Most utterly banal tautologies are pretty clear yes. They don't say very much though
None of this shit is rocket science.
Most utterly banal tautologies are pretty clear yes. They don't say very much though
Says the no-mark Bristol bookshop wanker arguing Leave will lead to higher wages and better working conditions because of nasty EU neolibs (despite a huge body of empirical evidence suggesting that harder borders and more distant trading partners = less trade, kinda fucking over everyone working in an exporting sector or who relies on imports).What we appear to have here is a series of clowns arguing that capitalism is shit in defence of capitalism and for a specific configuration of it that encourages an outcome they pretend that they're decrying.
Dont forget the shitter environmental and product safety standards too. Chlorinated chicken ftwAnd without the constraints of european law they will be able to drive down conditions for workers to save money.
But Smokeandsteam those people don't exist, don't you knowThere is already hardship around in many leave voting areas of Wales, the Midlands, the north and dying coastal towns. It’s kind of why they voted leave in the first place.
.Lord Bragg said:We were getting on pretty well.
Stick with what worked before.
This doesnt carry much weight unless you can tell a convincing story about the jobs leavers went onto being worse in terms of working conditions.UK Automotive Employment 1971 - 502,000
UK Automotive Employment 2018- 162,000
You think if the UK never joined the world would still be happily buying crappy British Leyland bangers keeping those 000,000s of workers in work? Deluded.I'm not suggesting that the jobs are not relatively well paid. I am making the point that a) the UK automotive sector has undergone massive decline, around 300,000 jobs, since we joined the EU. More, if you count the wider nexus of jobs of that used to provide parts. This amounted to over 100,000 lost jobs in the West Midlands alone and that b) whether we leave or stay this decline will continue as the industry seeks to lower wages, increase production elsewhere and maximise profit.
For example JLR, which is part of my union Branch, has constantly sought to blame Brexit for lay offs, partial shut downs and for possible closures. There is one problem with this - it's bullshit. JLR is seeking to divert attention from two fundamental facts a) it's built too many cars of the wrong model, despite repeated warnings from the shopfloor that it needed to diversify production and b) its medium and long term capital investment plan is to maximise new plant and manufacture outside of what it terms 'high wage' (meaning unionised) locations. This strategy will continue regardless of whether the UK is in/out.
When JLR whinges about Brexit it means that it wants the UK to remain so that it can freely and quickly import more and more product using its 'just in time' supply chain model, particularly manufactured goods from elsewhere. Assembly jobs will still exist but will taper off as production techniques develop and more can be imported already assembled.
The idea that EU membership 'protects jobs' is laughable. In fact, it's arguable that disruption the model under a 'hard Brexit' would slow down their strategy and retain jobs.
The socialist utopia Brexit will usher in will be great - I can't wait. Much jobs, endless wage rises etcI've not seen a single argument for stopping Brexit made from a socialist basis.
Firstly, the quality of automotive work isn't about pay in itself. For example: skills, sustainability, purpose, accessibility to entrants without classic higher education, and a greater if still deeply flawed degree of permanence. That's why skilled manufacturing is important, and why the picture you paint of terminal linear decline since the 1970s is a pretty shitty way to try and portray where we are today. And I'm not here to defend the EU on this subject - the tariff-free trade that I claim to be a major part in retaining the industry in the UK is hardly a charitable endeavour, is it - but 'since we joined the EU' presented as cause or catalyst is bollocks. Look at the fucking state of the British car industry by the early 1970s and show me how it was European membership wot did it.You haven't got a clue have you?
I'm not suggesting that the jobs are not relatively well paid. I am making the point that a) the UK automotive sector has undergone massive decline, around 300,000 jobs, since we joined the EU. More, if you count the wider nexus of jobs of that used to provide parts. This amounted to over 100,000 lost jobs in the West Midlands alone and that b) whether we leave or stay this decline will continue as the industry seeks to lower wages, increase production elsewhere and maximise profit.
JLR have fucked it up of late no doubt, but they're not alone in this, and ultimately the fundamentals are such that it will continue on making money, making cars and employing people wherever that is.For example JLR, which is part of my union Branch, has constantly sought to blame Brexit for lay offs, partial shut downs and for possible closures. There is one problem with this - it's bullshit. JLR is seeking to divert attention from two fundamental facts a) it's built too many cars of the wrong model, despite repeated warnings from the shopfloor that it needed to diversify production and b) its medium and long term capital investment plan is to maximise new plant and manufacture outside of what it terms 'high wage' (meaning unionised) locations. This strategy will continue regardless of whether the UK is in/out.
No shit, detective. It's almost like that's how the car industry works.When JLR whinges about Brexit it means that it wants the UK to remain so that it can freely and quickly import more and more product using its 'just in time' supply chain model
Heh. How exactly? The crash of the pound?The idea that EU membership 'protects jobs' is laughable. In fact, it's arguable that disruption the model under a 'hard Brexit' would slow down their strategy and retain jobs.
You think if the UK never joined the world would still be happily buying crappy British Leyland bangers keeping those 000,000s of workers in work? Deluded.
Look at Japanese investment and job creation in the UK (e.g. Nissan). A huge factor was access to the Single Market. UK car manufacture is now just part of a network of supply chains deeply embedded in the SM. Even just the crankshaft of a Mini crosses tbe channel 3 times before installation. Its bonkers to think that manufacturers will retain the bit of their process that will be the bottleneck in the face of purely continental operators undercutting them by avoiding all the grief at the borders...
Actions need to have consequences, otherwise no one learns.You cretin
Could you illustrate the lesson in full for me please. I have a desire to learn.Actions need to have consequences, otherwise no one learns.
Actions need to have consequences, otherwise no one learns.
Look at Japanese investment and job creation in the UK (e.g. Nissan). A huge factor was access to the Single Market.
Nothing predates FACTSAnd yet Nissan’s Sunderland car plant predates the Single Market by nine years. Weird, huh.
sympathies! I was brought up thereyeah - Llanelli is a pretty grim place. spent a few days there moving my brother out of the shittist, slummiest, private rented accomodation i have ever seen.
Yeah it’s like those guys that get hard off the no nonsense attitude of Guy Verhofstadt. Mate, Guy isn’t gonna standing at the pearly gates with open arms cause you stood behind him giving it “yeeeeeeeah!” when he bullied everyone else in the school.Are you an official of the IMF or ECB? Or just a cunt?
And yet Nissan’s Sunderland car plant predates the Single Market by nine years. Weird, huh.
We joined the customs union in 1973. Nissan's Sunderland plant was 1984, and has been heavily investing ever since and sells about half its output into the EU. So yeah - my point stands.And yet Nissan’s Sunderland car plant predates the Single Market by nine years. Weird, huh.
We joined the customs union in 1973. Nissan's Sunderland plant was 1984, and has been heavily investing ever since and sells about half its output into the EU. So yeah - my point stands.
I'm not sure what your point is.
You utter weaponNope.
What your wiggle does show though is a woeful ignorance of the difference between the customs union and single market.
Were they necessary "reforms"? Inevitable as in There Is No Alternative? The privatisation of public services, energy, water, railways, telecommunications, mail, housing? Perversely with many of the public goods now owned by foreign state owned companies.One could argue that a lot of Thatcher’s “reforms” were necessary and/or inevitable, but they were not managed and we pissed away the North Sea oil revenues on unemployment benefit. And destroyed communities with it.
Economy is overweighted to Financial Services and London. The City of Londons role in tax havens and money laundering needs to recognised.Financial and legal services will probably survive at about 80% of current levels. All financial firms will need a European base. Bosses tend to be able to have workers move to them.
It will be a while before you write a contract in Italian law, but arbitration under London Rules in other centres is growing.
Didn't you move to South America? Anyway I voted leave but doubt that Brexit will ever happen.At least, when you’ve finished the housework with your Singaporean Dyson vacuum you can retire to a weatherspoons pub.
I’m imagining the new blue passports will have the pages at the back to record currency being taken out.
LRB · Neal Ascherson · As the toffs began to retreat: DeclinismYou think if the UK never joined the world would still be happily buying crappy British Leyland bangers keeping those 000,000s of workers in work? Deluded.
He quotes Tony Benn, looking back on the turmoil at BL’s Longbridge plant: ‘And then you bring in managers from a business studies course who’d got a degree in business management but who couldn’t mend a puncture in a motor tyre – and you speak about the people who made the cars as the problem?’
Is "the crankshaft of a Mini crosses the channel 3 times before installation" a good thing? Is it progress?Look at Japanese investment and job creation in the UK (e.g. Nissan). A huge factor was access to the Single Market. UK car manufacture is now just part of a network of supply chains deeply embedded in the SM. Even just the crankshaft of a Mini crosses tbe channel 3 times before installation. Its bonkers to think that manufacturers will retain the bit of their process that will be the bottleneck in the face of purely continental operators undercutting them by avoiding all the grief at the borders...
There is a fine Scots word for the sale of the contents of a house, farm or factory: a ‘displenishment’. We have certainly witnessed the displenishment of Great Britain. Hamilton-Paterson’s grief, his sense of injury and loss, is eloquent.
But, speaking for myself, I can’t share that ‘brand’ nostalgia. I would trade a hundred Hillman Imps or a dozen Bristol Britannias (‘The Whispering Giant’) for one Man from the Ministry, standing outside an ‘advance factory’ waving an Industrial Development Certificate. He didn’t stand around in a wasteland of nail-bars and food banks, squeaking that ‘Britain is open for business!’
He planned the business, planted it where it was needed and gave it a launching push with public money. He and the men and women he worked for – Hugh Dalton, Jennie Lee, Tom Johnston, Aneurin Bevan – would know how to stop the metaphorical train’s backward slide and set it climbing again. But to what strange landscapes? For that disciplined, centralised ‘new British nation’ they created will never be found again.
Yes, I escaped Brexit to get BolsonaroDidn't you move to South America? Anyway I voted leave but doubt that Brexit will ever happen.