But I can't see the Libdems allowing the govt to fall - they'd be giving up their best chance of ending the two party system. They'd be back in the wildnerness for the rest of the century.
Then gets it taken away again for being a genuine couldn't give a fuck tory yahoo. Mark Reckless MP sorry for being 'too drunk to vote'.
Clegg won't. But it ain't his choice. The MPs know they will all lose their seats because of this - they owe him no loyalty. The party has far, far more power in local councils than they do in parliament - the councillors will lose their seats too. It only takles 75 constituency parties (approx one in eight) to force a leadership election.
Looked like some lads were gonna try to pull down the tree in trafalgur sq at one point but it didnt happen.
I'm 'not at all impressed' with the shabby response by Aaron Porter to today's fantastic demo & Shutdown London. NUS/UCU rally + glowstick vigil of 200 people= £12,000 (incl 60 paid professional security guards/stewards): ULU/LSA/London Region UCU March on Parliament of 50,000 = £600. This is just the beginning...
If this is what it's like in the middle of winter, fuck knows what it will be like in the heat of summer.
I suppose it depends if the momentum keeps up.
Lots of Ifs/buts/maybes?
When is the next big one? Maybe some of us retirees could come out of sofa retirement?
i like him all the more for that tbh. a shame to send him to the lime pits, but we all have to make sacrifices.
He's one of ours, the lime pits it is and that's the end of it.Reckless is the grandson of Henry McDevitt, a Fianna Fáil Teachta Dála for Donegal East in the Dáil Éireann from 1938 until 1943.
You appear not to have read, or at least comprehended, my post. I'll not bother repeating it.You seriously think the bulk of LibDems would fall on their own swords by bringing on an early election and getting themselves kicked out to save a few councillors?
They will hang in there hoping that things will get better over the next four years, most of this will be forgotten, and they'll have at least some chance of saving their sorry arses - FFS they are politicians, not people of principal.
I hear there's one on Saturday for people what work
Genuine question, where has there been anything bias in the BBC’s rolling coverage of the protests?
their reporters seemed genuinely surprised and shocked when the police made the fucking stupid horse charge
Clegg won't. But it ain't his choice. The MPs know they will all lose their seats because of this - they owe him no loyalty. The party has far, far more power in local councils than they do in parliament - the councillors will lose their seats too. It only takles 75 constituency parties (approx one in eight) to force a leadership election.
It's up to us to keep the pressure up. They won't get away with this, and enough careerists realising this can force the government to fall regardless of what the leadership wants.
Both channels have now dropped coverage of the bridge.........
Maybe not a great place to be right now.
You appear not to have read, or at least comprehended, my post. I'll not bother repeating it.
the problem with your second scenario, nick, is that they aren't going to pass a PR bill. so either way they're fucked.But if you're a Lib Dem MP you've got to choose between the lesser of two evils (a) bring down the govt, be hated, and get no votes in the next election or two, and back to the two party system indefinitely, or (b) keep the coalition together, pass some sort of PR bill, be hated, get no votes for an election or two, but retain some chance of getting power again one day. Of course they'd have a tough sell on their hands if PR comes down to a simple public referendum - but perhaps the Tories will bribe them with something more winnable.
the problem with your second scenario, nick, is that they aren't going to pass a PR bill. so either way they're fucked.
like peaceful protest.Watching the BBC the protestors are still on Westminster Bridge out of sight out of mind
But if you're a Lib Dem MP you've got to choose between the lesser of two evils (a) bring down the govt, be hated, and get no votes in the next election or two, and back to the two party system indefinitely, or (b) keep the coalition together, pass some sort of PR bill, be hated, get no votes for an election or two, but retain some chance of getting power again one day. Of course they'd have a tough sell on their hands if PR comes down to a simple public referendum - but perhaps the Tories will bribe them with something more winnable.
Why not? I thought the Tories had to deliver it to keep the coalition together. But I've been abroad all year so I don't know the details.
surprised? why did they bring crash helmets?
they've got a referendum on AV (which is the weakest possible form of PR) next year, which they will almost certainly lose. there won't be another referendum this parliament, so that's their lot.
once they lose the referendum (and all their councillors get wiped out in the local elections on the same day), they may get a bit more nervous on the lib dem benches.