE EXTINCTION OF THE GRAYZONE « ansarukhilafah
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom