Don't care if he was the nicest guy on the planet or not. He won pretty much everything, everywhere. Do you think he was quite a good footballer?
Sorry what. You don’t mind a rapist if he was a good footballer?
That's a good point, sure, forgot about that. But my point is Kompany was a fucking idiot to suggest that he was a lazy player. He's renowned as the hardest training player in any squad. He has no life. Just training.
I don’t care for Kompany, who is happy to sing songs referncing Hillsborough.
But I don’t think many people feel Ronaldo has the legs anymore for 90 mins pressing. He just isn’t that type of player.
Not Gary Neville. Not Goldbridge. Not many people. He has reached the point where he is a problem more than a solution.
I totally agree. He should have retired after Juve.
He should play for Sporting but lots of footballers do this weird thing where they want so much money they restrict their options so much. He doesn’t need it. Be interesting to see if he sees some sense and makes a decision just on football.
Better cunts are no doubt circling.Breaking news: United is for sale!
Not a United fan but happy for you guys to get rid of those cunts
That's just it, there is an argument because there are two of them who have put up almost identical career stats and each has a claim to both the "greatest of the modern game" and the less-quantifiable "greatest of all time" labels.Padding stats..lol. The guy has ruined his legacy which is a shame but you can not argue with his career. Dominated the game in two positions. The greatest of the modern game, no argument.
Ronaldo moved around and won wherever he went, was successful, and adapted his game. Messi didn't.
This is a touch disingenuous. Messi only won things because Barcelona were good anyway, as opposed to such plucky underdogs as Ferguson-era Man Utd, Real Madrid and Juventus. Messi is also still very, very good for PSG.Yep. Messi's good. But one club (where he was successful anyway) and then a total flop when he was forced to spread his wings. And at least Ronaldo isn't an 'Ambassador (wtf does that even mean) for a fascist evil regime.
I think Ronaldo's only missing the Bundesliga from his conquests.
This is a touch disingenuous. Messi only won things because Barcelona were good anyway, as opposed to such plucky underdogs as Ferguson-era Man Utd, Real Madrid and Juventus. Messi is also still very, very good for PSG.
Messi is an ambassador for the Qatari regime, and Ronaldo has credible reports of sexual assault against him - as human beings go I don't think either are heading for sainthood so for the purposes of this discussion I'm going to stick to just football.
You might also notice that I'm not even arguing for Messi. Merely pointing out that the claim that Ronaldo is the undisputed greatest, end of discussion, no argument, is clearly a nonsense.
Ah my apologies, Saudi. Qatar in the news at the min, Freudian slip!He's an Ambassador for Saudi Arabia, not Qatar. As for the 'GOAT' that's obvs subjective. I can only voice my opinion. He's a more complete player than Messi..
Ah my apologies, Saudi. Qatar in the news at the min, Freudian slip!
No argument that Ronaldo has been a brilliant player, one of the very best. Just as long as we can all agree that he's a cunt.
Twice accused, one out of court pay off, never charged, iirc. The first acuser withdrew the allegations, also iiirc.I don't know him personally. But if he is actually guilty of rape then obvs that puts his footballing talents into the shade. Was he ever found guilty? Or was it one of the settle out of court things.
This still makes me giggle. Imagine his reaction when it was unveiled.
A questionnaire, purportedly between him and his lawyers, was part of the Football Leaks stuff which came out a while ago. If that is real then there isn't any doubt of his guilt.Twice accused, one out of court pay off, never charged, iirc. The first acuser withdrew the allegations, also iiirc.
Beyond comprehension tbh . Man Utd did well to get back into the game after City’s second half start. However I’m afraid it’s decisions like these which Man Utd have unfairly or otherwise been associated with for years which cause a lot of people to dislike them .The offside rule is seriously fucked if the first Manure goal was legal.
Must admit, I'm not convinced it should have stood even within the rules as they have been explained today. Rashford's position as the focus of that attack very likely had an impact on the keeper and defender's positions. I can though understand VAR not overturning it as a clear and obvious error. I'm not even sure it came under the remit of whatever VAR covers. So, erm. actually I don't know!The goal rightfully stood according to the laws of the game. I don't agree with the law but it's there. So don't get all conspiracy on me- especially when we haven't won a trophy in years.
And "Manure" Good grief. How old are you.
Totally. Rashford played it by the book, unambiguously legal goal. It's mainly about decisions made by VAR dragging things out and accentuating a sense of injustice.The goal rightfully stood according to the laws of the game. I don't agree with the law but it's there. So don't get all conspiracy on me- especially when we haven't won a trophy in years.
And "Manure" Good grief. How old are you.