Working class is just better?
is it though? really?
I'd rather be a lay about toff than middle class TBF. But you know. I'd rather be a middle class proffessional than a working class drone. In terms of more influence over the work I get to do. Given that working isn't optional.
For what values of "better"?
Working-class, sink school kids who get to Oxford are, by definition than almost all of their peers (and probably none - Oxford had no free school meal kids in the last intake - and I'm betting the increase in state school intake is due to rich kids reduced to state school by the recession - they fraudulated the black student statistics so badly that Cameron accidentally outed them by quoting them verbatiim and causing confuddlement on Twitter that just had to be explained by some folk who have been watching this saga unfold for a while
).
So yeah. "Why are they automatically better?!" I hear you screech. Because with those levels of discrimination, you have to be a fucking freak of brain-cell design to get anywhere near the place. Send your kid to Eton, and it has a default 33% chance of getting a place before
intelligence academic diligence (aka nerdiness/ambition) even need be ranked to determine which third get the gig.
In any given context where discrimination can be overcome by sheer blinding merit, those that make it inside the walls are going to be the very best of the very best because they are the best of the 50,000 kids who are better than every single one of your classmates (barring the occasional throwback toff with a functioning brain and genuinely talented working- and middle-class kids who had no real special help or hindrance, they just set a goal that interested them and earned the opportunity of a lifetime.
(I'm none of these, I don't count, I have the luck of the devil - my school loved Oxbridge candidates, but laughed at me when I said I was going to apply. I think I got in because the elderly economics dude fell asleep in my interview and when they woke him up to ask me a question he said there was no point because I clearly wasn't interested in economics. I gave him a brief lecture on the illogicality of this assumption when I
had applied for economics at the only other university in the country that offered PPE but otherwise could not fill out the rest of the form without making one of my three interviewers think I wasn't interested in their subject before they'd even met me (or limit my chances of university bv foregoing three other opportunities). I was an all sciences A Level student who could not get in any other way than via an interview, with no way of knowing what I will choose to study the most because I am applying to do three brand new subjects to me, and I was being blocked because only one other university offers the course I want to do? How does that work then?
I don't know whether they sought legal advice before giving me an offer, but I think it was because the economics dude was a vacant old fascist whose underqualified wife got the first year politics gig and the guy was universally hated. Or economics dude had a thing for being told off by big bolshy women. I can't fathom it. My predicted A Level grades were really, really bad (given that I was applying for Oxford), and this was at a time when the standard offer for my course was ABB, not three A*. Told you I had the luck of the devil).