nino_savatte
No pasaran!
Ralph Miliband, thou shouldst be living at this hour.
I salute your optimism but I don't share it. Labour is in its death throes. The best thing that can happen is for what remains of the Labour left to split and leave the Blairite filth to merge with the Lib Dems.So pay £3 and help build a campaign to make sure they don't (and VP - to change th composition of that leadership cadre).
AC14 You have been asked a lot of very specific, reasonable and salient questions in your absence. There were a lot of them and it would take some time to reply to them all. However, could you at least have a go because you haven't contributed anything specific to the debate so far. You've just called people names and said very vague stuff about it being important to be in power.
People as wrong-minded and outmoded as us are surely sitting targets to be picked apart with reason and evidence. Why don't you have a go?
Maybe you could reply to this, AC14.
typical lab-bot response
He's certainly dodged every effort to get him to express a view beyond "Labour needs to be less left-wing" so far, but everyone has an ideology, and he says his is socialism, so I'm curious to see what he thinks that means. It'd go a long way to furthering the discussion he claims to be asking for if he makes it clear what he wants to achieve.
\For those with faceache, this is great https://www.facebook.com/pages/Liz-Kendall-for-Conservative-Leader/785674451530108?fref=ts
It is a weird frickin world where you get accused of being a "north london middle class" type for not being a Blairite.
Who wrote that shite?I think this says it better than I could (and I think this person should be one of our candidates v soon): http://noramulready.com/2015/06/15/575/
Never met him.Like Corbyn?
It's really not hard to find out, but that's not a powerful argument against it.Who wrote that shite?
See the link I just posted. Why the 'he'?
Who wrote that shite?
So you're not prepared to say who authored a piece that you linked to? Strange.It's really not hard to find out, but that's not a powerful argument against it.
So you're not prepared to say who authored a piece that you linked to? Strange.
Are you serious? Her name is in the link.
i was hoping nora mulready was a pseudonym because i thought no one could possibly publish such vapid wank under their own name brogdaleIt's really not hard to find out, but that's not a powerful argument against it.
i was hoping nora mulready was a pseudonym because i thought no one could possibly publish such vapid wank under their own name brogdale
Nora Mulready. Haringey Labour apparently? Awful Tory shite either way.
grandOK, can't be bothered with you either.
it's an opinion i suppose.Apart from the blog, which is not Tory. And makes sense.
It is very very Tory.Apart from the blog, which is not Tory. And makes sense.
not in a good way either i'm sureIt is very very Tory.
Apart from being angry that the Tories are in power, disgusted with their moves, and utterly committed to opportunities for working class people - on top of so much else.It is very very Tory.
We need to look beyond traditional left wing ideas like not kicking old ladies to death in the street and welcome the old-lady-kickers-to-death of this nation into a new political consensus based on a shared vision of fairness, decency and kicking old ladies to death in the street. The radical left would have you believe that fairness and arbitrary violence against the elderly are fundamentally incompatible ideas, but that's just because they're silly and childish and they don't understand the need for compromise.
We need to look beyond traditional left wing ideas like not kicking old ladies to death in the street and welcome the old-lady-kickers-to-death of this nation into a new political consensus based on a shared vision of fairness, decency and kicking old ladies to death in the street. The radical left would have you believe that fairness and arbitrary violence against the elderly are fundamentally incompatible ideas, but that's just because they're silly and childish and they don't understand the need for compromise.
And on international relations, war and peace, well I would dearly love to be a pacifist in a peaceful world, in a world where no-one ever had to fight for the right to be who they were, in a world where there were no oppressed minorities, no Boko Haram, no Assads, no Al Queda, no Taliban, no totalitarian or theocratic dictatorships, a world where the Kurds hadn’t been gassed, where they weren’t being forced to kill or be killed by ISIS, where American airstrikes were not needed to defend women against mass rape, the removal of breasts, the gauging out of eyes.
what your blog says is let's go round killing for peace. that's surely not a good idea. if only the last labour government hadn't been so bloodthirsty, precipitating pogroms in kosovo for example.Apart from being angry that the Tories are in power, disgusted with their moves, and utterly committed to opportunities for working class people - on top of so much else.
As I said. Easy riposte without substance.