littlebabyjesus
one of Maxwell's demons
Good question. I'm being cautious.Why only 83% and not 99% or 100%?
Good question. I'm being cautious.Why only 83% and not 99% or 100%?
unearned income top rate was 95%. Worked before and perfectly sensible - you wouldn't want any higher than that or it would start to discourage them.In the 1970s, the top rate was 83%. Returning to that would be a decent start.
Sends a clear message. You've got enough fucking money already.
Reflecting on what you say...call me a liberal...but I think I'd go for an upper % of 99% on earned income.So you don't care whether higher rate income tax is set at 45 or 40 pc then?
98% I believe. Comprising the basic rate plus an additional income tax surcharge of 15% on unearned income.unearned income top rate was 95%. Worked before and perfectly sensible - you wouldn't want any higher than that or it would start to discourage them.
What is there to be cautious about?Good question. I'm being cautious.
Yours.What is there to be cautious about?
Also, what's the income that this highest rate applies to?
I was looking at this graph earlier and noticed that 60% bit and trying to understand what the logic of it is.The current highest rate is 60 percent, for the band of income between £100k and £125k. After that it reverts to 40 percent.
Something to do with National Insurance? That has an upper limit.I was looking at this graph earlier and noticed that 60% bit and trying to understand what the logic of it is.
Arab diplomats urge Liz Truss not to move British embassy to Jerusalem
Private letter says ‘illegal” plan could jeopardise free trade deal between UK and Gulf Cooperation Councilwww.theguardian.com
Obviously I’m not up to date on all things truss, but where did this gem of an idea come from ?
This is well on the way to a quarter of a million signatures. However government responded with a big 'fuck you' quite some time agoMuch good it may do but this seems to have taken off big time:
Archived Petition: Call an immediate general election to end the chaos of the current government
Call an immediate general election so that the people can decide who should lead us through the unprecedented crises threatening the UK.petition.parliament.uk
Government responded
This response was given on 20 September 2022
The UK is a Parliamentary democracy and the Conservative Party remains the majority party. The Prime Minister has pledged to ensure opportunity and prosperity for all people and future generations.
I doubt he is any of these thingsI always thought teuchter was just a dimwitted, isolated old fool, but now I realize he's an active tory. Nice
Yeah, but this is a significant question isn't it? We can agree on a really high highest rate but then still have to decide where it starts from, which means somehow deciding what's a reasonable "maximum anyone really needs to earn".Yours.
Yes, but it doesn't take half an hour to say 'you're a pair of fucking clowns, and we think you should rein it in, but if you don't, on your heads be it'.48 minutes. Taking out the time to sign in, pleasantries before and after the meeting, that's probably about 30 minutes of actual conversation. wtf. this is actually quite serious guys.
It was the same with Brexit, remember.I get the feeling the phrase 'we have and 80 seat majority, which gives the mandate to enatch these sorts of things' or words to that effect increasingly over the next few weeks or months.
Or the equally vacuous 'it would have been worse under Corbyn'.
I get the feeling the phrase 'we have and 80 seat majority, which gives the mandate to enatch these sorts of things' or words to that effect increasingly over the next few weeks or months.
Or the equally vacuous 'it would have been worse under Corbyn'.
What’s amazing about Johnson is that aside from the protest bill he pissed an 80 seat majority away doing nothing aside from lining pockets.
More of this incompetence please
oh come on, this is nonsense - he's played you for a fool if you really think thatIt's pretty clear from teuchter's recent posts where his class allegiances lie. He obviously identifies with the so-called "wealth creators"
View attachment 345236
Truss and Kwarteng have long inhabited a world of free market Tory think-tanks, such as the Institute of Economic Affairs, which have nourished a view that Britain is being held back by stale, declinist, economic “orthodoxy”.
While previous generations of Tories saw financial markets as being neutral truth-tellers to feckless governments, many on the rightwing of the Conservative party now see the markets as part of a detached elite that does not understand the potential of tax cuts to stimulate growth.
Lord David Frost, former Brexit minister, is among those urging Truss to stand firm against the “ghastly crew” of the economic establishment. In a Friday column in the Daily Telegraph, he listed the IMF, the European Commission, the FT, the Economist and former Bank of England governor Mark Carney as being part of “the international hectoring classes” and insisted the government rejects “that defeatism”.
This viewpoint, familiar from the 2016 Brexit debates when “experts” were derided by the Leave campaign, is important in understanding the frame of mind of Truss, as she stuck to her guns through a torrid week.
“There’s a mindset, which has been very strong on the right of British politics for many years, which argues that the benefits of supply-side reforms, low taxes and less regulation are immense,” says David Gauke, a former cabinet colleague of Truss who is deeply critical of the “mini” Budget.
Truss arrives in Birmingham on Saturday for the annual Tory conference facing questions about her survival as prime minister, less than a month after becoming Tory leader. Some Tory MPs say they cannot vote for the fiscal plan unless it is reformed.
But those inside Downing Street have taken some comfort in a rally in the pound towards the end of the week and insist Truss has not waited this long to implement her political vision only to be blown off course by the markets.
“She’s very much not in the mood to budge,” says one senior government official. A cabinet minister agrees: “She’s absolutely not changing strategy . . . The situation is deadlocked. She can’t and won’t move.” But if Truss cannot show that the sums add up, the markets may yet decide otherwise.
Between two particular thresholds — I think it’s 100 and 125ish — the tax free allowance is gradually stripped away to zero. This has the effect of creating a higher marginal tax rate in this band of earnings.I was looking at this graph earlier and noticed that 60% bit and trying to understand what the logic of it is.
What a bunch of fucking incompetents. This didn’t make sense on any level. The new govt had two years to gain lost popularity and they do this? How does that make sense? Even if her ‘trickle down’ economic nonsense did pan out, it would be so far down the line that 2 years wouldn’t see the result. Check the last sentence in this Telegraph article. archive.ph.