Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Liz Truss’s time is up

Being a time of crisis, she should form a national government with Labour. Good old WW2 stuff. Then start bombing somewhere. Curfew, lockdown and homeguard - make Thatcher look like a wimp, and blow away any of Johnsons pretensions.
 
I'd like to agree with you, but not a hope in hell IMO.
The consolidator state and the neoliberal ideologues managing it will always defend (unearned) wealth and use tax derived from labour to subsidise businesses with corporate welfare. Nationalising goes against every tenet of their world view.

Otoh all British nuclear power stations are owned by the French state
 
Only if we confuse superstructural nationalism deployed for electoral purpose with the neoliberalism of the base.
If nationalisation is used to bail out shareholders, no one complains.
The post-WW2 nationalisations were such; Churchills reasons for nationalising BP:
In truth neither liberalism nor neoliberalism has an ideolgy. There is the principle that "money has no master" and that includes ideologies. The abstract nouns and ideologies are used to justify the aim: profit.

Thus nationalisations and cartels are acceptable as long as they are democratic in the original sense, which has nothing to do with the inhabitants voting for parties :)

So a cartel should be open to all in the same sector. E.g., Microsoft and all the other major phone makers (except Apple) are in a cartel which owns many of the major patents needed for phones.

The present war between the West and Russia is the same as the Opium Wars with China - it boils down to forcing Russia to have an "Open Door" business policy
 
If nationalisation is used to bail out shareholders, no one complains.
The post-WW2 nationalisations were such; Churchills reasons for nationalising BP:

In truth neither liberalism nor neoliberalism has an ideolgy. There is the principle that "money has no master" and that includes ideologies. The abstract nouns and ideologies are used to justify the aim: profit.

Thus nationalisations and cartels are acceptable as long as they are democratic in the original sense, which has nothing to do with the inhabitants voting for parties :)

So a cartel should be open to all in the same sector. E.g., Microsoft and all the other major phone makers (except Apple) are in a cartel which owns many of the major patents needed for phones.

The present war between the West and Russia is the same as the Opium Wars with China - it boils down to forcing Russia to have an "Open Door" business policy
But drawing parallels with the mid 20thC nationalisations seems to ignore the neoliberal structural changes to global capital. RepDem politicians no longer represent national interests, they're merely there to ensure that the consolidator state is managed to maximise the transfer of wealth from earned to unearned. Furthermore the corporations responsible for the energy crisis are hardly in need of 'bailing out'; much more effective to use tax revenues on labour to subsidise the continued corporate profit gouging.
 
If nationalisation is used to bail out shareholders, no one complains.
The post-WW2 nationalisations were such; Churchills reasons for nationalising BP:

In truth neither liberalism nor neoliberalism has an ideolgy. There is the principle that "money has no master" and that includes ideologies. The abstract nouns and ideologies are used to justify the aim: profit.

Thus nationalisations and cartels are acceptable as long as they are democratic in the original sense, which has nothing to do with the inhabitants voting for parties :)

So a cartel should be open to all in the same sector. E.g., Microsoft and all the other major phone makers (except Apple) are in a cartel which owns many of the major patents needed for phones.

The present war between the West and Russia is the same as the Opium Wars with China - it boils down to forcing Russia to have an "Open Door" business policy


Russia had an open door, so open it spent huge swathes of money buying politicians around the world. Oodles of illicit and dirty money adventuring in the world.

Then it invaded Ukraine all by itself.
 
If Braverman is to be Home Secretary :facepalm:, who tf is to be Attorney General? :facepalm: Every time you think it can't get worse, it does.
 
Mark Francios is five seven, so there's one.
Gove, too, actually.
They'll probably be in the same place.
 
I'll be honest, I'm looking forward to the Liz shitshow. One of the things I'm hoping for is she gets zero bump in the polls. The other thing I'm looking forward to is Boris stealing her limelight constantly because if the press it to believed he thinks he can make a comeback.
 
Back
Top Bottom