spitfire
Walty McWaltface
With a name like spitfire I expect no less.
Weak. You're clearly not worth spending any more time on.
With a name like spitfire I expect no less.
i think having an ak and being disciplined enough to calmly gun down scores of people, that doesn't come from nowhere and is a cut above the 7/7 bombers. likely to have been well known and at some point actively monitored.surely the intelligence arm operate on the 'know them, watch them' thing on the idea that
1) they've done nothing yet and may lead you to bigger fish
2)if you nab the ones you know before something happens its internment (always a winner eh) and they'll be replaced by people you don't know
thats why I recon they are always known. Another did just occur to me- arse covering. 'We knew of him but we didn't know he planned this' presumably sounds a lot better than 'we didn't have a scooby.
Ha someone just put that peace symbol with the tricalore transparently on top. I think there's a limit! I was tempted to say 'Could you work a bloke in a stripy shirt with onions round his neck in there too?'
with a name like his i would expect nothing stronger.Weak. You're clearly not worth spending any more time on.
For sure they will.Cameron talking, "continue to provide our intelligence agencies all the resources they need" ..
Assuming we, the public, are told the truth of course?.. It's going to be instructive to see exactly how this plot was planned - sophisticated, encrypted electronic comms or something more mundane - and how the state works from that for a request for greater powers.
For sure they will.
It's going to be instructive to see exactly how this plot was planned - sophisticated, encrypted electronic comms or something more mundane - and how the state works from that for a request for greater powers.
My Moroccan friend has posted enthusiastically about Allah, yet also changed her avatar to a tricolor. What should I tell her she is DrRingDing ? We can't call her white but she must be guilty of something.
while i sympathise with your pov i don't think now the time to be talking about getting rid of young and his ilk.Tony Young is letting us know that he is reading this Eurabia conspiracist creed on twitter, he thinks it is pertinent to current events. He and his ilk are crying out for pogroms.
no one is innocentWe are all guilty of something.
As far back as the IRA, indeed, no doubt before them, the way of transmitting ultra-sensitive information was face to face.
I am no technical wizard, but even I can think of many ways to circumvent government electronic data gathering. It is possible to transmit information within a jpeg, so put up 50 photos in a Photobucket, or any other free picture site, one of which contains the message. Old technology such as a microdot under a postage stamp on an envelope still works. Once you move away from direct electronic communication, detection becomes much more difficult.
Tony Young is letting us know that he is reading this Eurabia conspiracist creed on twitter, he thinks it is pertinent to current events. He and his ilk are crying out for pogroms.
and theres always one time pad encryption. I don't think they've built a computer that can crack that yet.Once you move away from direct electronic communication, detection becomes much more difficult.
One thing I learned from watching a programme about foling plots was that even if you type on a Word doc and then delete the text without saving, they can still find out what you typed. At least that's what I understood. Is that right? If so, it would make you lean towards old-fashioned techniques.
have you seen the very interedting book "decoding the ira"?As far back as the IRA, indeed, no doubt before them, the way of transmitting ultra-sensitive information was face to face.
I am no technical wizard, but even I can think of many ways to circumvent government electronic data gathering. It is possible to transmit information within a jpeg, so put up 50 photos in a Photobucket, or any other free picture site, one of which contains the message. Old technology such as a microdot under a postage stamp on an envelope still works. Once you move away from direct electronic communication, detection becomes much more difficult.
and theres always one time pad encryption. I don't think they've built a computer that can crack that yet.
Amazingly, that was probably the second least offensive thing he posted / retweeted recently.
Properly used, a one time pad encryption is literally unbreakable. Properly used, though.
and theres always one time pad encryption. I don't think they've built a computer that can crack that yet.
The US caught a Cuban spy because they used the same code twice, which obviously defeats the whole point of them.
have you seen the very interedting book "decoding the ira"?
Keith Hart just posted this on FB
I was reminded how safe we are in this apartment. I retweeted a clip from the stadium and people thought I was there. I can't bear this latest fad to declare yourself safe in a Nepal earthquake. It's an extension of the daily TV news: disasters in three places -- thank god it wasn't me. Now amplified by projecting personal insecurity onto people you know where the disasters happen. Maybe it's human compassion, a sentiment not to be underrated. But I fear that this sentimentality will be exploited by the powers to escalate their controls over society, not least against the North Africans.
it's about the ira use of code and communications subterfuges in the 1920s and 30sI haven't. What's the gist?
or at least those of the people who agree with us are purer and simpler.I think he answers his own question here. It is human compassion. And yes, of course there is the fear that this will be used to ratchet up the fear and division. Yes, the fight continues against the actions of the US and French and British and other governments. But it is possible to do both - to express solidarity with those in Paris and with those in Syria, Iraq, etc. Doing one doesn't mean you don't do the other.
Even the use of the French flag today is not some sign of European or white supremacism. Generally, the motivation will be way simpler than that - just a sign of solidarity, using a symbol that is to hand, but not an exclusive one, not 'we show solidarity with the French and not North Africans or Syrians or Iraqis'. Not necessarily. Some politicians may do that. But most people are not politicians. Their motivations are simpler and better.